Candesartan and hydrochlorothiazide in isolated systolic hypertension

被引:11
作者
Wing, LMH
Arnolda, LF
Upton, J
Molloy, D
机构
[1] Flinders Univ S Australia, Sch Med, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
[2] Flinders Med Ctr, Adelaide, SA, Australia
关键词
blood pressure; candesartan cilexetil; elderly; hydrochlorothiazide; systolic hypertension;
D O I
10.1080/08037050310014954
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Aim: We investigated the efficacy and safety of daily candesartan 8/16 mg and hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg as monotherapy and in combination in older patients with systolic hypertension. Methods: The study used a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled crossover design. Treatment phases were of 6 weeks duration. For inclusion, patients were aged 55-84 years with sitting systolic blood pressure (SBP) 160-210 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) < 95 mmHg. Nineteen patients (11 male, eight female, median age 68 years) completed the study. Major findings: Compared with the placebo phase, clinic and ambulatory SBP was significantly reduced with both dose-adjusted candesartan and fixed-dose hydrochlorothiazide as monotherapy, the effect of candesartan being greater than that of hydrochlorothiazide. In combination, the effects of the two drugs were additive. Both drugs were well tolerated either as monotherapy or in combination. Conclusion: Both candesartan and a low dose of hydrochlorothiazide are effective and well-tolerated antihypertensive agents in isolated systolic hypertension with additive effects in combination. Candesartan was more effective than hydrochlorothiazide, although it is possible that dose adjustment only of candesartan could have enhanced its relative effectiveness.
引用
收藏
页码:246 / 254
页数:9
相关论文
共 45 条
[11]   The relationships between dose and antihypertensive effect of four AT1-receptor blockers.: Differences in potency and efficacy [J].
Elmfeldt, D ;
Olofsson, B ;
Meredith, P .
BLOOD PRESSURE, 2002, 11 (05) :293-301
[12]  
Elmfeldt D, 1997, J HUM HYPERTENS, V11, pS49
[13]   The efficacy and tolerability of losartan versus atenolol in patients with isolated systolic hypertension [J].
Farsang, C ;
Garcia-Puig, J ;
Niegowska, J ;
Baiz, AQ ;
Vrijens, F ;
Bortman, G .
JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2000, 18 (06) :795-801
[14]  
Furberg CD, 2002, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V288, P2981
[15]   Elevated systolic blood pressure as a cardiovascular risk factor [J].
Kannel, WB .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2000, 85 (02) :251-255
[16]   Effects of losartan on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients with isolated systolic hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy -: A Losartan Intervention For Endpoint Reduction (LIFE) substudy [J].
Kjeldsen, SE ;
Dahlöf, B ;
Devereux, RB ;
Julius, S ;
Aurup, P ;
Edelman, J ;
Beevers, G ;
de Faire, U ;
Fyhrquist, F ;
Ibsen, H ;
Kristianson, K ;
Lederballe-Pedersen, O ;
Lindholm, LH ;
Nieminen, MS ;
Omvik, P ;
Oparil, S ;
Snapinn, S ;
Wedel, H .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2002, 288 (12) :1491-1498
[17]   Comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of combination tablets containing candesartan cilexetil and hydrochlorothiazide or losartan and hydrochlorothiazide in patients with moderate to severe hypertension - Results of the CARLOS-Study [J].
Koenig, W .
CLINICAL DRUG INVESTIGATION, 2000, 19 (04) :239-246
[18]   Effects and tolerability at irbesartan versus enalapril in patients with severe hypertension [J].
Larochelle, P ;
Flack, JM ;
Marbury, TC ;
Sareli, P ;
Krieger, EM ;
Reeves, RA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1997, 80 (12) :1613-&
[19]   ON MAKING MULTIPLE COMPARISONS IN CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL PHARMACOLOGY AND PHYSIOLOGY [J].
LUDBROOK, J .
CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL PHARMACOLOGY AND PHYSIOLOGY, 1991, 18 (06) :379-392
[20]   Angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor blockade in hypertensive women:: Benefits of candesartan cilexetil versus enalapril or hydrochlorothiazide [J].
Malmqvist, K ;
Kahan, T ;
Dahl, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2000, 13 (05) :504-511