Equal-quantile rules in resource allocation with uncertain needs

被引:4
作者
Long, Yan [1 ]
Sethuraman, Jay [2 ]
Xue, Jingyi [3 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[2] Columbia Univ, New York, NY 10027 USA
[3] Singapore Management Univ, Singapore, Singapore
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Resource allocation; Uncertain needs; Equal-quantile rules; Utilitarian social welfare function; Waste and deficit; Coordinality; GAME-THEORETIC ANALYSIS; FAIR DIVISION; PROGRESSIVE TAXATION; AWARDS RULE; BANKRUPTCY; PRIORITY; COST; ADJUDICATION; SOLIDARITY; EQUITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jet.2021.105350
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
A group of agents have uncertain needs on a resource, which must be allocated before uncertainty re-solves. We propose a parametric class of division rules we call equal-quantile rules. The parameter lambda of an equal-quantile rule is the maximal probability of satiation imposed on agents - for each agent, the prob-ability that his assignment is no less than his realized need is at most lambda. It determines the extent to which the resource should be used to satiate agents. If the resource is no more than the sum of the agents' lambda-quantile assignments, it is fully allocated and the rule equalizes the probabilities of satiation across agents. Otherwise, each agent just receives his lambda-quantile assignment. The equal-quantile class is characterized by four axioms, conditional strict ranking, continuity, double consistency, and coordinality. All are variants of familiar properties in the literature on deterministic fair division problems. Moreover, the rules are optimal with respect to two utilitarian objectives. The optimality results not only provide welfare interpretations of lambda, but also show how the rules balance the concerns for generating waste and deficit across agents. (c) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:45
相关论文
共 76 条
  • [41] Moulin H., 2002, Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare, V1, P289, DOI [DOI 10.1016/S1574-0110(02)80010-8, 10.1016/S1574-0110(02)80010-8]
  • [42] The Bipartite Rationing Problem
    Moulin, Herve
    Sethuraman, Jay
    [J]. OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2013, 61 (05) : 1087 - 1100
  • [43] ORDINAL INTERPERSONAL COMPARISONS IN BARGAINING
    NIELSEN, LT
    [J]. ECONOMETRICA, 1983, 51 (01) : 219 - 221
  • [44] A PROBLEM OF RIGHTS ARBITRATION FROM THE TALMUD
    ONEILL, B
    [J]. MATHEMATICAL SOCIAL SCIENCES, 1982, 2 (04) : 345 - 371
  • [45] The newsvendor problem: Review and directions for future research
    Qin, Yan
    Wang, Ruoxuan
    Vakharia, Asoo J.
    Chen, Yuwen
    Seref, Michelle M. H.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2011, 213 (02) : 361 - 374
  • [46] Pre-positioning of emergency supplies for disaster response
    Rawls, Carmen G.
    Turnquist, Mark A.
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART B-METHODOLOGICAL, 2010, 44 (04) : 521 - 534
  • [47] Quantile Maximization in Decision Theory
    Rostek, Marzena
    [J]. REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2010, 77 (01) : 339 - 371
  • [48] Roth, 1979, LECT NOTES EC MATH S, V170
  • [49] Shapley L.S., 1967, Utility Comparison and the Theory of Games
  • [50] Ordinal cost sharing
    Sprumont, Y
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC THEORY, 1998, 81 (01) : 126 - 162