DISCRIMINATION IN SELECTION DECISIONS: INTEGRATING STEREOTYPE FIT AND INTERDEPENDENCE THEORIES

被引:52
作者
Lee, Sun Young [1 ]
Pitesa, Marko [2 ]
Thau, Stefan [3 ]
Pillutla, Madan M. [4 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Dept Management Sci & Innovat, London WC1E 6BT, England
[2] Univ Maryland, Robert H Smith Sch Business, Management & Org Dept, College Pk, MD USA
[3] INSEAD, Org Behav, Singapore, Singapore
[4] London Business Sch, Org Behav, London, England
关键词
APPLICANT RACE; AGE-DISCRIMINATION; INTERVIEW RATINGS; OLDER WORKERS; META-ANALYSIS; PERFORMANCE; EMPLOYMENT; SIMILARITY; SEX; INFORMATION;
D O I
10.5465/amj.2013.0571
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We integrate stereotype fit and interdependence theories to propose a model that explains how and why decision makers discriminate in selection decisions. Our model suggests that decision makers draw on stereotypes about members of different social groups to infer the degree to which candidates possess the specific ability required for the task. Decision makers perceive candidates that have a greater ability required for the task as less (more) instrumental to their personal outcomes if they expect to compete (cooperate) with the candidate, and they discriminate in favor of candidates that are perceived as more instrumental to them. We tested our theory in the context of racial (Studies 1-3) and age (Study 4) discrimination in selection decisions with all-male samples and found evidence consistent with our predictions. By explaining when and why decision makers discriminate in favor of, but also against, members of their own social group, this research may help to explain the mixed support for the dominant view that decision makers exhibit favoritism toward candidates that belong to the same social group. In addition, our research demonstrates the importance of considering the largely overlooked role of interdependent relationships within the organization in order to understand discrimination in organizations.
引用
收藏
页码:789 / 812
页数:24
相关论文
共 117 条
[1]  
Allport Gordon W., 1954, NATURE PREJUDICE
[2]   The routinization of innovation research: a constructively critical review of the state-of-the-science [J].
Anderson, N ;
De Dreu, CKW ;
Nijstad, BA .
JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 2004, 25 (02) :147-173
[3]  
[Anonymous], J OCCUPATIONAL PSYCH
[4]  
[Anonymous], CAN YOU COUNT POSTP
[5]  
[Anonymous], ENF LIT STAT
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2013, RIS AS AM
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2010, FREQ OCC SURN CENS 2
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1991, YOU JUST DONT UNDERS
[9]  
[Anonymous], RECRUITMENT PROCESS
[10]  
[Anonymous], RAC MAIN