Dose exposure in the ITALUNG trial of lung cancer screening with low-dose CT

被引:48
作者
Mascalchi, M. [1 ,2 ]
Mazzoni, L. N. [3 ]
Falchini, M. [1 ]
Belli, G. [4 ]
Picozzi, G. [5 ]
Merlini, V. [1 ]
Vella, A. [6 ]
Diciotti, S. [1 ]
Falaschi, F. [7 ]
Pegna, A. Lopes [8 ]
Paci, E. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florence, Dept Clin Physiopathol, Radiodiagnost Sect, I-50134 Florence, Italy
[2] Inst Canc Study & Prevent, Florence, Italy
[3] Univ Florence, CIRM, I-50134 Florence, Italy
[4] Careggi Hosp, Dept Med Phys, Florence, Italy
[5] Pistoia Hosp, Dept Radiol, Pistoia, Italy
[6] Le Scotte Univ Hosp, Dept Nucl Med, Siena, Italy
[7] Univ Hosp Pisa, Dept Radiol, Pisa, Italy
[8] Careggi Hosp, Dept Pneumol, Florence, Italy
关键词
RISK-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.1259/bjr/20711289
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Few data are available on the effective dose received by participants in lung cancer screening programmes with low-dose CT (LDCT). We report the collective effective dose delivered to 1406 current or former smokers enrolled in the ITALUNG trial who completed 4 annual LDCT examinations and related further investigations including follow-up LDCT, 2-[F-18]flu-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) or CT-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB). Using the air CT dose index and Monte Carlo simulations on an anthropomorphic phantom, the whole-body effective dose associated with LDCT was determined for the eight CT scanners used in the trial. A value of 7 mSv was assigned to FDG-PET while the measured mean effective dose of CT-guided FNAB was 1.5 mSv. The mean collective effective dose in the 1406 subjects ranged between 8.75 and 9.36 Sv and the mean effective dose to the single subject over 4 years was between 6.2 and 6.8 mSv (range 1.7-21.5 mSv) according to the cranial-caudal length of the LDCT volume. 77.4% of the dose was owing to annual LDCT and 22.6% to further investigations. Considering the nominal risk coefficients for stochastic effects after exposure to low-dose radiation according to the National Radiological Protection Board, International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) 60, ICRP103 and Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation VII, the mean number of radiation-induced cancers ranged between 0.12 and 0.33 per 1000 subjects. The individual effective dose to participants in a 4-year lung cancer screening programme with annual LDCT is very low and about one-third of the effective dose that is associated with natural background radiation and diagnostic radiology in the same time period.
引用
收藏
页码:1134 / 1139
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [11] Radon in homes and risk of lung cancer:: collaborative analysis of individual data from 13 European case-control studies
    Darby, S
    Hill, D
    Auvinen, A
    Barrios-Dios, JM
    Baysson, H
    Bochicchio, F
    Deo, H
    Falk, R
    Forastiere, F
    Hakama, M
    Heid, I
    Kreienbrock, L
    Kreuzer, M
    Lagarde, F
    Mäkeläinen, I
    Muirhead, C
    Oberaigner, W
    Pershagen, G
    Ruano-Ravina, A
    Ruosteenoja, E
    Rosario, AS
    Tirmarche, M
    Tomásek, L
    Whitley, E
    Wichmann, HE
    Doll, R
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2005, 330 (7485): : 223 - 226
  • [12] Low-dose lung computed tomography screening before age 55: estimates of the mortality reduction required to outweigh the radiation-induced cancer risk
    de Gonzalez, Amy Berrington
    Kim, Kwang Pyo
    Berg, Christine D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 2008, 15 (03) : 153 - 158
  • [13] ENEA, 1999, DOSS 1999 RAD IT SAL
  • [14] A Randomized Study of Lung Cancer Screening with Spiral Computed Tomography Three-year Results from the DANTE Trial
    Infante, Maurizio
    Cavuto, Silvio
    Lutman, Fabio Romano
    Brambilla, Giorgio
    Chiesa, Giuseppe
    Ceresoli, Giovanni
    Passera, Eliseo
    Angeli, Enzo
    Chiarenza, Maurizio
    Aranzulla, Giuseppe
    Cariboni, Umberto
    Errico, Valentina
    Inzirillo, Francesco
    Bottoni, Edoardo
    Voulaz, Emanuele
    Alloisio, Marco
    Destro, Anna
    Roncalli, Massimo
    Santoro, Armando
    Ravasi, Gianluigi
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2009, 180 (05) : 445 - 453
  • [15] Managing the small pulmonary nodule discovered by CT
    Libby, DM
    Smith, JP
    Altorki, NK
    Pasmantier, MW
    Yankelevitz, D
    Henschke, CI
    [J]. CHEST, 2004, 125 (04) : 1522 - 1529
  • [16] Effective dose: how should it be applied to medical exposures?
    Martin, C. J.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2007, 80 (956) : 639 - 647
  • [17] 20 years of patient dose studies: where should we go from here?
    Martin, CJ
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2005, 78 (930) : 477 - 479
  • [18] Risk-benefit analysis of X-ray exposure associated with lung cancer screening in the Italung-CT Trial
    Mascalchi, Mario
    Belli, Giacomo
    Zappa, Marco
    Picozzi, Giulia
    Falchini, Massimo
    Della Nave, Riccardo
    Allescia, Germana
    Masi, Andrea
    Pegna, Andrea Lopes
    Villari, Natale
    Paci, Eugenio
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2006, 187 (02) : 421 - 429
  • [19] Estimation of the exposure and a risk-benefit analysis for a CT system designed for a lung cancer mass screening unit
    Nishizawa, K
    Iwai, K
    Matsumoto, T
    Sakashita, K
    Iinuma, TA
    Tateno, Y
    Miyamoto, T
    Shimura, A
    Takagi, H
    [J]. RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 1996, 67 (02) : 101 - 108
  • [20] Lung cancer screening update
    Pegna, Andrea Lopes
    Picozzi, Giulia
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN PULMONARY MEDICINE, 2009, 15 (04) : 327 - 333