Machine Learning and Statistical Models to Predict Postpartum Hemorrhage

被引:104
作者
Venkatesh, Kartik K.
Strauss, Robert A.
Grotegut, Chad A.
Heine, R. Philip
Chescheir, Nancy C.
Stringer, Jeffrey S. A.
Stamilio, David M.
Menard, Katherine M.
Jelovsek, J. Eric
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Dept Obstet, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Dept Gynecol, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
[3] Duke Univ, Durham, NC 27706 USA
[4] Wake Forest Univ, Winston Salem, NC 27101 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
RISK-FACTORS; BLOOD-LOSS; MORBIDITY; VALIDATION; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1097/AOG.0000000000003759
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To predict a woman's risk of postpartum hemorrhage at labor admission using machine learning and statistical models. METHODS: Predictive models were constructed and compared using data from 10 of 12 sites in the U.S. Consortium for Safe Labor Study (2002-2008) that consistently reported estimated blood loss at delivery. The outcome was postpartum hemorrhage, defined as an estimated blood loss at least 1,000 mL. Fifty-five candidate risk factors routinely available on labor admission were considered. We used logistic regression with and without lasso regularization (lasso regression) as the two statistical models, and random forest and extreme gradient boosting as the two machine learning models to predict postpartum hemorrhage. Model performance was measured by C statistics (ie, concordance index), calibration, and decision curves. Models were constructed from the first phase (2002-2006) and externally validated (ie, temporally) in the second phase (2007-2008). Further validation was performed combining both temporal and site-specific validation. RESULTS: Of the 152,279 assessed births, 7,279 (4.8%, 95% CI 4.7-4.9) had postpartum hemorrhage. All models had good-to-excellent discrimination. The extreme gradient boosting model had the best discriminative ability to predict postpartum hemorrhage (C statistic: 0.93; 95% CI 0.92-0.93), followed by random forest (C statistic: 0.92; 95% CI 0.91-0.92). The lasso regression model (C statistic: 0.87; 95% CI 0.86-0.88) and logistic regression (C statistic: 0.87; 95% CI 0.86-0.87) had lower-but-good discriminative ability. The above results held with validation across both time and sites. Decision curve analysis demonstrated that, although all models provided superior net benefit when clinical decision thresholds were between 0% and 80% predicted risk, the extreme gradient boosting model provided the greatest net benefit. CONCLUSION: Postpartum hemorrhage on labor admission can be predicted with excellent discriminative ability using machine learning and statistical models. Further clinical application is needed, which may assist health care providers to be prepared and triage at-risk women.
引用
收藏
页码:935 / 944
页数:10
相关论文
共 52 条
  • [11] Collins GS, 2015, J CLIN EPIDEMIOL, V68, P112, DOI [10.1038/bjc.2014.639, 10.7326/M14-0697, 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.11.025, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.11.010, 10.1136/bmj.g7594, 10.1002/bjs.9736, 10.1186/s12916-014-0241-z, 10.7326/M14-0698]
  • [12] Council on Patient Safety in Women's Health Care, OBST HEM AIM
  • [13] Maternal Mortality and Morbidity in the United States: Where Are We Now?
    Creanga, Andreea A.
    Berg, Cynthia J.
    Ko, Jean Y.
    Farr, Sherry L.
    Tong, Van T.
    Bruce, F. Carol
    Callaghan, William M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2014, 23 (01) : 3 - 9
  • [14] Current applications of big data and machine learning in cardiology
    Cuocolo, Renato
    Perillo, Teresa
    De Rosa, Eliana
    Ugga, Lorenzo
    Petretta, Mario
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 16 (08) : 601 - 607
  • [15] Prevention and management of postpartum hemorrhage: a comparison of 4 national guidelines
    Dahlke, Joshua D.
    Mendez-Figueroa, Hector
    Maggio, Lindsay
    Hauspurg, Alisse K.
    Sperling, Jeffrey D.
    Chauhan, Suneet P.
    Rouse, Dwight J.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 213 (01) : 76.e1 - 76.e10
  • [16] Estimating blood loss: Can teaching significantly improve visual estimation?
    Dildy, GA
    Paine, AR
    George, NC
    Velasco, C
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 104 (03) : 601 - 606
  • [17] Clinical Validation of Risk Stratification Criteria for Peripartum Hemorrhage
    Dilla, Andrew J.
    Waters, Jonathan H.
    Yazer, Mark H.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 122 (01) : 120 - 126
  • [18] Artificial Intelligence in Health Care Will the Value Match the Hype?
    Emanuel, Ezekiel J.
    Wachter, Robert M.
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2019, 321 (23): : 2281 - 2282
  • [19] Automated early detection of obstetric complications: theoretic and methodologic considerations
    Escobar, Gabriel J.
    Gupta, Neeru R.
    Walsh, Eileen M.
    Soltesz, Lauren
    Terry, Stephanie M.
    Kipnis, Patricia
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 220 (04) : 297 - 307
  • [20] Decision Curve Analysis
    Fitzgerald, Mark
    Saville, Benjamin R.
    Lewis, Roger J.
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2015, 313 (04): : 409 - 410