The negative predictive value of breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging in noncalcified BIRADS 3 lesions

被引:24
作者
Dorrius, M. D. [1 ]
Pijnappel, R. M. [1 ]
Sijens, P. E. [1 ]
van der Weide, M. C. Jansen [1 ]
Oudkerk, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Radiol, NL-9700 RB Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
Breast cancer; Mammography; MRI; BI-RADS; Probably benign lesions; MR; MAMMOGRAPHY; ACCURACY; WOMEN; AGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.12.046
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to determine whether breast MRI can provide a sufficient NPV to safely rule out malignancy in mammographic BIRADS 3 lesions. Materials and methods: In a 3-year consecutive mammographic examination study 176 out of 4391 patients had a lesion classified as BIRADS 3. 76 out of 176 patients underwent breast MRI as diagnostic work-up. Lesions which MRI classified as BIRADS 1 or 2 were considered negative for malignancy. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV were calculated. Results: In 27 out of 76 (35.5%) patients MRI showed no enhancement and was classified as BIRADS 1. In 25 (32.9%) patients MRI showed focal or mass enhancement classified as BIRADS 2. In these 52 (68.4%) patients no malignancy was found during at least 2 years study follow-up. The other 24 (31.6%) patients had a lesion classified as BIRADS >= 3. Thirteen of these 24 lesions were malignant by pathology. MRI had a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI: 75-100%), specificity of 82.5% (95% CI: 71-91%), PPV of 54.2% (95% CI: 33-74%) and NPV of 100% (95% CI: 93-100%). Conclusion: Breast MRI should be used in a diagnostic strategy for the work-up of noncalcified BIRADS 3 lesions. Malignancy is ruled out with a very high level of confidence in the majority of patients (68%), herewith avoiding invasive diagnostic procedures. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:209 / 213
页数:5
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] Agency for Health Care Research and Quality, 2009, AHRQ PUBL, V2006
  • [2] The clinical value of bilateral breast MR imaging: is it worth performing on patients showing suspicious microcalcifications on mammography?
    Akita, Ayano
    Tanimoto, Akihiro
    Jinno, Hiromitsu
    Kameyama, Kaori
    Kuribayashi, Sachio
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2009, 19 (09) : 2089 - 2096
  • [3] American College of Radiology (ACR), 1998, ILL BREAST IM REP DA
  • [4] Barlow WE, 2002, J NATL CANCER I, V94, P1151
  • [5] Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast prior to biopsy
    Bluemke, DA
    Gatsonis, CA
    Chen, MH
    DeAngelis, GA
    DeBruhl, N
    Harms, S
    Heywang-Köbrunner, SH
    Hylton, N
    Kuhl, CK
    Lehman, C
    Pisano, ED
    Causer, P
    Schnitt, SJ
    Smazal, SF
    Stelling, CB
    Weatherall, PT
    Schnall, MD
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2004, 292 (22): : 2735 - 2742
  • [6] Carney PA, 2003, ANN INTERN MED, V138, P168, DOI 10.7326/0003-4819-138-3-200302040-00008
  • [7] Reader variability in reporting breast imaging according to BI-RADS® assessment categories (the Florence experience)
    Ciatto, S
    Houssami, N
    Apruzzese, A
    Bassetti, E
    Brancato, B
    Carozzia, F
    Catarzi, S
    Lamberini, MP
    Marcelli, G
    Pellizzoni, R
    Pesce, B
    Risso, G
    Russo, F
    Scorsolini, A
    [J]. BREAST, 2006, 15 (01) : 44 - 51
  • [8] Contrast-enhanced MR imaging in patients with BI-RADS 3-5 microcalcifications
    Cilotti A.
    Iacconi C.
    Marini C.
    Moretti M.
    Mazzotta D.
    Traino C.
    Naccarato A.G.
    Piagneri V.
    Giaconi C.
    Bevilacqua G.
    Bartolozzi C.
    [J]. La radiologia medica, 2007, 112 (2) : 272 - 286
  • [9] MR imaging in probably benign lesions (BI-RADS category 3) of the breast
    Gökalp, G
    Topal, U
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2006, 57 (03) : 436 - 444
  • [10] Accuracy of MR imaging in the work-up of suspicious breast lesions: A diagnostic meta-analysis
    Hrung, JM
    Sonnad, SS
    Schwartz, JS
    Langlotz, CP
    [J]. ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 1999, 6 (07) : 387 - 397