Performance and cost-effectiveness of a pooled testing strategy for SARS-CoV-2 using real-time polymerase chain reaction in Uganda

被引:10
|
作者
Bogere, Naghib [1 ]
Bongomin, Felix [2 ,3 ]
Katende, Andrew [4 ]
Ssebambulidde, Kenneth [5 ]
Ssengooba, Willy [6 ]
Ssenfuka, Henry [6 ]
Kigozi, Edgar [6 ]
Biraro, Samuel [7 ]
Kateete, David P. [6 ]
Andia-Biraro, Irene [2 ,8 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Uganda Canc Inst, Kampala, Uganda
[2] Makerere Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, POB 7072, Kampala, Uganda
[3] Gulu Univ, Dept Med Microbiol & Immunol, Fac Med, Gulu, Uganda
[4] Ifakara Hlth Inst, Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania
[5] Makerere Univ, Infect Dis Inst, Kampala, Uganda
[6] Makerere Univ, Sch Biomed Sci, Dept Immunol & Mol Biol, Coll Hlth Sci, Kampala, Uganda
[7] Clockworks Res Co Ltd, Kampala, Uganda
[8] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Uganda Res Unit, Med Res Council, Uganda Virus Res Inst, Entebbe, Uganda
[9] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Uganda Res Unit, Entebbe, Uganda
关键词
COVID-19; Pooled testing; RT-PCR; SARS-CoV-2; LMIC; IMPLEMENTATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijid.2021.10.038
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) remains the gold standard for detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). This study tested the performance of a pooled testing strategy for RT-PCR and its cost-effectiveness. In total, 1280 leftover respiratory samples collected between 19 April and 6 May 2021 were tested in 128 pools of 10 samples each, out of which 16 pools were positive. The positivity rate of the unpooled samples was 1.9% (24/1280). After parallel testing using the individual and pooled testing strategies, positive agreement was 100% and negative agreement was 99.8%. The overall median cycle threshold (Ct) value of the unpooled samples was 29.8 (interquartile range 22.3-34.3). Pools that remained positive when compared with the results of individual samples had lower median Ct values compared with those that turned out to be negative (28.8 versus 34.8; P=0.0.035). Pooled testing reduced the cost >4-fold. Pooled testing may be a more cost-effective approach to diagnose SARS-CoV-2 in resource-limited settings without compromising diagnostic performance. (C) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of International Society for Infectious Diseases.
引用
收藏
页码:355 / 358
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparative Analysis of the Effect of Different Nucleic Acid Extraction Methods on SARS-CoV-2 Quantitative Real-Time Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction Results
    Bozok, Taylan
    Ozturk, Ali
    MIKROBIYOLOJI BULTENI, 2023, 57 (04): : 597 - 607
  • [22] Impact and cost-effectiveness of SARS-CoV-2 self-testing strategies in schools: a multicountry modelling analysis
    Chevalier, Joshua M.
    Han, Alvin X.
    Hansen, Megan A.
    Klock, Ethan
    Pandithakoralage, Hiromi
    Ockhuisen, Tom
    Girdwood, Sarah J.
    Lekodeba, Nkgomeleng A.
    de Nooy, Alexandra
    Khan, Shaukat
    Johnson, Cheryl C.
    Sacks, Jilian A.
    Jenkins, Helen E.
    Russell, Colin A.
    Nichols, Brooke E.
    BMJ OPEN, 2024, 14 (02):
  • [23] Sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 RNA polymerase chain reaction using a clinical and radiological reference standard
    Stockdale, Alexander J.
    Fyles, Fred
    Farrell, Catriona
    Lewis, Joe
    Barr, David
    Haigh, Kathryn
    Abouyannis, Michael
    Hankinson, Beth
    Penha, Diana
    Fernando, Rashika
    Wiles, Rebecca
    Sharma, Sheetal
    Santamaria, Nuria
    Chindambaram, Vijay
    Probert, Cairine
    Ahmed, Muhammad Shamsher
    Cruise, James
    Fordham, Imogen
    Hicks, Rory
    Maxwell, Alice
    Moody, Nick
    Paterson, Tamsin
    Stott, Katharine
    Wu, Meng-San
    Beadsworth, Michael
    Todd, Stacy
    Joekes, Elizabeth
    JOURNAL OF INFECTION, 2021, 82 (06) : 260 - 268
  • [24] Association Between Rapid Antigen Detection Tests and Real-Time Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay for SARS-CoV-2: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses
    Yang, Yu-Pei
    Jiesisibieke, Zhu Liduzi
    Tung, Tao-Hsin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2023, 68
  • [25] Time variation in the probability of failing to detect a case of polymerase chain reaction testing for SARS-CoV-2 as estimated from a viral dynamics model
    Ejima, Keisuke
    Kim, Kwang Su
    Iwanami, Shoya
    Fujita, Yasuhisa
    Li, Ming
    Zoh, Roger S.
    Aihara, Kazuyuki
    Miyazaki, Taiga
    Wakita, Takaji
    Iwami, Shingo
    JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY INTERFACE, 2021, 18 (177)
  • [26] Specificity of SARS-CoV-2 Real-Time PCR Improved by Deep Learning Analysis
    Alouani, David J.
    Rajapaksha, Roshani R. P.
    Jani, Mehul
    Rhoads, Daniel D.
    Sadri, Navid
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2021, 59 (06)
  • [27] Evaluation of Four Commercial Kits for SARS-CoV-2 Real-Time Reverse-Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction Approved by Emergency-Use-Authorization in Korea
    Hur, Kyu-Hwa
    Park, Kuenyoul
    Lim, Youngkuen
    Jeong, Yun Sil
    Sung, Heungsup
    Kim, Mi-Na
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2020, 7
  • [28] Comparative Evaluation of Cartridge-Based Abbott ID NOW Test With Probe-Based Real-Time Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay for Detection of SARS-CoV-2
    Pattnaik, Dipti
    Poddar, Nirmala
    Pathi, Basanti K.
    Panigrahi, Kumudini
    Sabat, Smaranita
    Roy, Ankita
    Patro, A. Raj K.
    Mohapatra, Amrut
    Patro, Shubhransu
    Praharaj, Ashok K.
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 14 (02)
  • [29] Saving Resources: SARS-CoV-2 Diagnostics by Real-Time RT-PCR Using Reduced Reaction Volumes
    Bock, Sabine
    Hoffmann, Bernd
    Beer, Martin
    Wernike, Kerstin
    DISEASES, 2021, 9 (04)
  • [30] Cost-effectiveness of severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) testing and isolation strategies in nursing homes
    Bartsch, Sarah M.
    Weatherwax, Colleen
    Martinez, Marie F.
    Chin, Kevin L.
    Wasserman, Michael R.
    Singh, Raveena D.
    Heneghan, Jessie L.
    Gussin, Gabrielle M.
    Scannell, Sheryl A.
    White, Cameron
    Leff, Bruce
    Huang, Susan S.
    Lee, Bruce Y.
    INFECTION CONTROL & HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2024, 45 (06) : 754 - 761