Good implant survival after acetabular revision with extensive impaction bone grafting and uncemented components

被引:15
|
作者
Perlbach, R. [1 ,2 ]
Palm, L. [1 ,2 ]
Mohaddes, M. [1 ,2 ,5 ,6 ]
Ivarsson, I. [1 ,2 ]
Schilcher, J. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Linkoping Univ, Dept Orthopaed, Linkoping, Sweden
[2] Linkoping Univ, Dept Clin & Expt Med, Linkoping, Sweden
[3] Linkoping Univ, Univ Hosp Linkoping, Dept Orthoped Surg, Linkoping, Sweden
[4] Linkoping Univ, Univ Hosp Linkoping, Dept Clin & Expt Med, Linkoping, Sweden
[5] Sahlgrens Acad, Inst Clin Sci, Dept Orthoped, Gothenburg, Sweden
[6] Registerctr VGR, Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register, Gothenburg, Sweden
关键词
HIP-ARTHROPLASTY; FOLLOW-UP; ALLOGRAFT; RECONSTRUCTION; MIGRATION; FAILURE; PROSTHESES;
D O I
10.1302/0301-620X.102B2.BJJ-2019-0584.R2
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Aims This single-centre observational study aimed to describe the results of extensive bone impaction grafting of the whole acetabular cavity in combination with an uncemented component in acetabular revisions performed in a standardized manner since 1993. Methods Between 1993 and 2013, 370 patients with a median age of 72 years (interquartile range (IQR) 63 to 79 years) underwent acetabular revision surgery. Of these, 229 were more than ten years following surgery and 137 were more than 15 years. All revisions were performed with extensive use of morcellized allograft firmly impacted into the entire acetabular cavity, followed by insertion of an uncemented component with supplementary screw fixation. All types of reoperation were captured using review of radiographs and medical charts, combined with data from the local surgical register and the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register. Results Among patients with possible follow-up of ten and 15 years, 152 and 72 patients remained alive without revision of the acetabular component. The number of deaths was 61 and 50, respectively. Of those who died, six patients in each group had a reoperation performed before death. The number of patients with a reoperation was 22 for those with ten-year follow-up and 21 for those with 15 years of follow-up. The Kaplan-Meier implant survival rate for aseptic loosening among all 370 patients in the cohort was 96.3% (95% confidence interval (CI) 94.1 to 98.5) after ten years and 92.8% (95% CI 89.2 to 96.6) after 15 years. Conclusion Extensive bone impaction grafting combined with uncemented revision components appears to be a reliable method with favourable long-term survival. This technique offers the advantage of bone stock restoration and disputes the long-standing perception that uncemented components require > 50% of host bone contact for successful implant survival.
引用
收藏
页码:198 / 204
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Treatment of severe bone deficiency in acetabular revision surgery using a reinforcement device and bone grafting
    Zhai Ji-liang
    Lin Jin
    Jin Jin
    Qian Wen-wei
    Weng Xi-sheng
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2011, 124 (09) : 1381 - 1385
  • [42] Favorable Early Results of Impaction Bone Grafting With Reinforcement Mesh for the Treatment of Paprosky 3B Acetabular Defects
    Waddell, Bradford S.
    Boettner, Friedrich
    Della Valle, Alejandro Gonzalez
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2017, 32 (03) : 919 - 923
  • [43] A novel technique for impaction bone grafting in acetabular reconstruction of revision total hip arthroplasty using an ex vivo compaction device
    Akiyama, Haruhiko
    Morishima, Takkan
    Takemoto, Mitsuru
    Yamamoto, Koji
    Otsuka, Hiromi
    Iwase, Toshiki
    Kabata, Tamon
    Soeda, Tsunemitsu
    Kawanabe, Keiichi
    Sato, Keiji
    Nakamura, Takashi
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SCIENCE, 2011, 16 (01) : 26 - 37
  • [44] Early results of whole femoral head allograft with articular cartilage for acetabular impaction grafting in revision hip replacements
    Subramanian, Sivaraman
    Jain, Kaushik D.
    Sreekumar, Ramakutty
    Fox, Una
    Hemmady, Mukesh
    Hodgkinson, John
    ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND, 2010, 92 (01) : 27 - 30
  • [45] Impaction bone grafting for femoral revision hip arthroplasty with Exeter Universal stem in Japan
    Iwase, Toshiki
    Otsuka, Hiromi
    Katayama, Naoyuki
    Fujita, Hiroshi
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2012, 132 (10) : 1487 - 1494
  • [46] Midterm survival analysis of a cemented dual-mobility cup combined with bone impaction grafting in 102 revision hip arthroplasties
    Spaans, Elsa A.
    Koenraadt, Koen L. M.
    Wagenmakers, Robert
    van den Hout, Joost A. A. M.
    te Stroet, Martijn A. J.
    Bolder, Stefan B. T.
    HIP INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 28 (02) : 161 - 167
  • [47] Impaction bone grafting in revision hip surgery: past, present and future
    McNamara, Iain R.
    CELL AND TISSUE BANKING, 2010, 11 (01) : 57 - 73
  • [48] What Are the Long-term Results of Cemented Revision THA with Use of Both Acetabular and Femoral Impaction Bone Grafting in Patients Younger Than 55 Years?
    Verspeek, Jason
    Nijenhuis, Thijs A.
    Kuijpers, Martijn F. L.
    Rijnen, Wim H. C.
    Schreurs, B. Willem
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2021, 479 (01) : 84 - 91
  • [49] Impaction Bone Grafting Combined with Titanium Mesh for Acetabular Bone Defects Reconstruction in Total Hip Arthroplasty Revision: A Retrospective and Mini-Review Study
    Li, Xiang
    Pan, Bai-qi
    Wu, Xiao-yu
    Fu, Ming
    Liao, Wei-ming
    Wu, Chu-heng
    Sheng, Pu-yi
    ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2022, 14 (05) : 902 - 910
  • [50] Femoral impaction bone grafting in revision hip arthroplasty 705 CASES FROM THE ORIGINATING CENTRE
    Wilson, M. J.
    Hook, S.
    Whitehouse, S. L.
    Timperley, A. J.
    Gie, G. A.
    BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2016, 98B (12) : 1611 - 1619