Load spatial pathway and spine loading: how does lift origin and destination influence low back response?

被引:23
作者
Davis, K [1 ]
Marras, W
机构
[1] Univ Cincinnati, Coll Med, Dept Environm Hlth, Low Back Biomech & Workplace Stress Lab, Cincinnati, OH 45267 USA
[2] Ohio State Univ, Biodynam Lab, Dept Ind Welding & Syst Engn, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
关键词
lifting; manual material handling; trunk motion; muscle recruitment strategy;
D O I
10.1080/00140130500182247
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
While heavy lifting has been identified as an important risk factor for low back disorders, little is known about workplace spatial layout - the relative positions of shelves and the impact of this on spine loads. The objective of the current study was to investigate how the relative positions of the load origin and destination impact three-dimensional spine loads. Seven females and seven males lifted an 11.4 kg box from an origin shelf to a destination shelf, each defined by height (elbow, knee and shoulder level) and asymmetry (608 clockwise, sagittally symmetric, 608 counter-clockwise) while their spine loading was assessed by an electromyographic-assisted model. The results indicated that the starting and destination heights and starting task asymmetry all had significant impact on spine compression (with an increase of between 400 and 1900 N when compared to the most neutral position) and lateral shear (with a 100 to 150 N increase) while the destination height impacted the anterior - posterior shear forces (with up to 400 N increase). The results of the current study emphasize the importance of proper workplace spatial layout, specifically the importance of specifying starting position of the load relative to the destination. Adjustment of the starting position will impact the three-dimensional spine loads while the destination height and asymmetry influence the shear forces. Furthermore, the influence of the specific pathway ( origin relative to destination) indicates there may be a potential preparatory muscle response leading to the loads on the spine. Thus, the pathway of the box plays an important role in the spine responses during lifting, in that longer and non-neutral pathways increase spine loads indicating the importance of the relative position of the origin and destination shelf.
引用
收藏
页码:1031 / 1046
页数:16
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]   Trunk kinematics of one-handed lifting, and the effects of asymmetry and load weight [J].
Allread, WG ;
Marras, WS ;
Parnianpour, M .
ERGONOMICS, 1996, 39 (02) :322-334
[2]   LOW-BACK DISORDERS IN AGRICULTURAL TRACTOR DRIVERS EXPOSED TO WHOLE-BODY VIBRATION AND POSTURAL STRESS [J].
BOVENZI, M ;
BETTA, A .
APPLIED ERGONOMICS, 1994, 25 (04) :231-241
[3]   SELF-REPORTED LOW-BACK SYMPTOMS IN URBAN BUS DRIVERS EXPOSED TO WHOLE-BODY VIBRATION [J].
BOVENZI, M ;
ZADINI, A .
SPINE, 1992, 17 (09) :1048-1059
[4]   Physical and psychosocial work-related risk factors associated with musculoskeletal symptoms among home care personnel [J].
Brulin, C ;
Gerdle, B ;
Granlund, B ;
Hoog, J ;
Knutson, A ;
Sundelin, G .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF CARING SCIENCES, 1998, 12 (02) :104-110
[5]   Assessment of the relationship between box weight and trunk kinematics: Does a reduction in box weight necessarily correspond to a decrease in spinal loading? [J].
Davis, KG ;
Marras, WS .
HUMAN FACTORS, 2000, 42 (02) :195-208
[6]   Reduction of spinal loading through the use of handles [J].
Davis, KG ;
Marras, WS ;
Waters, TR .
ERGONOMICS, 1998, 41 (08) :1155-1168
[7]   The effects of motion on trunk biomechanics [J].
Davis, KG ;
Marras, WS .
CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2000, 15 (10) :703-717
[8]   Evaluation of spinal loading during lowering and lifting [J].
Davis, KG ;
Marras, WS ;
Waters, TR .
CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 1998, 13 (03) :141-152
[9]   Weight and frequency effect on spinal loading in a bricklaying task [J].
deLooze, MP ;
Visser, B ;
Houting, I ;
vanRooy, MAG ;
vanDieen, JH ;
Toussaint, HM .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1996, 29 (11) :1425-1433
[10]  
DRURY CG, 1989, ERGONOMICS, V32, P565