Phase I trial of temozolomide and protracted irinotecan in pediatric patients with refractory solid tumors

被引:93
|
作者
Wagner, LM
Crews, KR
Iacono, LC
Houghton, PJ
Fuller, CE
McCarville, MB
Goldsby, RE
Albritton, K
Stewart, CF
Santana, VM
机构
[1] Univ Utah, Primary Childrens Med Ctr, Div Pediat Hematol Oncol, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[2] St Jude Childrens Res Hosp, Dept Pharmaceut Sci, Memphis, TN 38105 USA
[3] St Jude Childrens Res Hosp, Dept Mol Pharmacol, Memphis, TN 38105 USA
[4] St Jude Childrens Res Hosp, Dept Pathol, Memphis, TN 38105 USA
[5] St Jude Childrens Res Hosp, Dept Diagnost Imaging, Memphis, TN 38105 USA
[6] St Jude Childrens Res Hosp, Dept Hematol Oncol, Memphis, TN 38105 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-03-0175
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: The purpose is to estimate the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of temozolomide and irinotecan given on a protracted schedule in 28-day courses to pediatric patients with refractory solid tumors. ` Experimental Design: Twelve heavily pretreated patients received 56 courses of oral temozolomide at 100 mg/ m(2)/day for 5 days combined with i.v. irinotecan given daily for 5 days for 2 consecutive weeks at either 10 mg/m(2)/day (n = 6) or 15 mg/m(2)/day In = 6). We assessed toxicity, the pharmacokinetics of temozolomide and irinotecan, and the DNA repair phenotype in tumor samples. Results: Two patients experienced dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) at the higher dose level; one had grade 4 diarrhea, whereas the other had bacteremia with grade 2 neutropenia. In contrast, no patient receiving temozolomide and 10 mW m(2)/day irinotecan experienced DLT. Myelosuppression was minimal and noncumulative. No pharmacokinetic interaction was observed. Drug metabolite exposures at the MTD were similar to exposures previously associated with single-agent antitumor activity. One complete response, two partial responses, and one minor response were observed in Ewing's sarcoma and neuroblastoma patients previously treated with stem cell transplant. Responding patients had low or absent O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase expression in tumor tissue. Conclusions: The MTD using this schedule was temozolomide (100 mg/m(2)/day) and irinotecan (10 mWm/day), with DLT being diarrhea and infection. Drug clearance was similar to single-agent values, and clinically relevant SN-38 lactone and MTIC exposures were achieved at the MTD. As predicted by xenograft models, this combination and schedule appears to be tolerable and active in pediatric solid tumors. Evaluation of a 21-day schedule is planned.
引用
收藏
页码:840 / 848
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Irinotecan plus temozolomide in refractory or relapsed pediatric solid tumors
    Hernandez-Marques, C.
    Lassaletta-Atienza, A.
    Ruiz Hernandez, A.
    Blumenfeld Olivares, J. A.
    Arce Abaitua, B.
    Cormenzana Carpio, M.
    Madero Lopez, L.
    ANALES DE PEDIATRIA, 2013, 79 (02): : 68 - 74
  • [2] A phase I study of cetuximab and irinotecan in pediatric patients (pts) with refractory solid tumors
    Trippett, T. M.
    Kuttesch, J.
    Herzog, C.
    Boklan, J.
    Bagatell, R.
    Hunger, S.
    Arceci, R.
    Lu, H.
    Langer, C.
    Gore, L.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 25 (18)
  • [3] A Phase I Study of Vincristine, Irinotecan, Temozolomide and Bevacizumab (Vitb) in Pediatric Patients with Relapsed Solid Tumors
    Venkatramani, Rajkumar
    Malogolowkin, Marcio
    Davidson, Tom B.
    May, William
    Sposto, Richard
    Mascarenhas, Leo
    PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (07):
  • [4] A phase I study of gefitinib and irinotecan (IRN) in pediatric patients with refractory solid tumors.
    Furman, WL
    Daw, NC
    Crews, KR
    Stewart, CF
    McCarville, B
    Santana, VM
    Hawkins, D
    Rodriguez-Galindo, C
    Navid, F
    Houghton, PJ
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2004, 22 (14) : 804S - 804S
  • [5] Phase I Study of Bevacizumab Plus Irinotecan in Pediatric Patients with Recurrent/Refractory Solid Tumors
    Okada, Keiko
    Yamasaki, Kai
    Tanaka, Chika
    Fujisaki, Hiroyuki
    Osugi, Yuko
    Hara, Junichi
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 43 (11) : 1073 - 1079
  • [6] Extended Phase I Evaluation of Vincristine, Irinotecan, Temozolomide, and Antibiotic in Children With Refractory Solid Tumors
    McNall-Knapp, Rene Y.
    Williams, Cydni N.
    Reeves, Elaine N.
    Heideman, Richard L.
    Meyer, William H.
    PEDIATRIC BLOOD & CANCER, 2010, 54 (07) : 909 - 915
  • [7] Irinotecan and gemcitabine in patients with solid tumors: Phase I trial
    Lima, CMSR
    Leong, SS
    Sherman, CA
    Perkel, JA
    Putman, T
    Safa, AR
    Green, MR
    ONCOLOGY-NEW YORK, 2002, 16 (05): : 19 - 24
  • [8] Phase 1 Study of Oxaliplatin and Irinotecan in Pediatric Patients With Refractory Solid Tumors
    McGregor, Lisa M.
    Spunt, Sheri L.
    Furman, Wayne L.
    Stewart, Clinton F.
    Schaiquevich, Paula
    Krailo, Mark D.
    Speights, RoseAnne
    Ivy, Percy
    Adamson, Peter C.
    Blaney, Susan M.
    CANCER, 2009, 115 (08) : 1765 - 1775
  • [9] Phase I study of irinotecan in pediatric patients with malignant solid tumors
    Mugishima, H
    Matsunaga, T
    Yagi, K
    Asami, K
    Mimaya, J
    Suita, S
    Kishimoto, T
    Sawada, T
    Tsuchida, Y
    Kaneko, M
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC HEMATOLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2002, 24 (02) : 94 - 100
  • [10] Phase I study of regorafenib in combination with vincristine and irinotecan in pediatric patients with recurrent or refractory solid tumors.
    Casanova, Michela
    Bautista, Francisco
    Hewson, Quentin Campbell
    Makin, Guy
    Marshall, Lynley V.
    Verschuur, Arnauld
    Canete, Adela
    Corradini, Nadege
    Ploeger, Bart
    Mueller, Udo
    Zebger-Gong, Hong
    Chung, John Woojune
    Geoerger, Birgit
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 38 (15)