In vitro propagation and evaluation of morphophysiologic parameters of grapevine rootstocks

被引:7
|
作者
Borghezan, M
de Moraes, LKA
Moreira, FM
da Silva, AL
机构
[1] Univ Fed Santa Catarina, Bolista PIBIC CNPQ, BR-88040900 Florianopolis, SC, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Santa Catarina, Bolista CNPq RHAE, BR-88040900 Florianopolis, SC, Brazil
[3] Ist Agr San Michele Adige, ISMAA, I-38010 Trent, Italy
[4] Univ Fed Santa Catarina, Dept Fitotecn, BR-88040900 Florianopolis, SC, Brazil
关键词
Vitis; micropropagation; biomass; stomata; chlorophyll;
D O I
10.1590/S0100-204X2003000700001
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Micropropagation of selected genotypes can be valuable to achieve demand for elite plants with genetic fidelity and high sanitary quality of grapevine (Vitis spp.) in Santa Catarina State, Brazil. The objective of this work was to propagate grapevine rootstocks in vitro and to evaluate important morphophysiologic parameters for the plants micropropagation and acclimatization. Axillary buds of the rootstocks grapevine VR043-43, VR039-16, Paulsen 1103, R110, SO4 and Kober 5BB were inoculated in DSD1 culture medium. Rates of 42% of explants were established in vitro. There was variation in growth, leaf area and dry weight among the genotypes. Paulsen 1103 revealed superior features in vitro for length of the stem (6.2 cm), biomass production (34.8 mg) and leaf area (18.1 cm(2)). The chlorophyll content showed variation among the rootstocks and the environment of the culture, ranging from 0.7 to 2.8 mg/g in fresh weight for R110 (in vitro) and VR043-43 (ex vitro), respectively. The highest (216.4/mm(2)) and the lowest (119.2/mm(2)) stomata number were shown by VR039-16 cultivated in vitro and by SO4 ex vitro, respectively In the acclimatization stage, the mean of planting stock survival rate was 90.3 +/- 1.1% per genotype. The evaluated grapevine rootstocks present morphophysiologic parameters appropriated to in vitro propagation and ex vitro transference.
引用
收藏
页码:783 / 789
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] In vitro-culture and propagation of grapevine rootstocks: evaluation studies
    Gisbert, Carmina
    Caceres, A.
    Frances, A.
    IN VITRO CELLULAR & DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY-PLANT, 2018, 54 : S68 - S68
  • [2] Evaluation of aluminium tolerance in grapevine rootstocks
    Cancado, G. M. A.
    Ribeiro, A. P.
    Pineros, M. A.
    Miyata, L. Y.
    Alvarenga, A. A.
    Villa, F.
    Pasqual, M.
    Purgatto, E.
    VITIS, 2009, 48 (04) : 167 - 173
  • [3] In Vitro Propagation of Citrus Rootstocks
    Sharma, Suneel
    Prakash, Atam
    Tele, Ajinath
    NOTULAE BOTANICAE HORTI AGROBOTANICI CLUJ-NAPOCA, 2009, 37 (01) : 84 - 88
  • [4] In vitro storage of micropropagated grapevine rootstocks at low temperature
    Alzubi, Hussein
    Yepes, Luz Marcela
    Fuchs, Marc
    IN VITRO CELLULAR & DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY-PLANT, 2019, 55 (03) : 334 - 341
  • [5] Effect of Grapevine Rootstocks on Qualitative Parameters of the Cerason Variety
    Tethal, Jiri
    Baron, Mojmir
    Sotolar, Radek
    Ailer, Stefan
    Sochor, Jiri
    CZECH JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCES, 2015, 33 (06) : 570 - 579
  • [6] Evaluation of New Rootstocks for Grapevine: Nutritional Aspects
    Porro, D.
    Pedo, S.
    Bertoldi, D.
    Bortolotti, L.
    Failla, O.
    Zamboni, M.
    VII INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON MINERAL NUTRITION OF FRUIT CROPS, 2013, 984 : 109 - 115
  • [7] In vitro selection for tolerance to magnesium deficiency in grapevine rootstocks
    Bouquet, A.
    Chabbert, A. -M.
    Danglot, Y.
    VITIS, 1990, : 445 - 445
  • [8] In vitro storage of micropropagated grapevine rootstocks at low temperature
    Hussein Alzubi
    Luz Marcela Yepes
    Marc Fuchs
    In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Plant, 2019, 55 : 334 - 341
  • [9] In Vitro Propagation of Some Grape Rootstocks
    El-Agamy, S. Z.
    El-Mahdy, T. K.
    Mohamed, A. A.
    I INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON BIOTECHNOLOGY OF FRUIT SPECIES: BIOTECHFRUIT2008, 2009, 839 : 125 - 131
  • [10] In vitro propagation of four rose rootstocks
    Kucharska, D
    Gruchala, A
    Orlikowska, T
    PROPAGATION OF ORNAMENTAL PLANTS, 2006, 6 (01): : 44 - 50