HCC screening: assessment of an abbreviated non-contrast MRI protocol

被引:40
|
作者
Chan, Michael Vinchill [1 ,2 ]
McDonald, Stephen J. [1 ]
Ong, Yang-Yi [1 ]
Mastrocostas, Katerina [1 ]
Ho, Edwin [1 ]
Huo, Ya Ruth [3 ]
Santhakumar, Cositha [4 ]
Lee, Alice Unah [4 ]
Yang, Jessica [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Concord Repatriat Gen Hosp, Dept Radiol, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Concord Repatriat Gen Hosp, Fac Med, Clin Sch, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ New South Wales, Bankstown Campbelltown Hosp, South Western Sydney Clin Sch, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Concord Repatriat Gen Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
Carcinoma (hepatocellular); Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging; Liver cirrhosis; Magnetic resonance imaging; Screening; HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA; LESION CHARACTERIZATION; DIAGNOSTIC PERFORMANCE; MAGNETIC-RESONANCE; LIVER; ACCURACY; CT; ULTRASONOGRAPHY; METAANALYSIS; ASSOCIATION;
D O I
10.1186/s41747-019-0126-1
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) guidelines recommend ultrasound screening in high-risk patients. However, in some patients, ultrasound image quality is suboptimal due to factors such as hepatic steatosis, cirrhosis, and confounding lesions. Our aim was to investigate an abbreviated non-contrast magnetic resonance imaging (aNC-MRI) protocol as a potential alternative screening method. Methods A retrospective study was performed using consecutive liver MRI studies performed over 3 years, with set exclusion criteria. The unenhanced T2-weighted, T1-weighted Dixon, and diffusion-weighted sequences were extracted from MRI studies with a known diagnosis. Each anonymised aNC-MRI study was read by three radiologists who stratified each study into either return to 6 monthly screening or investigate with a full contrast-enhanced MRI study. Results A total of 188 patients were assessed; 28 of them had 42 malignant lesions, classified as Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System 4, 5, or M. On a per-patient basis, aNC-MRI had a negative predictive value (NPV) of 97% (95% confidence interval [CI] 95-98%), not significantly different in patients with steatosis (99%, 95% CI 93-100%) and no steatosis (97%, 95% CI 94-98%). Per-patient sensitivity and specificity were 85% (95% CI 75-91%) and 93% (95% CI 90-95%). Conclusion Our aNC-MRI HCC screening protocol demonstrated high specificity (93%) and NPV (97%), with a sensitivity (85%) comparable to that of ultrasound and gadoxetic acid contrast-enhanced MRI. This screening method was robust to hepatic steatosis and may be considered an alternative in the case of suboptimal ultrasound image quality.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of diagnostic performance of non-contrast MRI and abbreviated MRI using gadoxetic acid in initially diagnosed hepatocellular carcinoma patients: a simulation study of surveillance for hepatocellular carcinomas
    Sunyoung Whang
    Moon Hyung Choi
    Joon-Il Choi
    Seo Yeon Youn
    Dong Hwan Kim
    Sung Eun Rha
    European Radiology, 2020, 30 : 4150 - 4163
  • [22] Deep Learning-Accelerated Non-Contrast Abbreviated Liver MRI for Detecting Malignant Focal Hepatic Lesions: Dual-Center Validation
    Park, So Hyun
    Choi, Moon Hyung
    Kim, Bohyun
    Lee, Hyun-Soo
    Yoon, Sungjin
    Lee, Young Joon
    Nickel, Dominik
    Benkert, Thomas
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2025, 26 (04) : 333 - 345
  • [23] Diagnosis of recurrent HCC: intraindividual comparison of gadoxetic acid MRI and extracellular contrast-enhanced MRI
    Yim, Jae Hyun
    Kim, Young Kon
    Min, Ji Hye
    Lee, Jisun
    Kang, Tae Wook
    Lee, Soon Jin
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2019, 44 (07) : 2366 - 2376
  • [24] Comparison of biannual ultrasonography and annual non-contrast liver magnetic resonance imaging as surveillance tools for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with liver cirrhosis (MAGNUS-HCC): a study protocol
    Hyun A Kim
    Kyung Ah Kim
    Joon-Il Choi
    Jeong Min Lee
    Chang Hee Lee
    Tae Wook Kang
    Young-Mi Ku
    Su Lim Lee
    Yang Shin Park
    Jeong Hee Yoon
    Seong Hyun Kim
    Moon Hyung Choi
    BMC Cancer, 17
  • [25] Evaluation of an abbreviated screening MRI protocol for patients at risk for hepatocellular carcinoma
    Jennifer Y. Lee
    Eugene J. Huo
    Stefanie Weinstein
    Charmaine Santos
    Alexander Monto
    Carlos U. Corvera
    Judy Yee
    Thomas A. Hope
    Abdominal Radiology, 2018, 43 : 1627 - 1633
  • [26] Contrast Enhanced MRI in the Diagnosis of HCC
    Niendorf, Eric
    Spilseth, Benjamin
    Wang, Xiao
    Taylor, Andrew
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2015, 5 (03) : 383 - 398
  • [27] Exam quality of ultrasound and dynamic contrast-enhanced abbreviated MRI and impact on early-stage HCC detection
    El Dahan, Karim Seif
    Yokoo, Takeshi
    Mendiratta-Lala, Mishal
    Fetzer, David
    Davenport, Matthew
    Daher, Darine
    Rich, Nicole E.
    Yang, Edward
    Parikh, Neehar D.
    Singal, Amit G.
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2024, : 2097 - 2109
  • [28] Abbreviated MRI for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Screening and Surveillance
    An, Julie Y.
    Pena, Miguel A.
    Cunha, Guilherme M.
    Booker, Michael T.
    Taouli, Bachir
    Yokoo, Takeshi
    Sirlin, Claude B.
    Fowler, Kathryn J.
    RADIOGRAPHICS, 2020, 40 (07) : 1916 - 1931
  • [29] Comparative efficacy of an optimal exam between ultrasound versus abbreviated MRI for HCC screening in NAFLD cirrhosis: A prospective study
    Huang, Daniel Q.
    Fowler, Kathryn J.
    Liau, Joy
    Cunha, Guilherme M.
    Louie, Ashley L.
    An, Julie Y.
    Bettencourt, Ricki
    Jung, Jinho
    Gitto, Zachary
    Hernandez, Christie
    Lopez, Scarlett J.
    Gupta, Hersh
    Sirlin, Claude B.
    Marks, Robert M.
    Loomba, Rohit
    ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2022, 55 (07) : 820 - 827
  • [30] Diagnostic per-lesion performance of a simulated gadoxetate disodium-enhanced abbreviated MRI protocol for hepatocellular carcinoma screening
    Tillman, B. G.
    Gorman, J. D.
    Hru, J. M.
    Lee, M. H.
    King, M. C.
    Sirlin, C. B.
    Marks, R. M.
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2018, 73 (05) : 485 - 493