Preservation of hearing in cochlear implant surgery: Advantages of combined electrical and acoustical speech processing

被引:357
作者
Gantz, BJ
Turner, C
Gfeller, KE
Lowder, MW
机构
[1] Univ Iowa, Roy J & Lucille A Carver Coll Med, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Iowa City, IA USA
[2] Univ Iowa, Dept Speech Pathol & Audiol, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[3] Univ Iowa, Sch Music, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
关键词
Hearing Preservation; cochlear implant; hybrid cochlear implant; hearing in noise;
D O I
10.1097/01.MLG.0000157695.07536.D2
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Objectives/Hypothesis. This study documents the importance of preserving residual low-frequency acoustic hearing as those with more residual hearing are selected for cochlear implantation. Surgical strategies used for hearing preservation with a short hybrid cochlear implant are outlined. The benefits of preserved residual low-frequency hearing, improved word understanding in noise, and music appreciation are described. Study Design: Multicenter, prospective, single-subject design. Methods. Records were reviewed of 21 individuals participating in an Food and Drug Administration (FDA) feasibility clinical trial who have received an Iowa/Nucleus 10 mm electrode. A second group of subjects receiving implants at the University of Iowa that have used the 10 mm device between 2 years and 6 months were also reviewed. Outcome measures included standardized tests of monosyllabic word understanding, spondees in noise, and common melody recognition. Results. Low-frequency hearing was maintained in all individuals immediately postoperative. One subject lost hearing at 2.5 months postoperative after a viral infection. The group has averaged a loss of -9 dB low-frequency acoustic hearing between 125 and 1,000 Hz. Monosyllabic word understanding scores at 6 months for a group being followed for an FDA clinical trial using the implant plus hearing aids was 69% correct. For the long-term group receiving implants at Iowa, monosyllabic word understanding in those who have used the device between 6 months and 2 years is 79%. Other important findings include improved recognition of speech in noise (9 dB improvement) as compared with standard cochlear implant recipients who were matched for speech recognition in quiet and near normal recognition of common melodies. Conclusion. The surgical strategies outlined have been successful in preservation of low-frequency hearing in 96% of individuals. Combined electrical and acoustical speech processing has enabled this group of volunteers to gain improved word understanding as compared with their preoperative hearing with bilateral hearing aids and a group of individuals receiving a standard cochlear implant with similar experience with their device. The improvement of speech in noise and melody recognition is attributed to the ability to distinguish fine pitch differences as the result of preserved residual low-frequency acoustic hearing. Preservation of low-frequency acoustic hearing is important for improving speech in noise and music appreciation for the hearing impaired, both of which are important in real-life situations.
引用
收藏
页码:796 / 802
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Speech Prosody Perception in Cochlear Implant Users With and Without Residual Hearing
    Marx, Mathieu
    James, Christopher
    Foxton, Jessica
    Capber, Amandine
    Fraysse, Bernard
    Barone, Pascal
    Deguine, Olivier
    EAR AND HEARING, 2015, 36 (02) : 239 - 248
  • [42] Amplitude Parameters Are Predictive of Hearing Preservation in a Randomized Controlled Trial of Intracochlear Electrocochleography During Cochlear Implant Surgery
    Harris, Michael S.
    Koka, Kanth
    Thompson-Harvey, Adam
    Harvey, Erin
    Riggs, William J.
    Saleh, Shaza
    Holder, Jordan T.
    Dwyer, Robert T.
    Prentiss, Sandra M.
    Lefler, Shannon M.
    Kozlowski, Kristin
    Hiss, Meghan M.
    Ortmann, Amanda J.
    Nelson-Bakkum, Erin R.
    Buechner, Andreas
    Salcher, Rolf
    Harvey, Steven A.
    Hoffer, Michael E.
    Bohorquez, Jorge E.
    Alzhrani, Farid
    Alshihri, Rana
    Almuhawas, Fida
    Danner, Christopher J.
    Friedland, David R.
    Seidman, Michael D.
    Lenarz, Thomas
    Telischi, Fred F.
    Labadie, Robert F.
    Buchman, Craig A.
    Adunka, Oliver F.
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2024, 45 (08) : 887 - 894
  • [43] Effective use of the spectral information in speech processing of cochlear implant
    Guan Tian
    Gong Qin
    Ye Datian
    PROGRESS IN NATURAL SCIENCE-MATERIALS INTERNATIONAL, 2007, 17 (03) : 334 - 339
  • [44] Effective use of the spectral information in speech processing of cochlear implant
    GUAN Tian
    Research Centre of Biomedical Engineering
    ProgressinNaturalScience, 2007, (03) : 334 - 339
  • [45] Phase-sensitive Speech Enhancement for Cochlear Implant Processing
    Jafari, Pourya S.
    Kang, Hou-Yong
    Wang, Xiaosong
    Fu, Qian-Jie
    Jiang, Hui
    2011 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ACOUSTICS, SPEECH, AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2011, : 5104 - 5107
  • [46] Hearing preservation in cochlear implant recipients: A cross-sectional cohort study
    Kant, Ellen
    Jwair, Saad
    Thomeer, Hans G. X. M.
    CLINICAL OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2022, 47 (03) : 495 - 499
  • [47] Long-term Hearing Preservation in Electric Acoustic Cochlear Implant Candidates
    Sprinzl, Georg Mathias
    Schoerg, Philipp
    Edlinger, Stefan Herwig
    Magele, Astrid
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2020, 41 (06) : 750 - 757
  • [48] A method for determining precise electrical hearing thresholds in cochlear implant users
    Rader, Tobias
    Doms, Philipp
    Adel, Youssef
    Weissgerber, Tobias
    Strieth, Sebastian
    Baumann, Uwe
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2018, 57 (07) : 502 - 509
  • [49] Comparison of speech perception in pediatric CLARION® cochlear implant and hearing aid users
    Svirsky, MA
    Meyer, TA
    ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY, 1999, 108 (04) : 104 - 109
  • [50] Speech perception for cochlear implant patients using hearing aids on the unimplanted ear
    Madell, JR
    Sislian, N
    Hoffman, R
    COCHLEAR IMPLANTS, 2004, 1273 : 223 - 226