Mechanical obstruction of the olfactory cleft reveals differences between orthonasal and retronasal olfactory functions

被引:43
作者
Pfaar, O
Landis, BN
Frasnelli, J
Hüttenbrink, KB
Hummel, T
机构
[1] Univ Dresden, Sch Med, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, Smell & Taste Clin, D-01307 Dresden, Germany
[2] Univ Mannheim, Ctr Rhinol & Allergol, Wiesbaden, Germany
[3] Univ Hosp Geneva, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, Rhinol Olfact Unit, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland
[4] Univ Hosp Cologne, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, Cologne, Germany
关键词
hyposmia model; interaction; olfaction; retronasal; Sniffin' Sticks; sponge;
D O I
10.1093/chemse/bjj002
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Following up on recent observations in patients with nasal polyposis (NP), the present study aimed to investigate whether a mechanical obstruction of the anterior olfactory cleft (OC) would produce differential effects on orthonasal and retronasal olfactory functions. To this end, we studied 33 healthy subjects in a randomized trial. Sponges with high content of saline were either placed in the OC or on the respiratory epithelium, such that this was blinded to both subject and observer. The results indicated that orthonasal (P = 0.04) but not retronasal (P = 0.15) olfactory identification ability was lower when the OC was blocked. This confirms the idea that differences between orthonasal and retronasal olfactory functions, as observed in NP patients, are, at least to some degree, due to mechanical obstruction of the anterior portion of the OC. The present data also suggest that mechanical obstruction is a means to induce reversible hyposmia void of side effects which can be performed in a blinded fashion. This might become a valuable model of hyposmia for future investigations.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 31
页数:5
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] Sniffing neuropeptides: a transnasal approach to the human brain
    Born, J
    Lange, T
    Kern, W
    McGregor, GP
    Bickel, U
    Fehm, HL
    [J]. NATURE NEUROSCIENCE, 2002, 5 (06) : 514 - 516
  • [2] INTERACTION BETWEEN CHEMO-RECEPTIVE MODALITIES OF ODOR AND IRRITATION
    CAIN, WS
    MURPHY, CL
    [J]. NATURE, 1980, 284 (5753) : 255 - 257
  • [3] CONTRIBUTION OF TRIGEMINAL NERVE TO PERCEIVED ODOR MAGNITUDE
    CAIN, WS
    [J]. ANNALS OF THE NEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES, 1974, 237 (SEP27) : 28 - 34
  • [4] Effects of drugs on olfaction and taste
    Doty, RL
    Bromley, SM
    [J]. OTOLARYNGOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2004, 37 (06) : 1229 - +
  • [5] Decreased trigeminal sensitivity in anosmia
    Gudziol, H
    Schubert, M
    Hummel, T
    [J]. ORL-JOURNAL FOR OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY AND ITS RELATED SPECIALTIES, 2001, 63 (02): : 72 - 75
  • [6] Clinical assessment of retronasal olfactory function
    Heilmann, S
    Strehle, G
    Rosenheim, K
    Damm, M
    Hummel, T
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2002, 128 (04) : 414 - 418
  • [7] Loss of olfactory function leads to a decrease of trigeminal sensitivity
    Hummel, T
    Barz, S
    Lotsch, J
    Roscher, S
    Kettenmann, B
    [J]. CHEMICAL SENSES, 1996, 21 (01) : 75 - 79
  • [8] HUMMEL T, 2003, 2003 M GERM WORK GRO
  • [9] CEREBRAL CHEMOSENSORY EVOKED-POTENTIALS ELICITED BY CHEMICAL-STIMULATION OF THE HUMAN OLFACTORY AND RESPIRATORY NASAL-MUCOSA
    KOBAL, G
    HUMMEL, C
    [J]. ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1988, 71 (04): : 241 - 250
  • [10] Multicenter investigation of 1,036 subjects using a standardized method for the assessment of olfactory function combining tests of odor identification, odor discrimination, and olfactory thresholds
    Kobal, G
    Klimek, L
    Wolfensberger, M
    Gudziol, H
    Temmel, A
    Owen, CM
    Seeber, H
    Pauli, E
    Hummel, T
    [J]. EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2000, 257 (04) : 205 - 211