Development and validation of a risk score for predicting atrial fibrillation recurrence after a first catheter ablation procedure - ATLAS score

被引:89
|
作者
Mesquita, Joao [1 ]
Ferreira, Antonio Miguel [1 ,2 ]
Cavaco, Diogo [1 ,2 ]
Costa, Francisco Moscoso [1 ,2 ]
Carmo, Pedro [1 ,2 ]
Marques, Hugo [3 ]
Morgado, Francisco [1 ]
Mendes, Miguel [1 ]
Adragao, Pedro [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Santa Cruz, Cardiol Dept, Av Prof Reinaldo dos Santos, P-2790134 Lisbon, Portugal
[2] Hosp Luz, Cardiol Dept, Lisbon, Portugal
[3] Hosp Luz, Radiol Dept, Lisbon, Portugal
来源
EUROPACE | 2018年 / 20卷
关键词
Atrial fibrillation; Atrial fibrillation recurrence; Pulmonary vein isolation; Radiofrequency catheter ablation; Prognosis; Risk score; PULMONARY VEIN ISOLATION; CIGARETTE-SMOKING; VOLUME; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; ASSOCIATION; FIBROSIS; OUTCOMES; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1093/europace/eux265
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aims Several predictors of relapse after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) have been established, but assessing each patient's individual risk remains challenging. Our aim was to develop and validate a score to estimate the risk of AF recurrence after the first radiofrequency pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) procedure. Methods and results Independent predictors of AF relapse were identified retrospectively in a two-centre registry of 1934 patients who underwent a first PVI procedure. Using the Cox regression hazard ratios of designated variables, a risk score was developed in a random sample of 50% of the patients (development cohort) and validated in the remaining (validation cohort) half. The accuracy and discriminative power of the predictive model were assessed in both subgroups. During a follow-up of 4.2 +/- 2.7 years, 522 patients (27%) relapsed. Five independent predictors of AF recurrence were identified and included in the score: age > 60 years (1 point), female sex (4 points), non-paroxysmal AF (2 points), current smoking (7 points) and indexed left atrial volume (1 point for each 10 mL/m(2)). The score showed good discriminative power (censored c-statistic of 0.75 in both cohorts). In the development group, AF relapse rates were 8, 11, and 17%/year for low (< 6 points), intermediate (6-10 points), and high-risk patients (> 10 points), respectively (P < 0.001). In the validation group, AF recurrence rates were 8, 11, and 18%/year, respectively (P < 0.001). Conclusion A simple risk score to estimate the rate of AF recurrence after ablation was developed and validated. An external assessment of its usefulness as a patient selection tool seems warranted.
引用
收藏
页码:F428 / F435
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Factors predicting the recurrence of atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation: A review
    Mo, Degang
    Wang, Mengmeng
    Zhang, Peng
    Dai, Hongyan
    Guan, Jun
    HELIYON, 2024, 10 (13)
  • [12] Novel risk score for predicting recurrence of atrial fibrillation after the Cryo-Maze procedure
    Kakuta, Takashi
    Fukushima, Satsuki
    Minami, Kimito
    Saito, Tetsuya
    Kawamoto, Naonori
    Tadokoro, Naoki
    Ikuta, Ayumi
    Kobayashi, Junjiro
    Fujita, Tomoyuki
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2021, 59 (06) : 1218 - 1225
  • [13] Prolonged PR Interval and Risk of Recurrence of Atrial Fibrillation After Catheter Ablation
    Wu, Jin-Tao
    Dong, Jian-Zeng
    Sang, Cai-Hua
    Tang, Ri-Bo
    Ma, Chang-Sheng
    INTERNATIONAL HEART JOURNAL, 2014, 55 (02) : 126 - 130
  • [14] Development and validation of the Atri-Risk Conduction Index risk score to predict risk of atrial fibrillation after typical atrial flutter ablation
    Grubb, Alex
    Aleong, Ryan
    Rosenberg, Michael A.
    Chang, Shu
    Padalia, Kishan
    Ashur, Carmel
    Adewumi, Joseph
    Saqi, Bilal
    Varela, Daniel
    Sandhu, Amneet
    Cerbin, Lukasz
    Barrett, Christopher
    Tumolo, Alexis Z.
    Varosy, Paul
    Zipse, Matthew M.
    Tzou, Wendy S.
    Garg, Lohit
    Sabzwari, Syed Rafay A.
    HEART RHYTHM, 2024, 21 (09) : 1621 - 1629
  • [15] New Score for Predicting Results after Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: VAT-DHF
    Nastasa, Alexandrina
    Bogdan, Stefan
    Iorgulescu, Corneliu
    Radu, Andrei Dan
    Craitoiu-Nirlu, Luminita
    Vatasescu, Radu Gabriel
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (01)
  • [16] Development and Validation of a Novel Prognostic Model Predicting the Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence Risk for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Patients Treated with Nifekalant During the First Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation
    Youzheng Dong
    Zhenyu Zhai
    Bo Zhu
    Shucai Xiao
    Yang Chen
    Anxue Hou
    Pengtao Zou
    Zirong Xia
    Jianhua Yu
    Juxiang Li
    Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy, 2023, 37 : 1117 - 1129
  • [17] Predicting atrial fibrillation ablation outcome: The CAAP-AF score
    Winkle, Roger A.
    Jarman, Julian W. E.
    Mead, R. Hardwin
    Engel, Gregory
    Kong, Melissa H.
    Fleming, William
    Patrawala, Rob A.
    HEART RHYTHM, 2016, 13 (11) : 2119 - 2125
  • [18] Echocardiographic predictors of atrial fibrillation recurrence after catheter ablation: A literature review
    Lizewska-Springer, Aleksandra
    Dabrowska-Kugacka, Alicja
    Lewicka, Ewa
    Drelich, Lukasz
    Krolak, Tomasz
    Raczak, Grzegorz
    CARDIOLOGY JOURNAL, 2020, 27 (06) : 848 - 856
  • [19] Higher coronary artery calcium score is associated with increased risk of atrial fibrillation recurrence after catheter ablation
    Fernandes, Sara Lopes
    Ladeiras-Lopes, Ricardo
    Silva, Mariana
    Silva, Gualter
    Cruz, Ines
    Diaz, Silvia O.
    Barros, Antonio S.
    Saraiva, Francisca
    Faria, Rita
    Almeida, Joao
    Fonseca, Paulo
    Goncalves, Helena
    Oliveira, Marco
    Ferreira, Nuno
    Primo, Joao
    Fontes-Carvalho, Ricardo
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2023, 17 (01) : 22 - 27
  • [20] Left atrial shape predicts recurrence after atrial fibrillation catheter ablation
    Bieging, Erik T.
    Morris, Alan
    Wilson, Brent D.
    McGann, Christopher J.
    Marrouche, Nassir F.
    Cates, Joshua
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2018, 29 (07) : 966 - 972