Good implant survival after acetabular revision with extensive impaction bone grafting and uncemented components

被引:15
|
作者
Perlbach, R. [1 ,2 ]
Palm, L. [1 ,2 ]
Mohaddes, M. [1 ,2 ,5 ,6 ]
Ivarsson, I. [1 ,2 ]
Schilcher, J. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Linkoping Univ, Dept Orthopaed, Linkoping, Sweden
[2] Linkoping Univ, Dept Clin & Expt Med, Linkoping, Sweden
[3] Linkoping Univ, Univ Hosp Linkoping, Dept Orthoped Surg, Linkoping, Sweden
[4] Linkoping Univ, Univ Hosp Linkoping, Dept Clin & Expt Med, Linkoping, Sweden
[5] Sahlgrens Acad, Inst Clin Sci, Dept Orthoped, Gothenburg, Sweden
[6] Registerctr VGR, Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register, Gothenburg, Sweden
关键词
HIP-ARTHROPLASTY; FOLLOW-UP; ALLOGRAFT; RECONSTRUCTION; MIGRATION; FAILURE; PROSTHESES;
D O I
10.1302/0301-620X.102B2.BJJ-2019-0584.R2
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Aims This single-centre observational study aimed to describe the results of extensive bone impaction grafting of the whole acetabular cavity in combination with an uncemented component in acetabular revisions performed in a standardized manner since 1993. Methods Between 1993 and 2013, 370 patients with a median age of 72 years (interquartile range (IQR) 63 to 79 years) underwent acetabular revision surgery. Of these, 229 were more than ten years following surgery and 137 were more than 15 years. All revisions were performed with extensive use of morcellized allograft firmly impacted into the entire acetabular cavity, followed by insertion of an uncemented component with supplementary screw fixation. All types of reoperation were captured using review of radiographs and medical charts, combined with data from the local surgical register and the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register. Results Among patients with possible follow-up of ten and 15 years, 152 and 72 patients remained alive without revision of the acetabular component. The number of deaths was 61 and 50, respectively. Of those who died, six patients in each group had a reoperation performed before death. The number of patients with a reoperation was 22 for those with ten-year follow-up and 21 for those with 15 years of follow-up. The Kaplan-Meier implant survival rate for aseptic loosening among all 370 patients in the cohort was 96.3% (95% confidence interval (CI) 94.1 to 98.5) after ten years and 92.8% (95% CI 89.2 to 96.6) after 15 years. Conclusion Extensive bone impaction grafting combined with uncemented revision components appears to be a reliable method with favourable long-term survival. This technique offers the advantage of bone stock restoration and disputes the long-standing perception that uncemented components require > 50% of host bone contact for successful implant survival.
引用
收藏
页码:198 / 204
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Selection of allografts for impaction bone grafting for bone defect reconstruction on the acetabular side
    Xu Zheng-jian
    He Rong-xin
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2010, 123 (21) : 3143 - 3147
  • [32] Mid- to Long-term Follow-up of Severe Acetabular Bone Defect after Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Impaction Bone Grafting and Metal Mesh
    Yang, Chao
    Zhu, Kechao
    Dai, Huiyong
    Zhang, Xianlong
    Wang, Qiaojie
    Wang, Qi
    ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2023, 15 (03) : 750 - 757
  • [33] High proximal migration in cemented acetabular revisions operated with bone impaction grafting; 47 revision cups followed with RSA for 17 years
    Mohaddes, Maziar
    Herberts, Peter
    Malchau, Henrik
    Johanson, Per-Erik
    Karrholm, Johan
    HIP INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 27 (03) : 251 - 258
  • [34] The Sit-to-Stand Movement: Differences in Performance Between Patients After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty With Acetabular Bone Impaction Grafting
    Boonstra, Miranda C.
    Schreurs, B. Wim
    Verdonschot, Nico
    PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2011, 91 (04): : 547 - 554
  • [35] The use of hardened bone cement as an impaction grafting extender for revision hip arthroplasty
    Ruddy, Mark
    FitzPatrick, David P.
    Stanton, Kenneth T.
    JOURNAL OF THE MECHANICAL BEHAVIOR OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS, 2018, 78 : 82 - 90
  • [36] Both Acetabular and Femoral Reconstructions With Impaction Bone Grafting in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: Case Series and Literature Review
    Xiong, Liang
    Li, Hui
    Huang, Xianzhe
    Jie, Shuo
    Zhu, Weihong
    Pan, Jiankang
    Wu, Xiaoxin
    Mao, Xinzhan
    ARTHROPLASTY TODAY, 2023, 24
  • [37] Bone mineral density changes in the graft after acetabular impaction bone grafting in primary and revision hip surgery A 2-year prospective follow-up
    Gerhardt, Davey M. J. M.
    De Visser, Enrico
    Hendrickx, Baudewijn W.
    Schreurs, Berend W.
    Van Susante, Job L. C.
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA, 2018, 89 (03) : 302 - 307
  • [38] Impaction bone grafting for acetabular reconstruction: mean 5.5-year results in Japanese patients
    Iwase, Toshiki
    Masui, Tetsuo
    Torii, Yukio
    Kouyama, Atsushi
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2010, 130 (04) : 433 - 439
  • [39] Impaction bone grafting for acetabular reconstruction: mean 5.5-year results in Japanese patients
    Toshiki Iwase
    Tetsuo Masui
    Yukio Torii
    Atsushi Kouyama
    Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2010, 130 : 433 - 439
  • [40] Implant Survival of an Uncemented Modular Femoral Implant in Patients With Severe Femoral Bone Loss and 2-Stage Hip Revision
    Winther, Sebastian
    Elsayed, Naima
    Dyreborg, Karen
    Mortensen, Elinborg
    M. Petersen, Michael.
    Stuerup, Jens
    Winther, Nikolaj S.
    ADVANCES IN ORTHOPEDICS, 2024, 2024