A meta analysis of spray drift sampling

被引:25
作者
Donkersley, P. [1 ]
Nuyttens, D. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lancaster, Lancaster Environm Ctr, Lancaster LA1 4YQ, England
[2] Inst Agr & Fisheries Res ILVO, Technol & Food Sci Unit, Merelbeke, Belgium
关键词
Spray drift; Pesticide fate; Eco-toxicology; Orchard; Field; Wind tunnel; PDPA laser analysis; Meta-analysis; SAMPLERS; CLASSIFICATION; NOZZLES;
D O I
10.1016/j.cropro.2011.03.020
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
There are many methods available for sampling spray drift, and a great variety of estimates of spray drift have been published. Available data on spray drift were collected from different studies and the measurements of spray drift were analysed to determine similarities and differences between the individual studies. Each of the methods varied significantly in their estimates of spray drift. This variation was due to many factors that differed between the published sources, such as environmental conditions, cropping system, equipment used and the tracer used. It is suggested that in order to compare drift measurements between published studies, measurement techniques and sampling distances must be standardised, and environmental conditions (humidity and temperature) should be restricted to within certain boundaries in the field, and controlled within artificial tests, unless, of course, the effect of this variable on drift is being examined. Crown Copyright (C) 2011 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:931 / 936
页数:6
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [1] ARVIDSSON T., 1997, Spray Drift as Influenced by Meteorological and Technical factors. A Methodological Study
  • [2] Predicting drift from field spraying by means of a 3D computational fluid dynamics model
    Baetens, K.
    Nuyttens, D.
    Verboven, P.
    De Schampheleire, M.
    Nicolai, B.
    Ramon, H.
    [J]. COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONICS IN AGRICULTURE, 2007, 56 (02) : 161 - 173
  • [3] A validated 2-D diffusion-advection model for prediction of drift from ground boom sprayers
    Baetens, K.
    Ho, Q. T.
    Nuyttens, D.
    De Schampheleire, M.
    Endalew, A. Melese
    Hertog, M. L. A. T. M.
    Nicolai, B.
    Ramon, H.
    Verboven, P.
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2009, 43 (09) : 1674 - 1682
  • [4] Balsari P, 2005, T ASAE, V48, P1689, DOI 10.13031/2013.19997
  • [5] A test bench for the classification of boom sprayers according to drift risk
    Balsari, Paolo
    Marucco, Paolo
    Tamagnone, Mario
    [J]. CROP PROTECTION, 2007, 26 (10) : 1482 - 1489
  • [6] BODE LE, 1984, P PESTICIDE DRIFT MA, V50
  • [7] BOUSE LF, 1990, T ASAE, V33, P783, DOI 10.13031/2013.31401
  • [8] Bui QD, 1998, T ASAE, V41, P37, DOI 10.13031/2013.17149
  • [9] A comparison of the drift potential of a novel twin fluid nozzle with conventional low volume flat fan nozzles when using a range of adjuvants
    Combellack, JH
    Western, NM
    Richardson, RG
    [J]. CROP PROTECTION, 1996, 15 (02) : 147 - 152
  • [10] An evaluation of two field samplers for monitoring spray drift
    Cooper, JF
    Smith, DN
    Dobson, HM
    [J]. CROP PROTECTION, 1996, 15 (03) : 249 - 257