A real-world, observational study of erenumab for migraine prevention in Canadian patients

被引:14
作者
Becker, Werner J. [1 ]
Spacey, Sian [2 ]
Leroux, Elizabeth [3 ]
Giammarco, Rose [4 ]
Gladstone, Jonathan [5 ]
Christie, Suzanne [6 ]
Akaberi, Arash [7 ]
Power, G. Sarah [8 ]
Minhas, Jagdeep K. [9 ]
Mancini, Johanna [7 ]
Rochdi, Driss [10 ]
Filiz, Ayca [10 ]
Bastien, Natacha [10 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calgary, Dept Clin Neurosci, Calgary, AB, Canada
[2] Univ British Columbia, Div Neurol, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[3] Brunswick Med Ctr, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[4] Hamilton Headache Clin, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[5] Gladstone Headache Clin, Toronto, ON, Canada
[6] Ottawa Headache Ctr Inc, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[7] IQVIA Solut Canada Inc, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[8] IQVIA Solut Canada Inc, Mississauga, ON, Canada
[9] IQVIA Solut Canada Inc, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[10] Novartis Canada, Dorval, PQ, Canada
来源
HEADACHE | 2022年 / 62卷 / 04期
关键词
chronic migraine; effectiveness; episodic migraine; erenumab; real-world; EPISODIC MIGRAINE; DOUBLE-BLIND; ADRENOMEDULLIN; EFFICACY; SAFETY; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1111/head.14291
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives To assess real-world effectiveness, safety, and usage of erenumab in Canadian patients with episodic and chronic migraine with prior ineffective prophylactic treatments. Background In randomized controlled trials, erenumab demonstrated efficacy for migraine prevention in patients with <= 4 prior ineffective prophylactic migraine therapies. The "Migraine prevention with AimoviG: Informative Canadian real-world study" (MAGIC) assessed real-world effectiveness of erenumab in Canadian patients with migraine. Methods MAGIC was a prospective open-label, observational study conducted in Canadian patients with chronic migraine (CM) and episodic migraine (EM) with two to six categories of prior ineffective prophylactic therapies. Participants were administered 70 mg or 140 mg erenumab monthly based on physician's assessment. Migraine attacks were self-assessed using an electronic diary and patient-reported outcome questionnaires. The primary outcome was the proportion of subjects achieving >= 50% reduction in monthly migraine days (MMD) after the 3-month treatment period. Results Among the 95 participants who mostly experienced two (54.7%) or three (32.6%) prior categories of ineffective prophylactic therapies and who initiated erenumab, treatment was generally safe and well tolerated; 89/95 (93.7%) participants initiated treatment with 140 mg erenumab. At week 12, 32/95 (33.7%) participants including 17/64 (26.6%) CM and 15/32 (48.4%) EM achieved >= 50% reduction in MMD while 30/86 (34.9%) participants including 19/55 (34.5%) CM and 11/31 (35.5%) EM achieved >= 50% reduction in MMD at week 24. Through patient-reported outcome questionnaires, 62/95 (65.3%) and 45/86 (52.3%) participants reported improvement of their condition at weeks 12 and 24, respectively. Physicians observed improvement in the condition of 78/95 (82.1%) and 67/86 (77.9%) participants at weeks 12 and 24, respectively. Conclusion One-third of patients with EM and CM achieved >= 50% MMD reduction after 3 months of erenumab treatment. This study provides real-world evidence of erenumab effectiveness, safety, and usage for migraine prevention in adult Canadian patients with multiple prior ineffective prophylactic treatments.
引用
收藏
页码:522 / 529
页数:8
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Efficacy and safety of erenumab (AMG334) in chronic migraine patients with prior preventive treatment failure: A subgroup analysis of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study [J].
Ashina, Messoud ;
Tepper, Stewart ;
Brandes, Jan Lewis ;
Reuter, Uwe ;
Boudreau, Guy ;
Dolezil, David ;
Cheng, Sunfa ;
Zhang, Feng ;
Lenz, Robert ;
Klatt, Jan ;
Mikol, Daniel D. .
CEPHALALGIA, 2018, 38 (10) :1611-1621
[2]   Patterns of Use and Reasons for Discontinuation of Prophylactic Medications for Episodic Migraine and Chronic Migraine: Results From the Second International Burden of Migraine Study (IBMS-II) [J].
Blumenfeld, Andrew M. ;
Bloudek, Lisa M. ;
Becker, Werner J. ;
Buse, Dawn C. ;
Varon, Sepideh F. ;
Maglinte, Gregory A. ;
Wilcox, Teresa K. ;
Kawata, Ariane K. ;
Lipton, Richard B. .
HEADACHE, 2013, 53 (04) :644-655
[3]   The Spectrum of Response to Erenumab in Patients With Episodic Migraine and Subgroup Analysis of Patients Achieving ≥50%, ≥75%, and 100% Response [J].
Broessner, Gregor ;
Reuter, Uwe ;
Bonner, Jo H. ;
Dodick, David W. ;
Hallstrom, Yngve ;
Picard, Hernan ;
Zhang, Feng ;
Lenz, Robert A. ;
Klatt, Jan ;
Mikol, Daniel D. .
HEADACHE, 2020, 60 (09) :2026-2040
[4]   ARISE: A Phase 3 randomized trial of erenumab for episodic migraine [J].
Dodick, David W. ;
Ashina, Messoud ;
Brandes, Jan Lewis ;
Kudrow, David ;
Lanteri-Minet, Michel ;
Osipova, Vera ;
Palmer, Kerry ;
Picard, Hernan ;
Mikol, Daniel D. ;
Lenz, Robert A. .
CEPHALALGIA, 2018, 38 (06) :1026-1037
[5]   Migraine [J].
Dodick, David W. .
LANCET, 2018, 391 (10127) :1315-1330
[6]   Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and migraine [J].
Durham, PL .
HEADACHE, 2006, 46 :S3-S8
[7]   Real-Life Response to Erenumab in a Therapy-Resistant Case Series of Migraine Patients From the Province of Quebec, Eastern Canada [J].
Eghtesadi, Marzieh ;
Leroux, Elizabeth ;
Page, Gabrielle .
CLINICAL DRUG INVESTIGATION, 2021, 41 (08) :733-739
[8]   A Controlled Trial of Erenumab for Episodic Migraine [J].
Goadsby, Peter J. ;
Reuter, Uwe ;
Hallstrom, Yngve ;
Broessner, Gregor ;
Bonner, Jo H. ;
Zhang, Feng ;
Sapra, Sandhya ;
Picard, Hernan ;
Mikol, Daniel D. ;
Lenz, Robert A. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2017, 377 (22) :2123-2132
[9]  
Guy W., 1976, ECDEU Assessment Manual for Psychopharmacology, P76, DOI DOI 10.1037/E591322011-001
[10]   Assessing the clinical significance of change scores recorded on subjective outcome measures [J].
Hurst, H ;
Bolton, J .
JOURNAL OF MANIPULATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2004, 27 (01) :26-35