Sixty Years of Post-Fire Assessment and Monitoring on Non-Federal Lands in California: What Have We Learned?

被引:0
作者
Cafferata, Peter H. [1 ]
Coe, Drew B. R. [2 ]
Short, William R. [3 ]
机构
[1] Calif Dept Forestry & Fire Protect, POB 944246, Sacramento, CA 94244 USA
[2] Calif Dept Forestry & Fire Protect, 6105 Airport Rd, Redding, CA 96002 USA
[3] Calif Geol Survey, Calif Dept Conservat, 801 K St, Sacramento, CA 95820 USA
关键词
Post-Fire Assessment; Flooding; Debris Flows; Wildfire; Watershed Hazards; Post-Fire Rehabil-itation; Emergency Response; Public Safety; DEBRIS FLOWS; TRANSVERSE RANGES; ROCKFALL HAZARD; WILDFIRE; MONTECITO; SEVERITY; COLORADO; FLOODS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
California has a long history of damage from post fire flooding and debris flows, often described as the fire-flood sequence. Post-wildfire assessment has been conducted on California's non-federal lands for more than 60 years. From 1956 to 1999, the focus was on aerial grass seeding for emergency revegetation. Later, hillslope treatments including straw mulch and hydro mulch were shown to be more effective in reducing erosion, but their high cost make them generally infeasible. In the 1990s the state moved away from aerial grass seeding and embraced a dual strategy for minimizing post-fire impacts. First, fire suppression repair work became consistently applied to all fires. Typical repairs include installing waterbreaks on firelines, grading roads, removing soil from crossings, and mulching mechanically disturbed areas near streams. Second, there was greater use of interdisciplinary teams to evaluate life safety and property threats from debris flows, flooding, and rockfall on non-federal lands. The state process was pioneered by the California Geological Survey (CGS) in 1993 and has benefited from advances in spatially explicit modeling since 2000. Currently, state teams are co-led by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection and CGS, with evaluations only conducted on fires with significant threats. This approach is effective for rapidly notifying emergency management agencies of hazards, helping to protect lives and prop- erty. This process will benefit from further technological advances, monitoring, and improved modeling. Strate- gies for improving post-fire hazard evaluation and better emergency preparedness through pre-fire hazard mitiga- tion planning are provided.
引用
收藏
页码:409 / 422
页数:14
相关论文
共 70 条
  • [1] Using repeat lidar to estimate sediment transport in a steep stream
    Anderson, Scott
    Pitlick, John
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-EARTH SURFACE, 2014, 119 (03) : 621 - 643
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1973, CALIFORNIA GEOLOGY
  • [3] Association of State Floodplain Managers (ASFPM) Foundation, 2019, EL DOC
  • [4] Barro S. C., 1987, PSW102 US DEP AGR FO
  • [5] Rethinking wildfires and forest watersheds
    Bladon, Kevin D.
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2018, 359 (6379) : 1001 - 1002
  • [6] Blanford R. H., 1972, EMERGENCY REVEGETATI
  • [7] California Department of Forestry (CAL FIRE) and Fire Protection and California Geological Survey (CGS), 2021, PROC GUID WAT EM RES
  • [8] California Division of Forestry (CDF), 1972, EM REV BURN WAT
  • [9] California Geological Survey (CGS), 2002, CAL GEOM PROV NOT NO
  • [10] California Governor's Office of Emergency Services (Cal OES), 2018, CAL STAT HAZ MIT PLA