Cost-utility analysis of 1-year treatment with adalimumab/standard care and standard care alone for ulcerative colitis in Poland

被引:4
|
作者
Stawowczyk, Ewa [1 ]
Kawalec, Pawel [2 ]
Pilc, Andrzej [3 ]
机构
[1] StatSoft Polska Sp Zoo, Krakow, Poland
[2] Jagiellonian Univ, Inst Publ Hlth, Dept Drug Management, Fac Hlth Sci,Med Coll, 20 Grzegorzecka St, PL-31531 Krakow, Poland
[3] Polish Acad Sci, Inst Pharmacol, Dept Neurobiol, Krakow, Poland
关键词
Ulcerative colitis; Cost-utility; Adalimumab; Economic analysis; Indirect costs; GASTROENTEROLOGY; COMPLICATIONS; THERAPY; DISEASE;
D O I
10.1007/s00228-016-2103-4
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Until recently, surgery was the only remaining choice for moderate to severe chronic ulcerative colitis patients who failed standard treatment or when it was not tolerated. Anti-TNF alpha treatment is a new, non-invasive option for the management of ulcerative colitis. The objective of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of induction and maintenance treatment up to 1 year of ulcerative colitis with adalimumab/standard care and standard care alone in Poland. A Markov model was used to estimate the expected costs and effects of adalimumab/standard care and a standard care alone. For each treatment option, the costs and quality adjusted life years were calculated to estimate the incremental cost-utility ratio. The analysis was performed from the perspective of the Polish public payer and society over a 30-year time horizon. Different direct and indirect costs and utility values were assigned to the various model health states. The treatment of ulcerative colitis patients with adalimumab/standard care up to 1 year instead of a standard care alone resulted in 0.14 additional years of life with full health (QALYs). The incremental cost-utility ratio of adalimumab/standard care compared to the standard care alone is estimated to be 76,120 a,not sign/QALY gained from NHF perspective and 71,457 a,not sign/QALY gained from social perspective. The biologic treatment of ulcerative colitis patients with adalimumab/standard care is more effective but also more costly compared with standard care alone.
引用
收藏
页码:1319 / 1325
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Cost-utility analysis of osteopathy in primary care: results from a pragmatic randomized controlled trial
    Williams, NH
    Edwards, RT
    Linck, P
    Muntz, R
    Hibbs, R
    Wilkinson, C
    Russell, I
    Russell, D
    Hounsome, B
    FAMILY PRACTICE, 2004, 21 (06) : 643 - 650
  • [32] Cost-utility analysis of fracture risk assessment using microRNAs compared with standard tools and no monitoring in the Austrian female population
    Walter, Evelyn
    Dellago, Hanna
    Grillari, Johannes
    Dimai, Hans Peter
    Hack, Matthias
    BONE, 2018, 108 : 44 - 54
  • [33] Cost-utility analysis of deferasirox compared to standard therapy with desferrioxamine for patients requiring iron chelation therapy in the United Kingdom
    Karnon, J.
    Tolley, K.
    Oyee, J.
    Jewitt, K.
    Ossa, D.
    Akehurst, R.
    CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2008, 24 (06) : 1609 - 1621
  • [34] Cost-Utility Analysis of Maintenance Pemetrexed Plus Best Supportive Care Compared With Best Supportive Care Alone in Treating Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in Jordan
    Al Rabayah, Abeer
    Al Froukh, Rawan
    Sawalha, Razan
    Al Shnekat, Maali
    Jahn, Beate
    Siebert, Uwe
    Jaddoua, Saad M.
    VALUE IN HEALTH REGIONAL ISSUES, 2024, 43
  • [35] A cost-utility analysis of the impact of electronic nicotine delivery systems on health care costs and outcomes in Canada
    Pound, Catherine M.
    Coyle, Doug
    HEALTH PROMOTION AND CHRONIC DISEASE PREVENTION IN CANADA-RESEARCH POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2022, 42 (01): : 29 - 36
  • [36] Cost-utility analysis of cardiac rehabilitation after conventional heart valve surgery versus usual care
    Hansen, Tina Birgitte
    Zwisler, Ann Dorthe
    Berg, Selina Kikkenborg
    Sibilitz, Kirstine Laerum
    Thygesen, Lau Caspar
    Kjellberg, Jakob
    Doherty, Patrick
    Oldridge, Neil
    Sogaard, Rikke
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 24 (07) : 698 - 707
  • [37] Cost-utility analysis of physician-pharmacist collaborative intervention for treating hypertension compared with usual care
    Kulchaitanaroaj, Puttarin
    Brooks, John M.
    Chaiyakunapruk, Nathorn
    Goedken, Amber M.
    Chrischilles, Elizabeth A.
    Carter, Barry L.
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2017, 35 (01) : 178 - 187
  • [38] Smart connected insulin dose monitoring technologies versus standard of care: a Canadian cost-effectiveness analysis
    Chan, Katalina
    Hansen, Kare
    Muratov, Sergey
    Khoudigian, Shoghag
    Lamotte, Mark
    JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH, 2024, 13 (03)
  • [39] Cost-Effectiveness of Acthar Gel versus Standard of Care for the Treatment of Advanced Symptomatic Sarcoidosis
    Bindra, Jas
    Chopra, Ishveen
    Hayes, Kyle
    Niewoehner, John
    Panaccio, Mary
    Wan, George J.
    CLINICOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2023, 15 : 739 - 752
  • [40] A cost-utility analysis of long-acting insulin analogues (detemir, glargine and degludec) for the treatment of adult type 1 diabetes in South Africa
    Verryn, Mark T.
    Cleary, Susan
    COST EFFECTIVENESS AND RESOURCE ALLOCATION, 2025, 23 (01):