Patch Testing Results From the Massachusetts General Hospital Contact Dermatitis Clinic, 2007-2016

被引:19
作者
Tam, Idy [1 ,2 ]
Schalock, Peter C. [3 ]
Gonzalez, Ernesto [2 ,4 ]
Yu, JiaDe [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Tufts Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA 02111 USA
[2] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Dermatol, 50 Stanford St,Suite 200, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[3] Geisel Sch Med Dartmouth, Dept Surg Dermatol, Hanover, NH USA
[4] Harvard Med Sch, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
BASE-LINE SERIES; ALLERGY; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1097/DER.0000000000000593
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
Background Patch testing is the criterion standard for diagnosis of allergic contact dermatitis (ACD). Objective The aim of the study was to report the trends of patch testing results with the standard series at Massachusetts General Hospital from January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2016, compared with previous data from 1998 to 2006 and from 1990 to 2006 and those reported by the North American Contact Dermatitis Group. Methods Data were collected and analyzed from retrospective chart reviews, focusing on 50 allergens in our standard series. Results A total of 2373 patients were patch tested. One or more positive reactions were observed in 1428 patients (60.2%), and 1153 patients (48.6%) had a final primary diagnosis of ACD. Top 5 allergens were nickel (19.8%), fragrance mix I (14.6%), Myroxylon pereirae (balsam of Peru) (13.5%), neomycin (9.4%), and bacitracin (7.7%). Sensitization frequencies statistically increased over time for 3 allergens: nickel, neomycin, and propylene glycol, and decreased for 5 allergens: formaldehyde, paraben mix, thiuram mix, n-isopropyl-N-phenyl-4-phenylenediamine, and epoxy resin (P <= 0.001). Conclusions Surveillance of ACD trends is essential to detect emerging sensitizers. Patch testing is an important diagnostic tool for detection of ACD to commonly encountered and potential allergens.
引用
收藏
页码:202 / 208
页数:7
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
Albert M R, 1998, Am J Contact Dermat, V9, P207, DOI 10.1016/S1046-199X(98)90030-6
[2]  
Campaign for Safe Cosmetics, REVL EL TOX CHEM COS
[3]  
Cao LY, 2010, ARCH DERMATOL, V146, P1001, DOI 10.1001/archdermatol.2010.219
[4]   Management of Occupational Dermatitis [J].
Clark, Shane C. ;
Zirwas, Matthew J. .
DERMATOLOGIC CLINICS, 2009, 27 (03) :365-+
[5]   Nickel dermatitis from earrings 15 years after EU directive implementation: a clinical-epidemiological study and a market survey in Rome, Italy [J].
Cristaudo, A. ;
Petrucci, F. ;
Giannarelli, D. ;
Cercato, M. C. ;
Orsini, D. ;
Morrone, A. ;
Bocca, B. .
JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY AND VENEREOLOGY, 2019, 33 (10) :1928-1934
[6]   North American Contact Dermatitis Group Patch Test Results: 2015-2016 [J].
DeKoven, Joel G. ;
Warshaw, Erin M. ;
Zug, Kathryn A. ;
Maibach, Howard I. ;
Belsito, Donald V. ;
Sasseville, Denis ;
Taylor, James S. ;
Fowler, Joseph F. ;
Mathias, C. G. Toby ;
Marks, James G. ;
Pratt, Melanie D. ;
Zirwas, Matthew J. ;
DeLeo, Vincent A. .
DERMATITIS, 2018, 29 (06) :297-309
[7]   Parabens [J].
Fransway, Anthony F. ;
Fransway, Paulina J. ;
Belsito, Donald V. ;
Warshaw, Erin M. ;
Sasseville, Denis ;
Fowler, Joseph F., Jr. ;
DeKoven, Joel G. ;
Pratt, Melanie D. ;
Maibach, Howard I. ;
Taylor, James S. ;
Marks, James G. ;
Mathias, C. G. Toby ;
DeLeo, Vincent A. ;
Zirwas, J. Matthew ;
Zug, Kathryn A. ;
Atwater, Amber R. ;
Silverberg, Jonathan ;
Reeder, Margo J. .
DERMATITIS, 2019, 30 (01) :3-31
[8]   Allergic Contact Dermatitis due to Nickel: Descriptive Study in a Tertiary Hospital, 2000-2010 [J].
Garcia-Rabasco, A. E. ;
Zaragoza-Ninet, V. ;
Garcia-Ruiz, R. ;
de la Cuadra-Oyanguren, J. .
ACTAS DERMO-SIFILIOGRAFICAS, 2014, 105 (06) :590-596
[9]   Sensitization to reactive diluents and hardeners in epoxy resin systems. IVDK data 2002-2011. Part I: reaction frequencies [J].
Geier, Johannes ;
Lessmann, Holger ;
Hillen, Uwe ;
Skudlik, Christoph ;
Jappe, Uta .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 2016, 74 (02) :83-93
[10]   Changing frequency of thiuram allergy in healthcare workers with hand dermatitis [J].
Gibbon, KL ;
McFadden, JP ;
Rycroft, RJG ;
Ross, JS ;
Chinn, S ;
White, IR .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2001, 144 (02) :347-350