Predictors and Clinical Outcomes of Crossover From Radial to Femoral Access During Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

被引:4
作者
Sahinkus, Salih [1 ]
Aksoy, Muhammet Necati Murat [1 ]
Aydin, Ercan [2 ]
机构
[1] Sakarya Univ Educ & Res Hosp, Cardiol Dept, Adnan Menderes Rd,Saglik St, TR-54100 Sakarya, Turkey
[2] Vakfikebir State Hosp, Cardiol Dept, Trabzon, Turkey
关键词
angiography; primary coronary intervention; myocardial infarction; femoral access; radial access; ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; ST-SEGMENT ELEVATION; ARTERY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1177/0003319720940128
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Access site complications are more common with femoral access (FA) than radial access (RA). However, due to the higher rate of failure and crossover, door-to-balloon time (DBT) is prolonged by RA. Records of 3600 patients who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) between January 2016 and June 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 130 patients with crossover from RA to FA were identified and compared with the data of 501 patients who underwent pPCI with successful RA during 2018. Regression analysis was performed to determine the predictors of crossover. Crossover to the femoral approach occurred in 5.9% of our cases. Mean DBT was 17 minutes longer in the crossover group (61 +/- 72 minutes vs 78 +/- 79 minutes,P= .026). Female sex (odds ratio [OR]: 1.8; 95% CI, 0.99-3.46,P= .046) and anterior myocardial infarction (AntMI; OR: 0.52; 95% CI, 0.33-0.88,P= .007) were independent predictors of crossover. In-hospital mortality rates were significantly higher in the crossover group than in the radial success group (5.4% vs 1.8%,P= .020). Crossover to FA due to radial failure is associated with delayed DBT and increased rate of in-hospital mortality. Female sex and AntMI were primary predictors of crossover.
引用
收藏
页码:847 / 852
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Influence of Bleeding Risk on Outcomes of Radial and Femoral Access for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: An Analysis From the GLOBAL LEADERS Trial
    Gao, Chao
    Buszman, Piotr
    Buszman, Pawel
    Chichareon, Ply
    Modolo, Rodrigo
    Garg, Scot
    Takahashi, Kuniaki
    Kawashima, Hideyuki
    Wang, Rutao
    Chang, Chun Chin
    Kogame, Norihiro
    Tomaniak, Mariusz
    Ono, Masafumi
    Hara, Hironori
    Slagboom, Ton
    Aminian, Adel
    Naber, Christoph Kurt
    Carrie, Didier
    Hamm, Christian
    Steg, Philippe Gabriel
    Onuma, Yoshinobu
    van Geuns, Robert-Jan
    Serruys, Patrick W.
    Zurakowski, Aleksander
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2021, 37 (01) : 122 - 130
  • [12] Clinical outcomes following radial versus femoral artery access in primary or rescue percutaneous coronary intervention in Scotland: retrospective cohort study of 4534 patients
    Johnman, Cathy
    Pell, Jill P.
    Mackay, Daniel F.
    Behan, Miles
    Slack, Rachel
    Oldroyd, Keith G.
    Berry, Colin
    HEART, 2012, 98 (07) : 552 - 557
  • [13] Improved in-hospital outcome for radial access in a large contemporary cohort of primary percutaneous coronary intervention
    Hasun, Matthias
    Doerler, Jakob
    Alber, Hannes F.
    Bauer, Axel
    Berger, Rudolf
    Christ, Guenter
    Frick, Matthias
    Hoppe, Uta C.
    Huber, Kurt
    Lamm, Gudrun
    Lassnig, Elisabeth
    von Lewinski, Dirk
    Rab, Anna
    Roithinger, Franz X.
    Schuchlenz, Herwig
    Siostrzonek, Peter
    Sipoetz, Johann
    Stefenelli, Thomas
    Steinwender, Clemens
    Edlinger, Michael
    Weidinger, Franz
    CARDIOVASCULAR DIAGNOSIS AND THERAPY, 2021, 11 (03) : 726 - 735
  • [14] Radial Versus Femoral Access for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Implications for Vascular Complications and Bleeding
    Nathan, Sandeep
    Rao, Sunil V.
    CURRENT CARDIOLOGY REPORTS, 2012, 14 (04) : 502 - 509
  • [15] Radial Versus Femoral Access for Coronary Angiography/Intervention in Women With Acute Coronary Syndromes Insights From the RIVAL Trial (Radial Vs femorAL access for coronary intervention)
    Pandie, Shaheen
    Mehta, Shamir R.
    Cantor, Warren J.
    Cheema, Asim N.
    Gao, Peggy
    Madan, Mina
    Niemela, Kari
    Rao, Sunil V.
    Schwalm, Jon David
    Valentin, Vicent
    Velianou, James L.
    Jolly, Sanjit S.
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2015, 8 (04) : 505 - 512
  • [16] Is It Time to Join the Cult? Radial Access and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    Kleiman, Neal S.
    CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2015, 8 (06)
  • [17] Clinical outcomes of femoral closure compared to radial compression devices following percutaneous coronary intervention: the FERARI study
    Fastner, Christian
    Behnes, Michael
    Uensal, Melike
    El-Battrawy, Ibrahim
    Ansari, Uzair
    Mashayekhi, Kambis
    Hoffmann, Ursula
    Lang, Siegfried
    Kuschyk, Juergen
    Borggrefe, Martin
    Akin, Ibrahim
    HEART AND VESSELS, 2017, 32 (05) : 520 - 530
  • [18] Clinical significance and determinants of prompt recruitment collaterals during primary percutaneous coronary intervention
    Sen, Omer
    Allahverdiyev, Samir
    Topuz, Mustafa
    Baykan, Ahmet Oytun
    Oz, Fahrettin
    Koc, Mevlut
    KARDIOLOGIA POLSKA, 2017, 75 (08) : 763 - 769
  • [19] Adoption of Radial Access and Comparison of Outcomes to Femoral Access in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: An Updated Report from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (2007-2012)
    Feldman, Dmitriy N.
    Swaminathan, Rajesh V.
    Kaltenbach, Lisa A.
    Baklanov, Dmitri V.
    Kim, Luke K.
    Wong, S. Chiu
    Minutello, Robert M.
    Messenger, John C.
    Moussa, Issam
    Garratt, Kirk N.
    Piana, Robert N.
    Hillegass, William B.
    Cohen, Mauricio G.
    Gilchrist, Ian C.
    Rao, Sunil V.
    CIRCULATION, 2013, 127 (23) : 2295 - 2306
  • [20] Comparison of radial versus femoral access using hemostatic devices following percutaneous coronary intervention
    Rana, Naresh
    Vijayvergiya, Rajesh
    Kasinadhuni, Ganesh
    Khanal, Suraj
    Panda, Prashant
    INDIAN HEART JOURNAL, 2021, 73 (03) : 382 - 384