Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards 2022 (CHEERS 2022) statement: Updated reporting guidance for health economic evaluations

被引:11
作者
Husereau, Don [1 ,2 ]
Drummond, Michael [3 ]
Augustovski, Federico [4 ,5 ,6 ]
de Bekker-Grob, Esther [7 ]
Briggs, Andrew H. [8 ]
Carswell, Chris [9 ]
Caulley, Lisa [10 ,11 ,12 ,13 ]
Chaiyakunapruk, Nathorn [14 ]
Greenberg, Dan [15 ]
Loder, Elizabeth [16 ,17 ]
Mauskopf, Josephine [18 ]
Mullins, C. Daniel [19 ]
Petrou, Stavros [20 ]
Pwu, Raoh-Fang [21 ]
Staniszewska, Sophie [22 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ottawa, Sch Epidemiol & Publ Hlth, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[2] Inst Hlth Econ, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[3] Univ York, Ctr Hlth Econ, York, England
[4] Consejo Nacl Invest Cient & Tecn, Hlth Technol Assessment & Hlth Econ Dept, Inst Clin Effectiveness & Hlth Policy IECS, Buenos Aires, Argentina
[5] Univ Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
[6] CONICET Natl Sci & Tech Res Council, Buenos Aires, Argentina
[7] Erasmus Univ, Erasmus Sch Hlth Policy & Management, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[8] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, London, England
[9] Springer Nat, Adis Journals, Auckland, New Zealand
[10] Univ Ottawa, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[11] Ottawa Hosp Res Inst, Clin Epidemiol Program, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[12] Ottawa Hosp Res Inst, Ctr Journalol, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[13] Erasmus MC, Dept Epidemiol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[14] Univ Utah, Dept Pharmacotherapy, Coll Pharm, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[15] Ben Gurion Univ Negev, Fac Hlth Sci, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, Beer Sheva, Israel
[16] Harvard Med Sch, Boston, MA USA
[17] BMJ, London, England
[18] RTI Int, RTI Hlth Solut, Res Triangle Pk, NC USA
[19] Univ Maryland Baltimore, Sch Pharm, Baltimore, MD USA
[20] Univ Oxford, Nuffield Dept Primary Care Hlth Sci, Oxford, England
[21] Minist Hlth & Welf, Natl Hepatitis Program Off C, Taipei City, Taiwan
[22] Univ Warwick, Warwick Res Nursing, Warwick Med Sch, Warwick, England
来源
HEALTH POLICY OPEN | 2022年 / 3卷
关键词
Economic evaluation; Reporting guidance; Health economics; Health technology assessment; COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; CLINICAL-TRIALS; GUIDELINES; RECOMMENDATIONS; IMPACT; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1016/j.hpopen.2021.100063
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Health economic evaluations are comparative analyses of alternative courses of action in terms of their costs and consequences. The Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement, published in 2013, was created to ensure health economic evaluations are identifiable, interpretable, and useful for decision making. It was intended as guidance to help authors report accurately which health interventions were being compared and in what context, how the evaluation was undertaken, what the findings were, and other details that may aid readers and reviewers in interpretation and use of the study. The new CHEERS 2022 statement replaces previous CHEERS reporting guidance. It reflects the need for guidance that can be more easily applied to all types of health economic evaluation, new methods and developments in the field, as well as the increased role of stakeholder involvement including patients and the public. It is also broadly applicable to any form of intervention intended to improve the health of individuals or the population, whether simple or complex, and without regard to context (such as health care, public health, education, social care, etc). This summary article presents the new CHEERS 2022 28-item checklist and recommendations for each item. The CHEERS 2022 statement is primarily intended for researchers reporting economic evaluations for peer reviewed journals as well as the peer reviewers and editors assessing them for publication. However, we anticipate familiarity with reporting requirements will be useful for analysts when planning studies. It may also be useful for health technology assessment bodies seeking guidance on reporting, as there is an increasing emphasis on transparency in decision making.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] A history of the evolution of guidelines for reporting medical research: the long road to the EQUATOR Network
    Altman, Douglas G.
    Simera, Iveta
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE, 2016, 109 (02) : 67 - 77
  • [2] Principles for deliberative processes in health technology assessment
    Bond, Kenneth
    Stiffell, Rebecca
    Ollendorf, Daniel A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2020, 36 (04) : 445 - 452
  • [3] CADTH.ca, 2015, Guidelines for the economic evaluation of health technologies
  • [4] Reproducible research practices, openness and transparency in health economic evaluations: study protocol for a cross-sectional comparative analysis
    Catala-Lopez, Ferran
    Caulley, Lisa
    Ridao, Manuel
    Hutton, Brian
    Husereau, Don
    Drummond, Michael F.
    Alonso-Arroyo, Adolfo
    Pardo-Fernandez, Manuel
    Bernal-Delgado, Enrique
    Meneu, Ricard
    Tabares-Seisdedos, Rafael
    Ramon Repullo, Jose
    Moher, David
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (02):
  • [5] Reporting guidelines of health research studies are frequently used inappropriately
    Caulley, Lisa
    Catala-Lopez, Ferran
    Whelan, Jonathan
    Khoury, Michel
    Ferraro, Jennifer
    Cheng, Wei
    Husereau, Don
    Altman, Douglas G.
    Moher, David
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2020, 122 : 87 - 94
  • [6] A Call for Open-Source Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
    Cohen, Joshua T.
    Neumann, Peter J.
    Wong, John B.
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2017, 167 (06) : 432 - +
  • [7] Distributional Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Comes of Age
    Cookson, Richard
    Griffin, Susan
    Norheim, Ole F.
    Culyer, Anthony J.
    Chalkidou, Kalipso
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2021, 24 (01) : 118 - 120
  • [8] Explicit incorporation of equity considerations into economic evaluation of public health interventions
    Cookson, Richard
    Drummond, Mike
    Weatherly, Helen
    [J]. HEALTH ECONOMICS POLICY AND LAW, 2009, 4 (02) : 231 - 245
  • [9] Constrained Optimization Methods in Health Services Research-An Introduction: Report 1 of the ISPOR Optimization Methods Emerging Good Practices Task Force
    Crown, William
    Buyukkaramikli, Nasuh
    Thokala, Praveen
    Morton, Alec
    Sir, Mustafa Y.
    Marshall, Deborah A.
    Tosh, Jon
    Padula, William V.
    Ijzerman, Maarten J.
    Wong, Peter K.
    Pasupathy, Kalyan S.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2017, 20 (03) : 310 - 319
  • [10] Guidelines for conducting and reporting economic evaluation of fall prevention strategies
    Davis, J. C.
    Robertson, M. C.
    Comans, T.
    Scuffham, P. A.
    [J]. OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 22 (09) : 2449 - 2459