Good implant survival after acetabular revision with extensive impaction bone grafting and uncemented components

被引:15
|
作者
Perlbach, R. [1 ,2 ]
Palm, L. [1 ,2 ]
Mohaddes, M. [1 ,2 ,5 ,6 ]
Ivarsson, I. [1 ,2 ]
Schilcher, J. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Linkoping Univ, Dept Orthopaed, Linkoping, Sweden
[2] Linkoping Univ, Dept Clin & Expt Med, Linkoping, Sweden
[3] Linkoping Univ, Univ Hosp Linkoping, Dept Orthoped Surg, Linkoping, Sweden
[4] Linkoping Univ, Univ Hosp Linkoping, Dept Clin & Expt Med, Linkoping, Sweden
[5] Sahlgrens Acad, Inst Clin Sci, Dept Orthoped, Gothenburg, Sweden
[6] Registerctr VGR, Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register, Gothenburg, Sweden
关键词
HIP-ARTHROPLASTY; FOLLOW-UP; ALLOGRAFT; RECONSTRUCTION; MIGRATION; FAILURE; PROSTHESES;
D O I
10.1302/0301-620X.102B2.BJJ-2019-0584.R2
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Aims This single-centre observational study aimed to describe the results of extensive bone impaction grafting of the whole acetabular cavity in combination with an uncemented component in acetabular revisions performed in a standardized manner since 1993. Methods Between 1993 and 2013, 370 patients with a median age of 72 years (interquartile range (IQR) 63 to 79 years) underwent acetabular revision surgery. Of these, 229 were more than ten years following surgery and 137 were more than 15 years. All revisions were performed with extensive use of morcellized allograft firmly impacted into the entire acetabular cavity, followed by insertion of an uncemented component with supplementary screw fixation. All types of reoperation were captured using review of radiographs and medical charts, combined with data from the local surgical register and the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register. Results Among patients with possible follow-up of ten and 15 years, 152 and 72 patients remained alive without revision of the acetabular component. The number of deaths was 61 and 50, respectively. Of those who died, six patients in each group had a reoperation performed before death. The number of patients with a reoperation was 22 for those with ten-year follow-up and 21 for those with 15 years of follow-up. The Kaplan-Meier implant survival rate for aseptic loosening among all 370 patients in the cohort was 96.3% (95% confidence interval (CI) 94.1 to 98.5) after ten years and 92.8% (95% CI 89.2 to 96.6) after 15 years. Conclusion Extensive bone impaction grafting combined with uncemented revision components appears to be a reliable method with favourable long-term survival. This technique offers the advantage of bone stock restoration and disputes the long-standing perception that uncemented components require > 50% of host bone contact for successful implant survival.
引用
收藏
页码:198 / 204
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] The biological approach in acetabular revision surgery: impaction bone grafting and a cemented cup
    Colo, Ena
    Rijnen, Wim H. C.
    Schreurs, Berend Willem
    HIP INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 25 (04) : 361 - 367
  • [12] Cancellous Impaction Bone Grafting of Acetabular Defects in Complex Primary and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Patil, Nilesh
    Hwang, Katherine
    Goodman, Stuart B.
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2012, 35 (03) : E306 - E312
  • [13] Acetabular reconstruction with impaction bone grafting and cemented polyethylene socket in total hip revision arthroplasty
    Kostensalo, I.
    Seppanen, M.
    Virolainen, P.
    Mokka, J.
    Koivisto, M.
    Makela, K. T.
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2015, 104 (04) : 267 - 272
  • [14] Acetabular impaction bone grafting in total hip replacement
    Ibrahim, M. S.
    Raja, S.
    Haddad, F. S.
    BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2013, 95B (11) : 98 - 102
  • [15] A cemented cup with acetabular impaction bone grafting is more cost-effective than an uncemented cup in patients under 50 years
    Busch, Vincent J. J. F.
    Verschueren, Joost
    Adang, Eddy M.
    Lie, Stein A.
    Havelin, Leif I.
    Schreurs, Berend W.
    HIP INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 26 (01) : 43 - 49
  • [16] Impaction Bone Grafting for Acetabular Bone Defects Replacement in Revision Hip Arthroplasty: Biomechanical Aspects
    Golnik, Vadim N.
    Fedorova, Natalia V.
    Larichkin, Alexey Yu.
    Boyko, Svetlana V.
    Panchenko, Andrey A.
    Kosinov, Alexandr M.
    Peleganchuk, Vladimir A.
    Pavlov, Vitaliy V.
    TRAVMATOLOGIYA I ORTOPEDIYA ROSSII, 2024, 30 (04): : 101 - 113
  • [17] Distal femoral impaction bone grafting in revision for tumor endoprosthesis
    Kito, Munehisa
    Okamoto, Masanori
    Aoki, Kaoru
    Tanaka, Atsushi
    Komatsu, Yukiko
    Suzuki, Shuichiro
    Takazawa, Akira
    Yoshimura, Yasuo
    Takahashi, Jun
    KNEE, 2021, 29 : 42 - 48
  • [18] Impaction bone grafting for segmental acetabular defects: a biomechanical study
    Nele, Wagener
    Martina, Fritsch
    Stefan, Reinicke
    Frank, Layher
    Georg, Matziolis
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2023, 143 (03) : 1353 - 1359
  • [19] Early results of revision dual mobility uncemented cups with impaction autologous and synthetic bone graft composite in revision hip arthroplasty for cavitary acetabular defects: A retrospective case series
    Abdelazim, Haytham
    Elerian, Sherif
    Abdelrahman, Amr Ahmed
    Mahmoud, Ahmed Nageeb
    CURRENT ORTHOPAEDIC PRACTICE, 2020, 31 (01): : 48 - 53
  • [20] Acetabular re-revision with impaction bone grafting and a cemented polyethylene cup; a biological option for successive reconstructions
    Schreurs, B. Willem
    te Stroet, Martijn A. J.
    Rijnen, Wim H. C.
    Gardeniers, Jean W. M.
    HIP INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 25 (01) : 44 - 49