Existence of a monetary steady state in a matching model: divisible money

被引:21
作者
Zhu, T [1 ]
机构
[1] Cornell Univ, Dept Econ, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
关键词
matching model; divisible money; steady states; existence theorem;
D O I
10.1016/j.jet.2004.05.007
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Existence of a monetary steady state is established in a random matching model with divisible goods, divisible money, an arbitrary bound on individual money holdings, and take-it-or-leave-it offers by consumers. The monetary steady state shown to exist has nice properties: the value function, defined on money holdings, is strictly increasing and strictly concave, and the distribution over money holdings has full support. The approach is to show that the "limit" of the nice steady states for indivisible money, existence of which was established in an earlier paper, as the unit of money goes to zero is a monetary steady state for divisible money. For indivisible money, the marginal utility of consumption at zero was assumed to be large, for divisible money it is assumed to be large and finite. (c) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:135 / 160
页数:26
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]  
Aliprantis C., 1999, Infinite-dimensional analysis. A hitchhiker's guide, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-662-03961-8
[2]  
BILLINGSLEY AW, 1968, CONVERGENCE PROBABIL
[3]  
Huber P. J., 1981, ROBUST STAT
[4]   ON MONEY AS A MEDIUM OF EXCHANGE [J].
KIYOTAKI, N ;
WRIGHT, R .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1989, 97 (04) :927-954
[5]  
MCSHANE E. J., 1959, REAL ANAL
[6]  
MOLICO M, 1997, THESIS U PENNSYLVANI
[7]   Money and prices: A model of search and bargaining [J].
Shi, SY .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC THEORY, 1995, 67 (02) :467-496
[8]   A matching model with bounded holdings of indivisible money [J].
Taber, A ;
Wallace, N .
INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1999, 40 (04) :961-984
[9]   SEARCH, BARGAINING, MONEY, AND PRICES [J].
TREJOS, A ;
WRIGHT, R .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1995, 103 (01) :118-141
[10]   A commodity-money refinement in matching models [J].
Wallace, N ;
Zhu, T .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC THEORY, 2004, 117 (02) :246-258