Predictors and Clinical Outcomes of Crossover From Radial to Femoral Access During Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

被引:4
作者
Sahinkus, Salih [1 ]
Aksoy, Muhammet Necati Murat [1 ]
Aydin, Ercan [2 ]
机构
[1] Sakarya Univ Educ & Res Hosp, Cardiol Dept, Adnan Menderes Rd,Saglik St, TR-54100 Sakarya, Turkey
[2] Vakfikebir State Hosp, Cardiol Dept, Trabzon, Turkey
关键词
angiography; primary coronary intervention; myocardial infarction; femoral access; radial access; ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; ST-SEGMENT ELEVATION; ARTERY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1177/0003319720940128
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Access site complications are more common with femoral access (FA) than radial access (RA). However, due to the higher rate of failure and crossover, door-to-balloon time (DBT) is prolonged by RA. Records of 3600 patients who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) between January 2016 and June 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 130 patients with crossover from RA to FA were identified and compared with the data of 501 patients who underwent pPCI with successful RA during 2018. Regression analysis was performed to determine the predictors of crossover. Crossover to the femoral approach occurred in 5.9% of our cases. Mean DBT was 17 minutes longer in the crossover group (61 +/- 72 minutes vs 78 +/- 79 minutes,P= .026). Female sex (odds ratio [OR]: 1.8; 95% CI, 0.99-3.46,P= .046) and anterior myocardial infarction (AntMI; OR: 0.52; 95% CI, 0.33-0.88,P= .007) were independent predictors of crossover. In-hospital mortality rates were significantly higher in the crossover group than in the radial success group (5.4% vs 1.8%,P= .020). Crossover to FA due to radial failure is associated with delayed DBT and increased rate of in-hospital mortality. Female sex and AntMI were primary predictors of crossover.
引用
收藏
页码:847 / 852
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Relation of Operator Volume and Access Site to Short-Term Mortality in Radial Versus Femoral Access for Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    Hannan, Edward L.
    Zhong, Ye
    Ling, Frederick S. K.
    LeMay, Michel
    Jacobs, Alice K.
    King, Spencer B., III
    Berger, Peter B.
    Venditti, Ferdinand J.
    Walford, Gary
    Tamis-Holland, Jacqueline
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2022, 176 : 30 - 36
  • [42] Radial Access for Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
    Applegate, Robert J.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2014, 63 (10) : 973 - 975
  • [43] Clinical and Radiographic Predictors of Successful Coronary Angiography Through Right Radial Artery Access
    Elfar, Sohil
    Onsy, Ahmed
    Farouk, Mohamed Amr
    INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY-REVIEWS RESEARCH RESOURCES, 2023, 18
  • [44] Comparison of Radial Access, Guided Femoral Access, and Non-Guided Femoral Access Among Women Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    Koshy, Linda M.
    Aberle, Laura H.
    Krucoff, Mitchell W.
    Hess, Connie N.
    Mazzaferri, Ernest, Jr.
    Jolly, Sanjit S.
    Jacobs, Alice
    Gibson, C. Michael
    Mehran, Roxana
    Gilchrist, Ian C.
    Rao, Sunil V.
    JOURNAL OF INVASIVE CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 30 (01) : 18 - 22
  • [45] Distal embolus protection during primary percutaneous coronary intervention: Lessons learned from the clinical trials
    Celik, Turgay
    Iyisoy, Atila
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2009, 133 (02) : 260 - 262
  • [46] Arterial access site and outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with and without vorapaxar
    Dery, Jean-Pierre
    Mahaffey, Kenneth W.
    Tricoci, Pierluigi
    White, Harvey D.
    Podder, Mohua
    Westerhout, Cynthia M.
    Moliterno, David J.
    Harrington, Robert A.
    Chen, Edmond
    Strony, John
    Van de Werf, Frans
    Ziada, Khaled M.
    Held, Claes
    Aylward, Philip E.
    Armstrong, Paul W.
    Rao, Sunil V.
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2016, 88 (02) : 163 - 173
  • [47] Diabetes Mellitus and Glucose as Predictors of Mortality in Primary Coronary Percutaneous Intervention
    David, Renato Budzyn
    Almeida, Eduardo Dytz
    Cruz, Larissa Vargas
    Sebben, Juliana Canedo
    Feijo, Ivan Petry
    Schwarzer Schmidt, Karine Elisa
    Avena, Luisa Martins
    Mascia Gottschall, Carlos Antonio
    de Quadros, Alexandre Schaan
    ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS DE CARDIOLOGIA, 2014, 103 (04) : 323 - 328
  • [48] If the radial artery is the new standard of care in primary percutaneous coronary intervention, why is most intervention done by the femoral approach?
    Patterson, Tiffany
    Foale, Rodney A.
    HEART, 2011, 97 (07) : 521 - 522
  • [49] Acceptance and safety of femoral versus radial access for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI): results from a large monitor-controlled German registry (QuIK)
    Reifart, Joerg
    Goehring, Stefan
    Albrecht, Alexander
    Haerer, Winfried
    Levenson, Benny
    Ringwald, Gerd
    Gaertner, Patrick
    Reifart, Nicolaus
    BMC CARDIOVASCULAR DISORDERS, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [50] Reperfusion Times for Radial Versus Femoral Access in Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Observations From the Cardiac Care Network Provincial Primary PCI Registry
    Cantor, Warren J.
    Ko, Dennis T.
    Natarajan, Madhu K.
    Dzavik, Vladimir
    Wijeysundera, Harindra C.
    Wang, Julie T.
    Kingsbury, Kori J.
    Velianou, James L.
    Cohen, Eric A.
    Le May, Michel R.
    Tu, Jack V.
    CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2015, 8 (05)