Equal-quantile rules in resource allocation with uncertain needs

被引:4
作者
Long, Yan [1 ]
Sethuraman, Jay [2 ]
Xue, Jingyi [3 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[2] Columbia Univ, New York, NY 10027 USA
[3] Singapore Management Univ, Singapore, Singapore
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Resource allocation; Uncertain needs; Equal-quantile rules; Utilitarian social welfare function; Waste and deficit; Coordinality; GAME-THEORETIC ANALYSIS; FAIR DIVISION; PROGRESSIVE TAXATION; AWARDS RULE; BANKRUPTCY; PRIORITY; COST; ADJUDICATION; SOLIDARITY; EQUITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jet.2021.105350
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
A group of agents have uncertain needs on a resource, which must be allocated before uncertainty re-solves. We propose a parametric class of division rules we call equal-quantile rules. The parameter lambda of an equal-quantile rule is the maximal probability of satiation imposed on agents - for each agent, the prob-ability that his assignment is no less than his realized need is at most lambda. It determines the extent to which the resource should be used to satiate agents. If the resource is no more than the sum of the agents' lambda-quantile assignments, it is fully allocated and the rule equalizes the probabilities of satiation across agents. Otherwise, each agent just receives his lambda-quantile assignment. The equal-quantile class is characterized by four axioms, conditional strict ranking, continuity, double consistency, and coordinality. All are variants of familiar properties in the literature on deterministic fair division problems. Moreover, the rules are optimal with respect to two utilitarian objectives. The optimality results not only provide welfare interpretations of lambda, but also show how the rules balance the concerns for generating waste and deficit across agents. (c) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:45
相关论文
共 76 条
  • [1] Choice under aggregate uncertainty
    Al-Najjar, Nabil I.
    Pomatto, Luciano
    [J]. THEORY AND DECISION, 2016, 80 (02) : 187 - 209
  • [2] OPTIMAL INVENTORY POLICY
    Arrow, Kenneth J.
    Harris, Theodore
    Marschak, Jacob
    [J]. ECONOMETRICA, 1951, 19 (03) : 250 - 272
  • [3] Coherent measures of risk
    Artzner, P
    Delbaen, F
    Eber, JM
    Heath, D
    [J]. MATHEMATICAL FINANCE, 1999, 9 (03) : 203 - 228
  • [4] GAME THEORETIC ANALYSIS OF A BANKRUPTCY PROBLEM FROM THE TALMUD
    AUMANN, RJ
    MASCHLER, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC THEORY, 1985, 36 (02) : 195 - 213
  • [5] Banker R.D., 1981, Joint Cost Allocations, P110
  • [6] How to cope with division problems under interval uncertainty of claims?
    Branzei, R
    Dimitrov, D
    Pickl, S
    Tijs, S
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UNCERTAINTY FUZZINESS AND KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2004, 12 (02) : 191 - 200
  • [7] Ordinal aggregation and quantiles
    Chambers, Christopher P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC THEORY, 2007, 137 (01) : 416 - 431
  • [8] Taxation and poverty
    Chambers, Christopher P.
    Moreno-Ternero, Juan D.
    [J]. SOCIAL CHOICE AND WELFARE, 2017, 48 (01) : 153 - 175
  • [9] AN AXIOMATIZATION OF QUANTILES ON THE DOMAIN OF DISTRIBUTION FUNCTIONS
    Chambers, Christopher P.
    [J]. MATHEMATICAL FINANCE, 2009, 19 (02) : 335 - 342
  • [10] Group order preservation and the proportional rule for the adjudication of conflicting claims
    Chambers, CP
    Thomson, W
    [J]. MATHEMATICAL SOCIAL SCIENCES, 2002, 44 (03) : 235 - 252