Structural comparisons of TIM barrel proteins suggest functional and evolutionary relationships between β-galactosidase and other glycohydrolases

被引:0
作者
Juers, DH
Huber, RE
Matthews, BW [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oregon, Inst Mol Biol, Howard Hughes Med Inst, Eugene, OR 97403 USA
[2] Univ Oregon, Dept Phys, Eugene, OR 97403 USA
关键词
beta-galactosidase; structural comparison; TIM-barrel proteins;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
beta-Galactosidase (lacZ) from Escherichia coli is a 464 kDa homotetramer. Each subunit consists of five domains, the third being an alpha/beta barrel that contains most of the active site residues. A comparison is made between each of the domains and a large set of proteins representative of all structures from the protein data bank. Many structures include an alpha/beta barrel. Those that are most similar to the alpha/beta barrel of E. coli beta-galactosidase have similar catalytic residues and belong to the so-called "4/7 superfamily" of glycosyl hydrolases. The structure comparison suggests that beta-amylase should also be included in this family. Of three structure comparison methods tested, the "ProSup" procedure of Zu-Kang and Sippl and the "Superimpose" procedure of Diederichs were slightly superior in discriminating the members of this superfamily, although all procedures were very powerful in identifying related protein structures. Domains 1, 2, and 4 of E. coli beta-galactosidase have topologies related to "jelly-roll barrels" and "immunoglobulin constant" domains. This fold also occurs in the cellulose binding domains (CBDs) of a number of glycosyl hydrolases. The fold of domain 1 of E. coli beta-galactosidase is closely related to some CBDs, and the domain contributes to substrate binding, but in a manner unrelated to cellulose binding by the CBDs. This is typical of domains 1, 2, 4, and 5, which appear to have been recruited to play roles in beta-galactosidase that are unrelated to the functions that such domains provide in other contexts. It is proposed that beta-galactosidase arose from a prototypical single domain alpha/beta barrel with an extended active site cleft. The subsequent incorporation of elements from other domains could then have reduced the size of the active site from a cleft to a pocket to better hydrolyze the disaccharide lactose and, at the same time, to facilitate the production of inducer, allolactose.
引用
收藏
页码:122 / 136
页数:15
相关论文
共 60 条
  • [1] ADAMS RM, 1994, J BIOL CHEM, V269, P5666
  • [2] Crystal structure of the beta-glycosidase from the hyperthermophilic archeon Sulfolobus solfataricus: Resilience as a key factor in thermostability
    Aguilar, CF
    Sanderson, I
    Moracci, M
    Ciaramella, M
    Nucci, R
    Rossi, M
    Pearl, LH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1997, 271 (05) : 789 - 802
  • [3] BASIC LOCAL ALIGNMENT SEARCH TOOL
    ALTSCHUL, SF
    GISH, W
    MILLER, W
    MYERS, EW
    LIPMAN, DJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1990, 215 (03) : 403 - 410
  • [4] BAIROCH A, 1997, THIS IS WEB SITE DES
  • [5] THE CRYSTAL-STRUCTURE OF A CYANOGENIC BETA-GLUCOSIDASE FROM WHITE CLOVER, A FAMILY-1 GLYCOSYL HYDROLASE
    BARRETT, T
    SURESH, CG
    TOLLEY, SP
    DODSON, EJ
    HUGHES, MA
    [J]. STRUCTURE, 1995, 3 (09) : 951 - 960
  • [6] The crystal structures of Sinapis alba myrosinase and a covalent glycosyl-enzyme intermediate provide insights into the substrate recognition and active-site machinery of an S-glycosidase
    Burmeister, WP
    Cottaz, S
    Driguez, H
    Iori, R
    Palmieri, S
    Henrissat, B
    [J]. STRUCTURE, 1997, 5 (05) : 663 - 675
  • [7] IMMUNOLOGICAL STUDY OF COMPLEMENTARY FRAGMENTS OF BETA-GALACTOSIDASE
    CELADA, F
    ULLMANN, A
    MONOD, J
    [J]. BIOCHEMISTRY, 1974, 13 (27) : 5543 - 5547
  • [8] CHEN L, 1993, J BIOL CHEM, V268, P13318
  • [9] DEREWENDA U, 1994, J BIOL CHEM, V269, P20811
  • [10] STRUCTURAL SUPERPOSITION OF PROTEINS WITH UNKNOWN ALIGNMENT AND DETECTION OF TOPOLOGICAL SIMILARITY USING A 6-DIMENSIONAL SEARCH ALGORITHM
    DIEDERICHS, K
    [J]. PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND GENETICS, 1995, 23 (02): : 187 - 195