A dark matter model that reconciles tensions between the cosmic-ray e± excess and the gamma-ray and CMB constraints

被引:18
作者
Xiang, Qian-Fei [1 ,2 ]
Bi, Xiao-Jun [1 ]
Lin, Su-Jie [1 ]
Yin, Peng-Fei [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst High Energy Phys, Key Lab Particle Astrophys, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Sch Phys Sci, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
PROPAGATION; ANISOTROPY;
D O I
10.1016/j.physletb.2017.09.003
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
The cosmic-ray (CR) e(+/-) excess observed by AMS-02 can be explained by dark matter (DM) annihilation. However, the DM explanation requires a large annihilation cross section which is strongly disfavored by other observations, such as the Fermi-LAT gamma-ray observation of dwarf galaxies and the Planck observation of the cosmic microwave background (CMB). Moreover, the DM annihilation cross section required by the CR e(sic) excess is also too large to generate the correct DM relic density with thermal production. In this work we use the Breit-Wigner mechanism with a velocity dependent DM annihilation cross section to reconcile these tensions. If DM particles accounting for the CR e +/- excess with v similar to O(10(-3)) are very close to a resonance in the physical pole case, their annihilation cross section in the Galaxy reaches a maximal value. On the other hand, the annihilation cross section would be suppressed for DM particles with smaller relative velocities in dwarf galaxies and at recombination, which may affect the gamma-ray and CMB observations, respectively. We find a proper parameter region that can simultaneously explain the AMS-02 results and the thermal relic density, while satisfying the Fermi-LAT and Planck constraints. (C) 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:448 / 454
页数:7
相关论文
共 58 条
[11]  
[Anonymous], PHYS REV LETT
[12]  
[Anonymous], AM I PHYS C SERIES
[13]  
[Anonymous], ARXIV170609974
[14]   A theory of dark matter [J].
Arkani-Hamed, Nima ;
Finkbeiner, Douglas P. ;
Slatyer, Tracy R. ;
Weiner, Neal .
PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2009, 79 (01)
[15]   PAMELA and dark matter [J].
Barger, V. ;
Keung, W. -Y. ;
Marfatia, D. ;
Shaughnessy, G. .
PHYSICS LETTERS B, 2009, 672 (02) :141-146
[16]   May heavy neutrinos solve underground and cosmic-ray puzzles? [J].
Belotsky, K. M. ;
Fargion, D. ;
Khlopov, M. Yu. ;
Konoplich, R. V. .
PHYSICS OF ATOMIC NUCLEI, 2008, 71 (01) :147-161
[17]   Fermi-LAT kills dark matter interpretations of AMS-02 data. Or not? [J].
Belotsky, Konstantin ;
Budaev, Ruslan ;
Kirillov, Alexander ;
Leletin, Maxim .
JOURNAL OF COSMOLOGY AND ASTROPARTICLE PHYSICS, 2017, (01)
[18]  
Bergstrom L., 2009, Phys. Rev. Lett, V103, p031,103
[19]   New positron spectral features from supersymmetric dark matter: A way to explain the PAMELA data? [J].
Bergstrom, Lars ;
Bringmann, Torsten ;
Edsjo, Joakim .
PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2008, 78 (10)
[20]   Breit-Wigner enhancement considering the dark matter kinetic decoupling [J].
Bi, Xiao-Jun ;
Yin, Peng-Fei ;
Yuan, Qiang .
PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2012, 85 (04)