Central corneal thickness measurement with Pentacam, Orbscan II, and ultrasound devices before and after laser refractive surgery for myopia

被引:68
作者
Hashemi, Hassan [1 ]
Mehravaran, Shiva
机构
[1] Univ Teheran Med Sci, Sch Med, Dept Ophthalmol, Tehran, Iran
[2] Noor Eye Hosp, Noor Ophthalmol Res Ctr, Tehran, Iran
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.05.040
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To determine the agreement in central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements between the gold standard method of ultrasound (US) pachymetry (UP-1000, Nidek) and 2 noncontact systems based on Scheimpflug imaging (Pentacam, Oculus) and scanning-slit topography (Orbscan II, Bausch & Lomb) in myopic eyes before and after laser refractive surgery. SETTING: Noor vision Correction Center, Tehran, Iran. METHODS: In this prospective study, 30 consecutive patients having refractive surgery for myopia were enrolled. All 60 eyes were examined with the 3 devices preoperatively and 6 weeks after surgery; the US measurements were performed last. The Pentacam and Orbscan II CCT readings were compared with the US readings. Both the original and corrected Orbscan II readings were used in the analyses. RESULTS: The mean CCT readings with US, Pentacam, and Orbscan II were, respectively, 555 mu m, 548 mu m, and 580 mu m before surgery and 478 mu m, 468 mu m, and 474 mu m after surgery. Preoperatively, the 95% limits of agreement (LoA) with US were -31 mu m and +19 mu m for the Pentacam device and -5 mu m and +57 mu m for the Orbscan II device. Postoperatively, the LoA were -40 mu m and +19 mu m and -51 mu m and +50 mu m, respectively. Corrected Orbscan II measurements gave 95% LoA of -48 mu m and +6 mu m before surgery and -85 mu m and +5 mu m after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Refractive surgery had a modest effect on the agreement between Pentacam readings and US measurements. With Orbscan II, the 95% LoA width nearly doubled after surgery. Although the Pentacam seems to show better agreement than Orbscan II, especially after refractive surgery, it is not advisable to use the 3 devices interchangeably in every clinical situation.
引用
收藏
页码:1701 / 1707
页数:7
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Central corneal thickness measurement with the Pentacam Scheimpflug system, optical low-coherence reflectometry pachymeter, and ultrasound pachymetry [J].
Barkana, Y ;
Gerber, Y ;
Elbaz, U ;
Schwartz, S ;
Ken-Dror, G ;
Avni, I ;
Zadok, D .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2005, 31 (09) :1729-1735
[2]   The reliability of central corneal thickness measurements by ultrasound and by Orbscan system in schoolchildren [J].
Basmak, Hikmet ;
Sahin, Afsun ;
Yildirim, Nilgun .
CURRENT EYE RESEARCH, 2006, 31 (7-8) :569-575
[3]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[4]   Accuracy of Orbscan optical pachymetry in corneas with haze [J].
Boscia, F ;
La Tegola, MG ;
Alessio, G ;
Sborgia, C .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2002, 28 (02) :253-258
[5]   Comparison of corneal thickness measurements using ultrasound and Orbscan slit-scanning topography in normal and post-LASIK eyes [J].
Chakrabarti, HS ;
Craig, JP ;
Brahma, A ;
Malik, TY ;
McGhee, CNJ .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2001, 27 (11) :1823-1828
[6]  
Cheng ACK, 2006, J REFRACT SURG, V22, P363
[7]   Comparison of corneal pachymetry using ultrasound and Orbscan II [J].
Fakhry, MA ;
Artola, A ;
Belda, JL ;
Ayala, MJ ;
Alió, JL .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2002, 28 (02) :248-252
[8]   Orbscan global pachymetry: Analysis of repeated measures [J].
Fam, HB ;
Lim, KL ;
Reinstein, DZ .
OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 2005, 82 (12) :1047-1053
[9]   Corneal pachymetry in normal and keratoconic eyes: Orbscan II versus ultrasound [J].
Gherghel, D ;
Hosking, SL ;
Mantry, S ;
Banerjee, S ;
Naroo, SA ;
Shah, S .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2004, 30 (06) :1272-1277
[10]  
Giessler S, 2001, J REFRACT SURG, V17, P385