Cost-utility analysis of 1-year treatment with adalimumab/standard care and standard care alone for ulcerative colitis in Poland

被引:4
|
作者
Stawowczyk, Ewa [1 ]
Kawalec, Pawel [2 ]
Pilc, Andrzej [3 ]
机构
[1] StatSoft Polska Sp Zoo, Krakow, Poland
[2] Jagiellonian Univ, Inst Publ Hlth, Dept Drug Management, Fac Hlth Sci,Med Coll, 20 Grzegorzecka St, PL-31531 Krakow, Poland
[3] Polish Acad Sci, Inst Pharmacol, Dept Neurobiol, Krakow, Poland
关键词
Ulcerative colitis; Cost-utility; Adalimumab; Economic analysis; Indirect costs; GASTROENTEROLOGY; COMPLICATIONS; THERAPY; DISEASE;
D O I
10.1007/s00228-016-2103-4
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Until recently, surgery was the only remaining choice for moderate to severe chronic ulcerative colitis patients who failed standard treatment or when it was not tolerated. Anti-TNF alpha treatment is a new, non-invasive option for the management of ulcerative colitis. The objective of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of induction and maintenance treatment up to 1 year of ulcerative colitis with adalimumab/standard care and standard care alone in Poland. A Markov model was used to estimate the expected costs and effects of adalimumab/standard care and a standard care alone. For each treatment option, the costs and quality adjusted life years were calculated to estimate the incremental cost-utility ratio. The analysis was performed from the perspective of the Polish public payer and society over a 30-year time horizon. Different direct and indirect costs and utility values were assigned to the various model health states. The treatment of ulcerative colitis patients with adalimumab/standard care up to 1 year instead of a standard care alone resulted in 0.14 additional years of life with full health (QALYs). The incremental cost-utility ratio of adalimumab/standard care compared to the standard care alone is estimated to be 76,120 a,not sign/QALY gained from NHF perspective and 71,457 a,not sign/QALY gained from social perspective. The biologic treatment of ulcerative colitis patients with adalimumab/standard care is more effective but also more costly compared with standard care alone.
引用
收藏
页码:1319 / 1325
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Clinical and economic benefits of lenzilumab plus standard of care compared with standard of care alone for the treatment of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 in the United States from the hospital perspective
    Kilcoyne, Adrian
    Jordan, Edward
    Zhou, Allen
    Thomas, Kimberly
    Pepper, Alicia N.
    Chappell, Dale
    Amarapala, Miyuru
    Hughes, Avery
    Thompson, Melissa
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ECONOMICS, 2022, 25 (01) : 160 - 171
  • [22] A multicenter clinical trial evaluating the durability of diabetic foot ulcer healing in ulcers treated with topical oxygen and standard of care versus standard of care alone 1 year post healing
    Al-Jalodi, Omar
    Kupcella, Megan
    Breisinger, Kristy
    Serena, Thomas E.
    INTERNATIONAL WOUND JOURNAL, 2022, 19 (07) : 1838 - 1842
  • [23] Cost-utility of a biofilm-disrupting gel versus standard of care in chronic wounds: a Markov microsimulation model based on a randomised controlled trial
    Carter, Marissa J.
    Myntti, Matthew F.
    JOURNAL OF WOUND CARE, 2019, 28 (07) : S24 - S38
  • [24] Randomised clinical trial: exclusive enteral nutrition versus standard of care for acute severe ulcerative colitis
    Sahu, Pabitra
    Kedia, Saurabh
    Vuyyuru, Sudheer K.
    Bajaj, Aditya
    Markandey, Manasvini
    Singh, Namrata
    Singh, Mukesh
    Kante, Bhaskar
    Kumar, Peeyush
    Ranjan, Mukesh
    Sahni, Peush
    Panwar, Rajesh
    Sharma, Raju
    Das, Prasenjit
    Makharia, Govind
    Travis, Simon P. L.
    Ahuja, Vineet
    ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2021, 53 (05) : 568 - 576
  • [25] Cost-utility analysis of a multispecialty interprofessional team dementia care model in Ontario, Canada
    Wong, William W. L.
    Lee, Linda
    Walker, Sasha
    Lee, Catherine
    Patel, Tejal
    Hillier, Loretta M.
    Costa, Andrew P.
    Sinha, Samir K.
    BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (04):
  • [26] Cost-utility analysis of tiotropium versus usual care in patients with COPD in the UK and Belgium
    Hettle, Robert
    Wouters, Hanne
    Ayres, Jon
    Gani, Ray
    Kelly, Steve
    Lion, Michaela
    Decramer, Marc
    RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2012, 106 (12) : 1722 - 1733
  • [27] Cost-Utility Analysis of Dapagliflozin as an Add-On to Standard Treatment for Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and High Risk of Cardiovascular Disease in Thailand
    Deerochanawong, Chaicharn
    Vareesangthip, Kriengsak
    Piyayotai, Dilok
    Thongsuk, Dittaya
    Pojchaijongdee, Nuch
    Permsuwan, Unchalee
    DIABETES THERAPY, 2021, 12 (07) : 1947 - 1963
  • [28] Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Versus Microendoscopic Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy for Unilateral Cervical Radiculopathy: A 1-Year Cost-Utility Analysis
    Monk, Steve H.
    Hani, Ummey
    Pfortmiller, Deborah
    Dyer, E. Hunter
    Smith, Mark D.
    Kim, Paul K.
    Bohl, Michael A.
    Coric, Domagoj
    Adamson, Tim E.
    Holland, Christopher M.
    McGirt, Matthew J.
    NEUROSURGERY, 2023, 93 (03) : 628 - 635
  • [29] Interspinous process devices versus standard conventional surgical decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: cost-utility analysis
    van den Akker-van Marle, M. Elske
    Moojen, Wouter A.
    Arts, Mark P.
    Vleggeert-Lankamp, Carmen L. A. M.
    Peul, Wilco C.
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2016, 16 (06) : 702 - 710
  • [30] A cost-utility analysis of the impact of electronic nicotine inhalers on health care costs and outcomes in Canada
    Pound, Catherine M.
    Coyle, Doug
    HEALTH PROMOTION AND CHRONIC DISEASE PREVENTION IN CANADA-RESEARCH POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2022, 42 (01): : 32 - 41