Good implant survival after acetabular revision with extensive impaction bone grafting and uncemented components

被引:15
|
作者
Perlbach, R. [1 ,2 ]
Palm, L. [1 ,2 ]
Mohaddes, M. [1 ,2 ,5 ,6 ]
Ivarsson, I. [1 ,2 ]
Schilcher, J. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Linkoping Univ, Dept Orthopaed, Linkoping, Sweden
[2] Linkoping Univ, Dept Clin & Expt Med, Linkoping, Sweden
[3] Linkoping Univ, Univ Hosp Linkoping, Dept Orthoped Surg, Linkoping, Sweden
[4] Linkoping Univ, Univ Hosp Linkoping, Dept Clin & Expt Med, Linkoping, Sweden
[5] Sahlgrens Acad, Inst Clin Sci, Dept Orthoped, Gothenburg, Sweden
[6] Registerctr VGR, Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register, Gothenburg, Sweden
关键词
HIP-ARTHROPLASTY; FOLLOW-UP; ALLOGRAFT; RECONSTRUCTION; MIGRATION; FAILURE; PROSTHESES;
D O I
10.1302/0301-620X.102B2.BJJ-2019-0584.R2
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Aims This single-centre observational study aimed to describe the results of extensive bone impaction grafting of the whole acetabular cavity in combination with an uncemented component in acetabular revisions performed in a standardized manner since 1993. Methods Between 1993 and 2013, 370 patients with a median age of 72 years (interquartile range (IQR) 63 to 79 years) underwent acetabular revision surgery. Of these, 229 were more than ten years following surgery and 137 were more than 15 years. All revisions were performed with extensive use of morcellized allograft firmly impacted into the entire acetabular cavity, followed by insertion of an uncemented component with supplementary screw fixation. All types of reoperation were captured using review of radiographs and medical charts, combined with data from the local surgical register and the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register. Results Among patients with possible follow-up of ten and 15 years, 152 and 72 patients remained alive without revision of the acetabular component. The number of deaths was 61 and 50, respectively. Of those who died, six patients in each group had a reoperation performed before death. The number of patients with a reoperation was 22 for those with ten-year follow-up and 21 for those with 15 years of follow-up. The Kaplan-Meier implant survival rate for aseptic loosening among all 370 patients in the cohort was 96.3% (95% confidence interval (CI) 94.1 to 98.5) after ten years and 92.8% (95% CI 89.2 to 96.6) after 15 years. Conclusion Extensive bone impaction grafting combined with uncemented revision components appears to be a reliable method with favourable long-term survival. This technique offers the advantage of bone stock restoration and disputes the long-standing perception that uncemented components require > 50% of host bone contact for successful implant survival.
引用
收藏
页码:198 / 204
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Impaction Bone Grafting with Low Dose Irradiated Freeze-Dried Allograft Bone for Acetabular Reconstruction
    Li, Hongxing
    Tan, Kelvin Guoping
    Li, Zhiling
    Wu, Xiaoxin
    Cai, Guangping
    Zhu, Weihong
    Huang, Tianlong
    Wang, Wanchun
    Crawford, Ross
    Mao, Xinzhan
    ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2022, 14 (10) : 2519 - 2526
  • [22] Impaction bone grafting for contained acetabular defects in total hip arthroplasty
    Abu-Zeid, Mohamed Yousry
    Habib, Mohamed El-Sawy
    Marei, Sameh Mohamed
    Elbarbary, Ahmed Nasr-Eldin
    Ebied, Ahmed Ali
    Mesregah, Mohamed Kamal
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2023, 18 (01)
  • [23] Impaction bone grafting for the reconstruction of large bone defects in revision knee arthroplasty
    Rudert, M.
    Holzapfel, B. M.
    von Rottkay, E.
    Holzapfel, D. E.
    Noeth, U.
    OPERATIVE ORTHOPADIE UND TRAUMATOLOGIE, 2015, 27 (01): : 35 - 46
  • [24] Results using Trabecular Metal™ augments in combination with acetabular impaction bone grafting in deficient acetabula
    Gill, Kathryn
    Wilson, Matthew J.
    Whitehouse, Sarah L.
    Timperley, A. John
    HIP INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 23 (06) : 522 - 528
  • [25] Impaction bone grafting for segmental acetabular defects: a biomechanical study
    Wagener Nele
    Fritsch Martina
    Reinicke Stefan
    Layher Frank
    Matziolis Georg
    Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2023, 143 : 1353 - 1359
  • [26] Acetabular Revision With Extensive Allograft Impaction and Uncemented Hydroxyapatite-Coated Implants. Results After 9 (7-11) Years Follow-Up
    Palm, Lars
    Jacobsson, Sven-Arne
    Kvist, Joanna
    Lindholm, Anna
    Ojersjo, Andreas
    Ivarsson, Ingemar
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2007, 22 (08) : 1083 - 1091
  • [27] Femoral revision with impaction bone grafting and a cemented polished tapered stem
    Heyligers, I. C.
    Schreurs, B. W.
    van Haaren, E. H.
    OPERATIVE ORTHOPADIE UND TRAUMATOLOGIE, 2014, 26 (02): : 156 - 161
  • [28] Impaction bone grafting for the reconstruction of large bone defects in revision knee arthroplasty; [Impaction-Bone-Grafting zur Rekonstruktion ausgedehnter Knochendefekte beim Knieprothesenwechsel]
    Rudert M.
    Holzapfel B.M.
    von Rottkay E.
    Holzapfel D.E.
    Noeth U.
    Operative Orthopädie und Traumatologie, 2015, 27 (1) : 35 - 46
  • [29] Processed versus fresh frozen bone for impaction bone grafting in revision hip arthroplasty
    Board, Timothy N.
    Brunskill, Susan
    Doree, Carolyn
    Hyde, Chris
    Kay, Peter R.
    Meek, R. M. Dominic
    Webster, Robert
    Galea, George
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2009, (04):
  • [30] Bone remodelling around uncemented metallic and ceramic acetabular components
    Ghosh, Rajesh
    Mukherjee, Kaushik
    Gupta, Sanjay
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART H-JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE, 2013, 227 (H5) : 490 - 502