Cognitive and social issues in emergency medicine knowledge translation: A research agenda

被引:20
作者
Brehaut, Jamie C. [1 ]
Hamm, Robert
Majumdar, Sumit
Papa, Frank
Lott, Alison
Lang, Eddy
机构
[1] Ottawa Hlth Res Inst, Clin Epidemiol Unit, Clin Epidemiol Program, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Ottawa, Dept Epidemiol & Community Med, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Oklahoma, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Family & Prevent Med, Oklahoma City, OK USA
[4] Univ Alberta, Dept Med, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[5] Univ N Texas Hlth Ctr, Ft Worth, TX USA
[6] McGill Univ, Dept Emergency Med, Montreal, PQ, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
knowledge translation; consensus proceedings;
D O I
10.1197/j.aem.2007.06.025
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
The individual practitioner is a linchpin in the process of translating new knowledge into practice, particularly in the emergency department, where physician autonomy is high, resources are limited, and decision-making situations are complex. An understanding of the cognitive and social processes that affect knowledge translation (KT) in emergency medicine (EM) is crucial and at present understudied. As part of the 2007 Academic Emergency Medicine Consensus Conference on KT in EM, our group sought to identify key research areas that would inform our understanding of these cognitive and social processes. We combined an online discussion group of interdisciplinary stakeholders, an extensive review of the existing literature, and a "public hearing" of the recommendations at the Consensus Conference to establish relative preference for the recommendations, as well as their relevance and clarity to attendees. We identified five key research areas as follows. 1) What provider-specific barriers/facilitators to the use of new knowledge are relevant in the EM setting? 2) Can social psychological theories of behavior change be used to develop better KT interventions for EM? 3) Can the study of "distributed cognition" suggest new vehicles for KT in the emergency department? 4) Can the concept of dual-process reasoning inform our understanding of the KT process? 5) Can patient-specific, immediate feedback serve as a vehicle for KT in EM? We believe that exploring these key research questions will directly lead to improved KT interventions and to further discussion of the cognitive and social factors impacting KT in EM.
引用
收藏
页码:984 / 990
页数:7
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]  
ABERNATHY C, 1995, SURG INTUTION WHAT I
[2]   PREDICTION OF LEISURE PARTICIPATION FROM BEHAVIORAL, NORMATIVE, AND CONTROL BELIEFS - AN APPLICATION OF THE THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR [J].
AJZEN, I ;
DRIVER, BL .
LEISURE SCIENCES, 1991, 13 (03) :185-204
[3]   APPLICATION OF THE THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR TO LEISURE CHOICE [J].
AJZEN, I ;
DRIVER, BL .
JOURNAL OF LEISURE RESEARCH, 1992, 24 (03) :207-224
[4]   THE THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR [J].
AJZEN, I .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1991, 50 (02) :179-211
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1995, PREDICTING HLTH BEHA
[6]   Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analytic review [J].
Armitage, CJ ;
Conner, M .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 40 :471-499
[7]  
Bång M, 2003, METHOD INFORM MED, V42, P331
[8]  
Bero LA, 1998, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V317, P465
[9]   Will a new clinical decision rule be widely used? The case of the Canadian C-Spine Rule [J].
Brehaut, JC ;
Stiell, IG ;
Graham, ID .
ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2006, 13 (04) :413-420
[10]   Clinical decision rules "in the real world": How a widely disseminated rule is used in everyday practice [J].
Brehaut, JC ;
Stiell, IG ;
Visentin, L ;
Graham, ID .
ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2005, 12 (10) :948-956