Electron Precipitation From the Outer Radiation Belt During the St. Patrick's Day Storm 2015: Observations, Modeling, and Validation

被引:13
|
作者
Clilverd, Mark A. [1 ]
Rodger, Craig J. [2 ]
van de Kamp, Max [3 ]
Verronen, Pekka T. [3 ]
机构
[1] British Antarctic Survey UKRI NERC, Cambridge, England
[2] Univ Otago, Dept Phys, Dunedin, New Zealand
[3] Finnish Meteorol Inst, Helsinki, Finland
基金
英国自然环境研究理事会;
关键词
GEOMAGNETIC STORM; ACCELERATION; FLUXES; EVENTS; MARCH;
D O I
10.1029/2019JA027725
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
Recently, a model for medium-energy (30-1000 keV) radiation belt-driven electron precipitation (ApEEP) has been put forward for use in decadal to century-long climate model runs as part of the Climate Modelling Intercomparison Project, phase 6 (CMIP6). The ApEEP model is based on directly observed precipitation data spanning 2002-2012 from the constellation of low-Earth-orbiting Polar Operational Environmental Satellites (POES). Here, we test the ApEEP model's ability using its magnetic local time variant, ApEEP_MLT, to accurately represent electron precipitation fluxes from the radiation belts during a large geomagnetic storm that occurred outside of the span of the development data set. In a study of narrowband subionospheric very low frequency (VLF) transmitter data collected during March 2015, continuous phase observations have been analyzed throughout the entire St. Patrick's Day geomagnetic storm period for the first time. Using phase data from the U.K. transmitter, call-sign GVT (22.1 kHz), received in Reykjavik, Iceland, electron precipitation fluxes from L = 2.8 to 5.4 are calculated around magnetic local noon (12 MLT) and magnetic midnight (00 MLT). VLF-inferred >30-keV fluxes are similar to the equivalent directly observed POES fluxes. The ApEEP_MLT >30-keV fluxes for L < 5.5 describe the overall St. Patrick's Day geomagnetic storm-driven flux enhancement well, although they are a factor of 1.7 (1.3) lower than POES (VLF-inferred) fluxes during the recovery phase. Such close agreement in >30-keV flux levels during a large geomagnetic storm, using three different techniques, indicates this flux forcing are appropriate for decadal climate simulations for which the ApEEP model was created.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [41] Variation of atmospheric electric field measured at Vostok, Antarctica, during St. Patrick's Day storms on 24th solar cycle
    Victor, N. Jeni
    Frank-Kamenetsky, A. V.
    Manu, S.
    Panneerselvam, C.
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2017, 122 (06) : 6332 - 6348
  • [42] Low- and Mid-Latitude Ionospheric Response to the 2013 St. Patrick's Day Geomagnetic Storm in the American Sector: Global Ionosphere Thermosphere Model Simulation
    Zhu, Qingyu
    Lu, Gang
    Deng, Yue
    FRONTIERS IN ASTRONOMY AND SPACE SCIENCES, 2022, 9
  • [43] Qualitative estimation of magnetic storm efficiency in producing relativistic electron flux in the Earth's outer radiation belt using geomagnetic pulsations data
    Degtyarev, V. I.
    Kharchenko, I. P.
    Potapov, A. S.
    Tsegmed, B.
    Chudnenko, S. E.
    ADVANCES IN SPACE RESEARCH, 2009, 43 (05) : 829 - 836
  • [44] Dependence of Electron Flux Dropouts in the Earth's Outer Radiation Belt on Energy and Driving Parameters During Geomagnetic Storms
    Hua, Man
    Bortnik, Jacob
    Ma, Donglai
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2023, 128 (10)
  • [45] Generation and Impacts of Whistler-Mode Waves During Energetic Electron Injections in Jupiter's Outer Radiation Belt
    Ma, Q.
    Li, W.
    Zhang, X. -J.
    Bortnik, J.
    Shen, X. -C.
    Daly, A.
    Kurth, W. S.
    Mauk, B. H.
    Allegrini, F.
    Connerney, J. E. P.
    Bagenal, F.
    Bolton, S. J.
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2024, 129 (07)
  • [46] Spectra and Pitch-Angular Distributions of Relativistic Electrons Near the Outer Radiation Belt Maximum During the Magnetic Storm of December 19-22, 2015
    Sotnikov, N. V.
    Antonova, E. E.
    Riazantseva, M. O.
    Ovchinnikov, I. L.
    Rubinstein, I. A.
    Barinova, V. O.
    Mit', S. K.
    GEOMAGNETISM AND AERONOMY, 2019, 59 (06) : 651 - 659