The Divine Attributes and Non-personal Conceptions of God

被引:8
作者
Bishop, John [1 ]
Perszyk, Ken [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
[2] Univ Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand
来源
TOPOI-AN INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF PHILOSOPHY | 2017年 / 36卷 / 04期
关键词
Euteleology; Telos; Omnipotence; Omniscience; Divine goodness; Concepts of God; IMMUTABILITY; SIMPLICITY;
D O I
10.1007/s11245-016-9394-z
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
Analytical philosophers of religion widely assume that God is a person, albeit immaterial and of unique status, and the divine attributes are thus understood as attributes of this supreme personal being. Our main aim is to consider how traditional divine attributes may be understood on a non-personal conception of God. We propose that foundational theist claims make an all-of-Reality reference, yet retain God's status as transcendent Creator. We flesh out this proposal by outlining a specific non-personal, monist and 'naturalist' conception of God, which we call the 'euteleological' conception of God, and then considering euteleological interpretations of omnipotence (implicating divine agency, will and freedom), omniscience (implicating divine intellect and intelligence) and divine goodness.
引用
收藏
页码:609 / 621
页数:13
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]  
Adams MM, 2016, ALTERNATIVE CONCEPTS
[2]  
Alston WilliamP., 1989, Divine Nature and Human Language
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1999, HORRENDOUS EVILS GOO
[4]  
Bishop J, 2016, ALTERNATIVE CONCEPTS
[5]  
Bishop J, 2016, CONCEPT PERSONAL GOD
[7]   The normatively relativised logical argument from evil [J].
Bishop, John ;
Perszyk, Ken .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION, 2011, 70 (02) :109-126
[8]  
Bishop John., 2014, Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion, V5, P1
[9]  
Clarke W.Norris., 1994, EXPLORATIONS METAPHY
[10]  
Davies B., 2003, New Blackfriars, P371, DOI [10.1111/j.1741-2005.2003.tb06311.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1741-2005.2003.TB06311.X]