共 41 条
A Randomized, Double-blind, Multicenter Trial Comparing Efficacy and Safety of Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam Versus Piperacillin/Tazobactam in Adults With Hospital-acquired or Ventilator-associated Bacterial Pneumonia (RESTORE-IMI 2 Study)
被引:73
作者:
Titov, Ivan
[1
]
Wunderink, Richard G.
[2
]
Roquilly, Antoine
[3
]
Gonzalez, Daniel Rodriguez
[4
]
David-Wang, Aileen
[5
,6
]
Boucher, Helen W.
[7
]
Kaye, Keith S.
[8
]
Losada, Maria C.
[9
]
Du, Jiejun
[9
]
Tipping, Robert
[9
]
Rizk, Matthew L.
[9
]
Patel, Munjal
[9
]
Brown, Michelle L.
[9
]
Young, Katherine
[9
]
Kartsonis, Nicholas A.
[9
]
Butterton, Joan R.
[9
]
Paschke, Amanda
[9
]
Chen, Luke F.
[9
]
机构:
[1] Ivano Frankivsk Reg Clin Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol & Intens Care, Ivano Frankivsk, Ukraine
[2] Northwestern Univ, Dept Med, Feinberg Sch Med, Div Pulm & Crit Care, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[3] Univ Nantes, Inst Rech Sante 2 Nantes Biotech, EA3826 Therapeut Antiinfect, Nantes, France
[4] Hosp Civil Guadalajara, Dept Intens Care, Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico
[5] Univ Philippines, Dept Med, Manila, Philippines
[6] Univ Philippines, Philippine Gen Hosp, Div Pulm Med, Manila, Philippines
[7] Tufts Med Ctr, Div Geog Med & Infect Dis, Boston, MA 02111 USA
[8] Univ Michigan, Sch Med, Dept Internal Med, Div Infect Dis, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[9] Merck & Co Inc, Merck Res Labs, Kenilworth, NJ 07033 USA
关键词:
carbapenem resistant;
KPC;
Pseudomonas;
nosocomial pneumonia;
mechanical ventilation;
IN-VITRO ACTIVITY;
ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE;
RELEBACTAM;
MEROPENEM;
IMIPENEM;
INFECTIONS;
PATHOGENS;
PHASE-2;
D O I:
10.1093/cid/ciaa803
中图分类号:
R392 [医学免疫学];
Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号:
100102 ;
摘要:
Background. Imipenem combined with the beta-lactamase inhibitor relebactam has broad antibacterial activity, including against carbapenem-resistant gram-negative pathogens. We evaluated efficacy and safety of imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam in treating hospital-acquired/ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (HABP/VABP). Methods. This was a randomized, controlled, double-blind phase 3 trial. Adults with HABP/VABP were randomized 1:1 to imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam 500 mg/500 mg/250 mg or piperacillin/tazobactam 4 g/500 mg, intravenously every 6 hours for 7-14 days. The primary endpoint was day 28 all-cause mortality in the modified intent-to-treat (MITT) population (patients who received study therapy, excluding those with only gram-positive cocci at baseline). The key secondary endpoint was clinical response 7-14 days after completing therapy in the MITT population. Results. Of 537 randomized patients (from 113 hospitals in 27 countries), the MITT population comprised 264 imipenem/cilastatin/ relebactam and 267 piperacillin/tazobactam patients; 48.6% had ventilated HABP/VABP, 47.5% APACHE II score >= 15, 24.7% moderate/ severe renal impairment, 42.9% were >= 65 years old, and 66.1% were in the intensive care unit. The most common baseline pathogens were Klebsiella pneumoniae (25.6%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (18.9%). Imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam was noninferior (P <.001) to piperacillin/tazobactam for both endpoints: day 28 all-cause mortality was 15.9% with imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam and 21.3% with piperacillin/tazobactam (difference, -5.3% [95% confidence interval {CI}, -11.9% to 1.2%]), and favorable clinical response at early follow-up was 61.0% and 55.8%, respectively (difference, 5.0% [95% CI, -3.2% to 13.2%]). Serious adverse events (AEs) occurred in 26.7% of imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam and 32.0% of piperacillin/tazobactam patients; AEs leading to treatment discontinuation in 5.6% and 8.2%, respectively; and drug-related AEs (none fatal) in 11.7% and 9.7%, respectively. Conclusions. Imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam is an appropriate treatment option for gram-negative HABP/VABP, including in critically ill, high-risk patients.
引用
收藏
页码:E4539 / E4548
页数:10
相关论文