On the use of computed radiography plates for quality assurance of intensity modulated radiation therapy dose distributions

被引:3
|
作者
Day, R. A. [1 ]
Sankar, A. P. [1 ]
Nailon, W. H. [1 ]
MacLeod, A. S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Western Gen Hosp, Dept Oncol Phys, Edinburgh Canc Ctr, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, Midlothian, Scotland
关键词
computed radiography; intensity modulated radiation therapy; IMRT; quality assurance; dosimetry; FILM DOSIMETRY; QUANTITATIVE-EVALUATION; DIODE-ARRAY; IMRT; VERIFICATION; SOFTWARE; PHANTOM;
D O I
10.1118/1.3525841
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: As traditional film is phased out in most radiotherapy centers, computed radiography (CR) systems are increasingly being purchased as a replacement. CR plates can be used for patient imaging, but may also be used for a variety of quality assurance (QA) purposes and can be calibrated in terms of dose. This study looks at their suitability for verification of intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) dose distributions. Methods: A CR plate was calibrated in terms of the relative dose and the stability of response over 1 year was studied. The effect of exposing the CR plate to ambient light and of using different time delays before scanning was quantified. The CR plate was used to verify the relative dose distributions for ten IMRT patients and the results were compared to those obtained using a two dimensional (2D) diode array. Results: Exposing the CR plate to 10 s of ambient light between irradiation (174 cGy) and scanning erased approximately 80% of the signal. Changes in delay time between irradiation and scanning also affected the measurement results. The signal on the plate was found to decay at a rate of approximately 3.6 cGy/min in the first 10 min after irradiation. The use of a CR plate for IMRT patient-specific QA resulted in a significantly lower distance to agreement (DTA) and gamma pass rate than when using a 2D diode array for the measurement. This was primarily due to the over-response of the CR phosphor to low energy scattered radiation. For the IMRT QA using the CR plate, the average gamma pass rate was 97.3%. For the same IMRT QA using a diode array, the average gamma pass rate was 99.7%. The gamma criteria used were 4% dose difference and 4 mm DTA for head and neck treatments and 3% dose difference and 3 mm DTA for prostate treatments. The gamma index tolerance was 1. The lowest 10% of the dose distribution was excluded from all gamma and DTA analyses. Conclusions: Although the authors showed that CR plates can be used for patient specific IMRT QA, the practical problems such as the over-response to low energy scatter and signal fading with light exposure and time mean that alternative detectors such as radiochromic film or diode arrays will be a more sensible choice for most radiotherapy departments. (c) 2011 American Association of Physicists in Medicine. [DOI: 10.1118/1.3525841]
引用
收藏
页码:632 / 645
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A retrospective analysis for patient-specific quality assurance of volumetric-modulated arc therapy plans
    Li, Guangjun
    Wu, Kui
    Peng, Guang
    Zhang, Yingjie
    Bai, Sen
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2014, 39 (04) : 309 - 313
  • [32] Computed radiography dose data mining and surveillance as an ongoing quality assurance improvement process
    Stewart, Brent K.
    Kanal, Kalpana M.
    Perdue, James R.
    Mann, Frederick A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2007, 189 (01) : 7 - 11
  • [33] Inverse Verification of the Dose Distribution for Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Patient-specific Quality Assurance Using Dynamic MLC Log Files
    Lee, Jeong-Woo
    Park, Jeong-Hoon
    Chung, Jin-Beom
    Park, Ji-Yeon
    Choe, Bo-Young
    Suh, Tae-Suk
    Lee, Doo-Hyun
    Hong, Semie
    Kang, Min-Young
    Choi, Kyoung-Sik
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY, 2009, 55 (04) : 1649 - 1656
  • [34] Intensity modulated radiation therapy: Analysis of patient specific quality control results, experience of Rene-Gauducheau Centre
    Chiavassa, S.
    Brunet, G.
    Gaudaire, S.
    Munos-Llagostera, C.
    Delpon, G.
    Lisbona, A.
    CANCER RADIOTHERAPIE, 2011, 15 (04): : 265 - 269
  • [35] Gamma evaluation combined with isocenter optimal matching in intensity modulated radiation therapy quality assurance
    Jino Bak
    Jin Hwa Choi
    Suk Won Park
    Kwangwoo Park
    Sungho Park
    Journal of the Korean Physical Society, 2015, 67 : 2131 - 2137
  • [36] VERIDOS: A new tool for quality assurance for intensity modulated radiotherapy
    Wiezorek, T
    Schwedas, M
    Scheithauer, M
    Salz, H
    Bellemann, M
    Wendt, TG
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2002, 178 (12) : 732 - 736
  • [37] Development of multi-planar dose verification by use of a flat panel EPID for intensity-modulated radiation therapy
    Nakaguchi Y.
    Araki F.
    Kouno T.
    Ono T.
    Hioki K.
    Radiological Physics and Technology, 2013, 6 (1) : 226 - 232
  • [38] Intensity modulated radiation therapy
    Maingon, P.
    Marchesi, V.
    Crehange, G.
    BULLETIN DU CANCER, 2010, 97 (07) : 759 - 768
  • [39] Incorporation of gantry angle correction for 3D dose prediction in intensity-modulated radiation therapy
    Sumida, Iori
    Yamaguchi, Hajime
    Kizaki, Hisao
    Aboshi, Keiko
    Tsujii, Mari
    Yamada, Yuji
    Yagi, Masashi
    Ogawa, Kazuhiko
    JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH, 2015, 56 (03) : 594 - 605
  • [40] Evaluation of bladder dose in intensity-modulated radiation therapy of the prostate
    Higgins, P. D.
    Weaver, R.
    Dusenbery, K. E.
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2006, 31 (03) : 197 - 200