Predicting Freeway Incident Duration Using Machine Learning

被引:19
|
作者
Hamad, Khaled [1 ]
Khalil, Mohamad Ali [2 ]
Alozi, Abdul Razak [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sharjah, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Sustainable Civil Infrastruct Syst Res Grp, Res Inst Sci & Engn, Sharjah, U Arab Emirates
[2] Univ Sharjah, Sustainable Civil Infrastruct Syst Res Grp, Res Inst Sci & Engn, Sharjah, U Arab Emirates
[3] Univ Sharjah, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Sharjah, U Arab Emirates
关键词
Machine learning; Incident duration; Houston TranStar; Neural networks; Support vector machine; Gaussian process regression; SUPPORT VECTOR REGRESSION; MODEL; FORECAST;
D O I
10.1007/s13177-019-00205-1
中图分类号
U [交通运输];
学科分类号
08 ; 0823 ;
摘要
Traffic incident duration provides valuable information for traffic management officials and road users alike. Conventional mathematical models may not necessarily capture the complex interaction between the many variables affecting incident duration. This paper summarizes the application of five state-of-the-art machine learning (ML) models for predicting traffic incident duration. More than 110,000 incident records with over 52 variables were retrieved from Houston TranStar data archive. The attempted ML techniques include: regression decision tree, support vector machine (SVM), ensemble tree (bagged and boosted), Gaussian process regression (GPR), and artificial neural networks (ANN). These methods are known to effectively handle extensive and complex datasets. Towards achieving the best modeling accuracy, the parameters of each of these models were fine-tuned. The results showed that the SVM and GPR models outperformed other techniques in terms of the mean absolute error (MAE) with the best model scoring an MAE of 14.34 min. On the other hand, the simple regression tree was the worst overall model with an MAE of 16.74 min. In terms of training time, a considerable difference was found between two groups of models: regression decision tree, ensemble tree, and ANN on one hand and SVM and GPR on the other. The former required shorter training time (less than one hour each) whereas the latter had training times ranging between 5 to 34 hours per model.
引用
收藏
页码:367 / 380
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Data Balancing Techniques for Predicting Student Dropout Using Machine Learning
    Mduma, Neema
    DATA, 2023, 8 (03)
  • [32] Predicting stock market index using fusion of machine learning techniques
    Patel, Jigar
    Shah, Sahli
    Thakkar, Priyank
    Kotecha, K.
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2015, 42 (04) : 2162 - 2172
  • [33] Predicting Benzene Concentration Using Machine Learning and Time Series Algorithms
    Menendez Garcia, Luis Alfonso
    Sanchez Lasheras, Fernando
    Garcia Nieto, Paulino Jose
    Alvarez de Prado, Laura
    Bernardo Sanchez, Antonio
    MATHEMATICS, 2020, 8 (12) : 1 - 21
  • [34] A Machine Learning Approach to Predicting Case Duration for Robot-Assisted Surgery
    Zhao, Beiqun
    Waterman, Ruth S.
    Urman, Richard D.
    Gabriel, Rodney A.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SYSTEMS, 2019, 43 (02)
  • [35] Prediction of Incident Solar Radiation Using a Hybrid Kernel Based Extreme Learning Machine
    Preeti, Rajni
    Bala, Rajni
    Singh, Ram Pal
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TOOLS, 2023, 32 (01)
  • [36] MACHINE LEARNING FOR PREDICTING OUTCOMES IN TRAUMA
    Liu, Nehemiah T.
    Salinas, Jose
    SHOCK, 2017, 48 (05): : 504 - 510
  • [37] Predicting Slope Stability Failure through Machine Learning Paradigms
    Dieu Tien Bui
    Moayedi, Hossein
    Gor, Mesut
    Jaafari, Abolfazl
    Foong, Loke Kok
    ISPRS INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEO-INFORMATION, 2019, 8 (09)
  • [38] Selection of contributing factors for predicting landslide susceptibility using machine learning and deep learning models
    Chen, Cheng
    Fan, Lei
    STOCHASTIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND RISK ASSESSMENT, 2023,
  • [39] Freeway automatic incident detection using learning models backpropagation, SVM and FuzzyARTMAP
    Kim, Daehyon
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF URBAN SCIENCES, 2013, 17 (01) : 109 - 116
  • [40] A Novel Machine Learning Model for Predicting Orthodontic Treatment Duration
    Volovic, James
    Badirli, Sarkhan
    Ahmad, Sunna
    Leavitt, Landon
    Mason, Taylor
    Bhamidipalli, Surya Sruthi
    Eckert, George
    Albright, David
    Turkkahraman, Hakan
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2023, 13 (17)