Predicting Freeway Incident Duration Using Machine Learning

被引:19
|
作者
Hamad, Khaled [1 ]
Khalil, Mohamad Ali [2 ]
Alozi, Abdul Razak [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sharjah, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Sustainable Civil Infrastruct Syst Res Grp, Res Inst Sci & Engn, Sharjah, U Arab Emirates
[2] Univ Sharjah, Sustainable Civil Infrastruct Syst Res Grp, Res Inst Sci & Engn, Sharjah, U Arab Emirates
[3] Univ Sharjah, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Sharjah, U Arab Emirates
关键词
Machine learning; Incident duration; Houston TranStar; Neural networks; Support vector machine; Gaussian process regression; SUPPORT VECTOR REGRESSION; MODEL; FORECAST;
D O I
10.1007/s13177-019-00205-1
中图分类号
U [交通运输];
学科分类号
08 ; 0823 ;
摘要
Traffic incident duration provides valuable information for traffic management officials and road users alike. Conventional mathematical models may not necessarily capture the complex interaction between the many variables affecting incident duration. This paper summarizes the application of five state-of-the-art machine learning (ML) models for predicting traffic incident duration. More than 110,000 incident records with over 52 variables were retrieved from Houston TranStar data archive. The attempted ML techniques include: regression decision tree, support vector machine (SVM), ensemble tree (bagged and boosted), Gaussian process regression (GPR), and artificial neural networks (ANN). These methods are known to effectively handle extensive and complex datasets. Towards achieving the best modeling accuracy, the parameters of each of these models were fine-tuned. The results showed that the SVM and GPR models outperformed other techniques in terms of the mean absolute error (MAE) with the best model scoring an MAE of 14.34 min. On the other hand, the simple regression tree was the worst overall model with an MAE of 16.74 min. In terms of training time, a considerable difference was found between two groups of models: regression decision tree, ensemble tree, and ANN on one hand and SVM and GPR on the other. The former required shorter training time (less than one hour each) whereas the latter had training times ranging between 5 to 34 hours per model.
引用
收藏
页码:367 / 380
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Predicting Phospholipidosis Using Machine Learning
    Lowe, Robert
    Glen, Robert C.
    Mitchell, John B. O.
    MOLECULAR PHARMACEUTICS, 2010, 7 (05) : 1708 - 1714
  • [22] Predicting Aquaculture Water Quality Using Machine Learning Approaches
    Li, Tingting
    Lu, Jian
    Wu, Jun
    Zhang, Zhenhua
    Chen, Liwei
    WATER, 2022, 14 (18)
  • [23] An Approach for Predicting Global Ionospheric TEC Using Machine Learning
    Tang, Jun
    Li, Yinjian
    Yang, Dengpan
    Ding, Mingfei
    REMOTE SENSING, 2022, 14 (07)
  • [24] Predicting slope safety using an optimized machine learning model
    Khajehzadeh, Mohammad
    Keawsawasvong, Suraparb
    HELIYON, 2023, 9 (12)
  • [25] Predicting photoresist sensitivity using machine learning
    Ghule, Balaji G.
    Kim, Minkyeong
    Jang, Ji-Hyun
    BULLETIN OF THE KOREAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2023, 44 (11) : 900 - 910
  • [26] Predicting Employee Attrition using Machine Learning
    Alduayj, Sarah S.
    Rajpoot, Kashif
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2018 13TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INNOVATIONS IN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (IIT), 2018, : 93 - 98
  • [27] Support vector machine models for freeway incident detection
    Cheu, RL
    Srinivasan, D
    Teh, ET
    2003 IEEE INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS PROCEEDINGS, VOLS. 1 & 2, 2003, : 238 - 243
  • [28] Optimized machine learning modelling for predicting the construction cost and duration of tunnelling projects
    Mahmoodzadeh, Arsalan
    Nejati, Hamid Reza
    Mohammadi, Mokhtar
    AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION, 2022, 139
  • [29] Predicting open interest in thermal coal futures using machine learning
    Jin, Bingzi
    Xu, Xiaojie
    MINERAL ECONOMICS, 2024,
  • [30] Rhythms of Victory: Predicting Professional Tennis Matches Using Machine Learning
    Lei, Yilin
    Lin, Ao
    Cao, Jianuo, Jr.
    IEEE ACCESS, 2024, 12 : 113608 - 113617