Bullying at work and work-related stress in healthcare workers: a cross sectional study

被引:0
作者
De Sio, S. [1 ]
Cedrone, F. [2 ]
Buomprisco, G. [1 ]
Perri, R. [1 ]
Nieto, H. A. [3 ]
Mucci, N. [4 ]
Greco, E. [5 ]
机构
[1] Sapienza Univ Rome, Res Unit Occupat Med, Rome, Italy
[2] GD Annunzio Univ Chieti Pescara, Postgrad Sch Hyg & Prevent Med, Dept Med & Aging, Chieti, Italy
[3] Univ Buenos Aires, Sch Occupat Med, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
[4] Univ Florence, Dept Expt & Clin Med, Florence, Italy
[5] Link Campus Univ, Res Dept, Rome, Italy
来源
ANNALI DI IGIENE MEDICINA PREVENTIVA E DI COMUNITA | 2020年 / 32卷 / 02期
关键词
Psychosocial risks; bullying at work; healthcare workers; work-related stress; MANAGEMENT STANDARDS; HSE QUESTIONNAIRE; WORKPLACE; PERCEPTION;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. Bullying is a serious and growing problem affecting a significant proportion of healthcare professionals, a professional category exposed to work-related stress. Workplace bullying has been defined as a set of negative behaviours consisting in harassment, offense or negative influence on work that are directed to the members of the organization and that occur regularly and repeatedly over a period, becoming part of the context of work Study design. We performed a cross-sectional study using the HSE questionnaire and defining the sample size considering the number of healthcare workers of a big hospital and then calculating it with EpiInfo (TM) software. 191 people have been enrolled. Methods. The study was divided into three steps. The first one to identify, among the workers, those who were exposed to bullying at work and those who were not. The second one has been aimed at assessing the presence of work-related stress through the administration of the HSE questionnaire. The third step has been aimed at performing the statistical analysis of the data. For each single domain explored by the questionnaire the score obtained was treated as a linear variable and the median and interquartile range (IQR) was calculated. After, a non-parametric analysis (Wilcoxon rank-sum test) was performed in order to define the statistical significance of the observed differences. Results. All the 191 questionnaires were self-administered by the Health Care Workers under study and correctly filled in without any multiple or missing responses. Considering the scores obtained to question n. 21, that investigates "bullying at work", we obtained two groups: High-Exposure Group (total, males and females), and Low-Exposure Group (total, males and females). In the High-Exposure Group, two critical domains were found: Demands and Control (total, male and female samples). The differences with the Low-Exposure Group were statistically significant. In the Low-Exposure Group the critical domain was Manager Support (total and female samples). The differences with the High Exposure Group were not statistically significant. Conclusions. This study aimed to show how the exposure to bullying can influence the perception of psychosocial risks. It seems that the workers most exposed to bullying also have worse scores on the HSE questionnaire, particularly for two domains: Demands and Control. That is consistent with the most recent scientific literature.
引用
收藏
页码:109 / 116
页数:8
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] Andersson J., 2001, REPORT HARASSMENT WO
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1986, REPORT JOINT INT LAB
  • [3] Workplace Bullying among Healthcare Workers
    Ariza-Montes, Antonio
    Muniz, Noel M.
    Jose Montero-Simo, Maria
    Angel Araque-Padilla, Rafael
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2013, 10 (08): : 3121 - 3139
  • [4] Systematic review: Work-related stress and the HSE Management Standards
    Brookes, K.
    Limbert, C.
    Deacy, C.
    O'Reilly, A.
    Scott, S.
    Thirlaway, K.
    [J]. OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE-OXFORD, 2013, 63 (07): : 463 - 472
  • [5] The perception of psychosocial risks through the HSE questionnaire of a population of neurophysiology technicians: a cross-sectional study
    Cedrone, F.
    Lungo, F.
    Feliciangeli, A.
    Muccino, F.
    Greco, E.
    [J]. CLINICA TERAPEUTICA, 2018, 169 (06): : E281 - E286
  • [6] Stress at work: development of the Stress Perception Questionnaire of Rome (SPQR), an ad hoc questionnaire for multidimensional assessment of work related stress
    Cinti, M. E.
    Cannavo, M.
    Fioravanti, M.
    [J]. CLINICA TERAPEUTICA, 2018, 169 (03): : E114 - E119
  • [7] 'Management Standards' work-related stress in the UK: Practical development
    Cousins, R
    Mackay, CJ
    Clarke, SD
    Kelly, C
    Kelly, PJ
    McCaig, RH
    [J]. WORK AND STRESS, 2004, 18 (02) : 113 - 136
  • [8] Cox T., 1993, STRESS RES STRESS MA
  • [9] Cox T., 2000, RES WORK RELATED STR
  • [10] De Sio S, 2018, EUR REV MED PHARMACO, V22, P9012, DOI 10.26355/eurrev_201812_16672