Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and spondylolisthesis

被引:11
作者
Tsahtsarlis, Antonio [1 ]
Wood, Martin [1 ]
机构
[1] Mater Private Hosp, Mater Neurosci Ctr, Brisbane Clin Neurosci Ctr, Mater Private Clin, Brisbane, Qld 4101, Australia
关键词
Minimally invasive; Spondylolisthesis; Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions; FOLLOW-UP; MINIMUM;
D O I
10.1016/j.jocn.2011.10.007
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical and radiological outcomes of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF) surgery for lumbar spondylolisthesis. A prospective analysis was conducted of 23 consecutive patients with grade I or grade II lumbar spondylolisthesis who underwent a MI-TLIF using image guidance between August 2008 and September 2010. The patient group comprised 13 males and 10 females (mean age 57 years), 22 of whom underwent single level fusion and one patient with a two level fusion. All patients underwent postoperative CT scans to assess pedicle screw and cage placement and fusion at six months. The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores were recorded preoperatively and at the six-month follow-up. We found that 22 of 23 (95.7%) patients showed evidence of fusion at six months with a mean improvement of 26.7 on ODI scores. The mean length of hospital stay was four days. The mean operative time was 172 minutes. Anatomical reduction of the spondylolisthesis was complete in 16 patients and incomplete in seven. Regarding complications, we observed: one of 94 (1.1%) pedicle screws misplaced, which did not require revision postoperatively: one of 23 patients (4.3%) with a pulmonary embolism and one of 23 (4.3%) patients with transient nerve root pain. There were no occurrences of infection and no postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leaks. We conclude that MI-TLIF offers patients a safe and effective surgical option for lumbar spondylolisthesis treatment. Furthermore, it may offer patients additional advantages in terms of postoperative pain and recovery. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:858 / 861
页数:4
相关论文
共 23 条
[2]   Clinical and radiographic comparison of mini-open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in 42 patients with long-term follow-up [J].
Dhall, Sanjay S. ;
Wang, Michael Y. ;
Mummaneni, Praveen V. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2008, 9 (06) :560-565
[3]   Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Diseases [J].
Fan Shunwu ;
Zhao Xing ;
Zhao Fengdong ;
Fang Xiangqian .
SPINE, 2010, 35 (17) :1615-1620
[4]  
Foley Kevin T, 2002, Clin Neurosurg, V49, P499
[5]   Minimally invasive lumbar fusion [J].
Foley, KT ;
Holly, LT ;
Schwender, JD .
SPINE, 2003, 28 (15) :S26-S35
[6]   A ONE-STAGER PROCEDURE IN OPERATIVE TREATMENT OF SPONDYLOLISTHESES - DORSAL TRACTION-REPOSITION AND ANTERIOR FUSION [J].
HARMS, J ;
ROLINGER, H .
ZEITSCHRIFT FUR ORTHOPADIE UND IHRE GRENZGEBIETE, 1982, 120 (03) :343-347
[7]  
Harms J., 1998, Orthop Traumatol, V6, P88
[8]  
Heary RF, 2002, NEUROSURG FOCUS, V13, P1
[9]  
Humphreys SC, 2001, SPINE, V26, P567
[10]   Minimally invasive microendoscopy-assisted transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with instrumentation [J].
Isaacs, RE ;
Podichetty, VK ;
Santiago, P ;
Sandhu, FA ;
Spears, J ;
Kelly, K ;
Rice, L ;
Fessler, RG .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2005, 3 (02) :98-105