In vitro cytotoxicity of five glass-ionomer cements

被引:92
作者
Costa, CAD
Hebling, J
Garcia-Godoy, F
Hanks, CT
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo State, UNESP, Sch Dent, Dept Physiol & Pathol, BR-14801903 Araraquara, SP, Brazil
[2] Univ Sao Paulo State, UNESP, Sch Dent, Dept Orthodont & Pediat Dent, BR-14801903 Araraquara, SP, Brazil
[3] Nova SE Univ, Coll Dent Med, Dept Restorat Dent, Ft Lauderdale, FL 33328 USA
[4] Nova SE Univ, Coll Dent Med, Dept Pediat Dent, Ft Lauderdale, FL 33328 USA
[5] Univ Michigan, Sch Dent, Dept Oral Med Pathol & Oncol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
cytotoxicity; glass-ionomer cement; culture; odontoblast;
D O I
10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00253-9
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
To evaluate the cytotoxic effects of five glass-ionomer cements (GICs) on an odontoblast cell line (MDPC-23), disks of every material were prepared and divided into Group 1: Vitrebond, Group 2: Vitremer, Group 3: Fuji IILC, Group 4: Fuji IX GP, Group 5: Ketac-Molar, Group 6: Z-100 (positive control). In Group 7, phosphate-buffered saline solution (negative control) was applied on filter paper. After placing the samples in the bottom of wells, the cells (30,000 cells/cm(2)) were plated and incubated for 72 h. The cell number was counted, the cell morphology was assessed by scanning electron microscopy and the cell metabolism was evaluated using methyltetrazolium assay. The statistical analysis of Kruskal-Wallis was used to determine if the scores obtained for the cell metabolism and number of cells were different at the 95% confidence level. In groups 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 the materials decreased the cell number by 74.5% 75.5%, 45.5%, 29.5%, 32.5%, and 88.5%, respectively. In groups 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, the experimental GICs reduced the cell metabolism by 79%, 84%, 54%, 40%, and 42.5%, respectively. Despite the fact that all experimental materials were cytotoxic to the MDPC-23 cells, the GICs were the least cytotoxic. On the other hand, the RMGICs caused the highest cytophatic effects. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:3853 / 3858
页数:6
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
Costa CAD, 1999, DENT MATER, V15, P434
[2]  
Costa CAD, 2000, DENT MATER, V16, P188
[3]  
CRAIG RG, 1997, RESTORATIVE DENT MAT, P146
[4]   H-1 AND C-13 NMR-STUDIES OF THE INTERACTION OF EUGENOL, PHENOL, AND TRIETHYLENEGLYCOL DIMETHACRYLATE WITH PHOSPHOLIPID LIPOSOMES AS A MODEL SYSTEM FOR ODONTOBLAST MEMBRANES [J].
FUJISAWA, S ;
KADOMA, Y ;
KOMODA, Y .
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1988, 67 (11) :1438-1441
[5]  
GERTZMAN GBR, 1979, J AM DENT ASSOC, V99, P637
[6]   Residual monomer additive release and variability in cytotoxicity of light-curing glass-ionomer cements and compomers [J].
Geurtsen, W ;
Spahl, W ;
Leyhausen, G .
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1998, 77 (12) :2012-2019
[7]  
*INT ORG STAND, 1992, 109931 ISO
[8]   Response of oral mucosal cells to glass ionomer cements [J].
Lewis, J ;
Nix, L ;
Schuster, G ;
Lefebvre, C ;
Knoernschild, K ;
Caughman, G .
BIOMATERIALS, 1996, 17 (11) :1115-1120
[9]   Biocompatibility of various light-curing and one conventional glass-ionomer cement [J].
Leyhausen, G ;
Abtahi, M ;
Karbakhsch, M ;
Sapotnick, A ;
Geurtsen, W .
BIOMATERIALS, 1998, 19 (06) :559-564
[10]  
Majd ES, 2003, BIOMATERIALS, V24, P3