Further Clarifying Prospective and Inhibitory Intolerance of Uncertainty: Factorial and Construct Validity of Test Scores From the Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale

被引:106
作者
Hong, Ryan Y. [1 ]
Lee, Stephanie S. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Psychol, Singapore 117570, Singapore
关键词
intolerance of uncertainty; factor structure; construct validity; prospective; inhibitory; GENERALIZED ANXIETY DISORDER; BEHAVIORAL ACTIVATION; PROBLEM ORIENTATION; PARALLEL ANALYSIS; SYMPTOMS; WORRY; NUMBER; INVENTORY; VULNERABILITIES; SPECIFICITY;
D O I
10.1037/pas0000074
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
The Intolerance to Uncertainty Scale (IUS) was developed to measure a dispositional tendency to react negatively to uncertain events, regardless of the occurrence probability of those events. Recent evidence suggests a 2-factor structure underlying the IUS; 1 factor measuring a prospective aspect (i.e., desire for predictability) and the other assessing an inhibitory aspect (i.e., uncertainty paralysis). The factorial and construct validity of the IUS test scores among undergraduate students in Singapore were examined in the present research using exploratory (n = 565) and confirmatory (n = 898) factor analyses. Results indicated that a 2-factor model was preferred over a unitary-factor model. The construct validity of the IUS (and subscale) scores was examined using a comprehensive nomological network of psychopathology and personality/affectivity variables. Differential relations were observed for the prospective and inhibitory components, providing support that the 2 subscales assessed unique aspects of the intolerance of uncertainty construct. An 18-item modified version of IUS was also proposed and its test scores had stronger validity evidence than scores from the widely used 12-item version.
引用
收藏
页码:605 / 620
页数:16
相关论文
共 95 条
[71]  
Molina S., 1994, WORRYING PERSPECTIVE, P265
[72]   Meta-Analysis of the Relations of Anxiety Sensitivity to the Depressive and Anxiety Disorders [J].
Naragon-Gainey, Kristin .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2010, 136 (01) :128-150
[73]   Rethinking Rumination [J].
Nolen-Hoeksema, Susan ;
Wisco, Blair E. ;
Lyubomirsky, Sonja .
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2008, 3 (05) :400-424
[74]   A PROSPECTIVE-STUDY OF DEPRESSION AND POSTTRAUMATIC STRESS SYMPTOMS AFTER A NATURAL DISASTER - THE 1989 LOMA-PRIETA EARTHQUAKE [J].
NOLENHOEKSEMA, S ;
MORROW, J .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1991, 61 (01) :115-121
[75]  
Norton Peter J., 2007, Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, V36, P240, DOI 10.1080/16506070701628065
[76]   SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer's MAP test [J].
O'Connor, BP .
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS INSTRUMENTS & COMPUTERS, 2000, 32 (03) :396-402
[77]   A cognitive-behavioral model of anxiety in social phobia [J].
Rapee, RM ;
Heimberg, RG .
BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY, 1997, 35 (08) :741-756
[78]   The looming maladaptive style: Anxiety, danger, and schematic processing [J].
Riskind, JH ;
Williams, NL ;
Gessner, TL ;
Chrosniak, LD ;
Cortina, JM .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 79 (05) :837-852
[79]   Short-term predictive effects of the looming cognitive anxiety disorder symptoms under restrictive methodological conditions [J].
Riskind, John H. ;
Tzur, Dana ;
Williams, Nathan L. ;
Mann, Brittany ;
Shahar, Golan .
BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY, 2007, 45 (08) :1765-1777
[80]   Negative problem orientation (Part II): construct validity and specificity to worry [J].
Robichaud, M ;
Dugas, MJ .
BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY, 2005, 43 (03) :403-412