The stratified multi-criteria decision-making method

被引:43
|
作者
Asadabadi, Mehdi Rajabi [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ New South Wales, Sch Business, Canberra, ACT, Australia
关键词
Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM); Concept of stratification (CST); SMCDM; Uncertainty; GREEN SUPPLIER EVALUATION; FUZZY-SETS; SELECTION; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.knosys.2018.07.002
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods generally require the decision maker to evaluate alternatives with respect to decision criteria and also to assign importance weightings to the criteria. Then, based on the assigned weightings, the best alternative can be selected. However, after a decision is made it often happens that the decision maker becomes doubtful whether the right weightings have been assigned to the criteria given that a variety of eventualities may occur in the near future. The main aim of this paper is to address this concern and improve the application of MCDM methods by addressing possible fluctuations in the criteria weightings. The recently proposed concept of stratification (CST) is used in conjunction with MCDM methods to stratify the decision environment. The method is then applied to a supplier selection problem. The stratified MCDM (SMCDM) approach is in its early stages only and requires further research to reach its maturity.
引用
收藏
页码:115 / 123
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Multi-Criteria Decision-Making
    Encheva, Sylvia
    MICBE '09: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 10TH WSEAS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTERS IN BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS, 2009, : 192 - +
  • [2] When is a Decision-Making Method Trustworthy? Criteria for Evaluating Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods
    Saaty, Thomas L.
    Ergu, Daji
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & DECISION MAKING, 2015, 14 (06) : 1171 - 1187
  • [3] A fuzzy multi-criteria emergency decision-making method
    Wu, Wen-Shuai
    Kou, Gang
    Peng, Yi
    Shi, Yong
    Xitong Gongcheng Lilun yu Shijian/System Engineering Theory and Practice, 2012, 32 (06): : 1298 - 1304
  • [4] Fuzzy α-discounting method for multi-criteria decision-making
    Karaman, Atilla
    Dagdeviren, Metin
    JOURNAL OF THE CHINESE INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERS, 2015, 38 (07) : 855 - 865
  • [5] Multiplicative multi-criteria analysis method for decision-making
    Zizovic, Miodrag M.
    Damljanovic, Nada
    Zizovic, Malisa R.
    MAEJO INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 10 (02) : 233 - 241
  • [6] Structure of multi-criteria decision-making
    Brugha, C
    JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2004, 55 (11) : 1156 - 1168
  • [7] SUBJECTIVE MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING
    ESHRAGH, F
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MAN-MACHINE STUDIES, 1980, 13 (01): : 117 - 141
  • [8] THE MOMENT INTEGRATED SOLUTION METHOD IN MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING
    Akan, Ercan
    Bayar, Sibel
    Elmas, Guldem
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING-THEORY APPLICATIONS AND PRACTICE, 2020, 27 (06): : 844 - 866
  • [9] APPLICATIONS OF WASPAS METHOD AS A MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING TOOL
    Chakraborty, Shankar
    Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras
    Antucheviciene, Jurgita
    ECONOMIC COMPUTATION AND ECONOMIC CYBERNETICS STUDIES AND RESEARCH, 2015, 49 (01): : 5 - 22
  • [10] Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method
    Rezaei, Jafar
    OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2015, 53 : 49 - 57