Bayesian regression methodology for estimating a receiver operating characteristic curve with two radiologic applications: Prostate biopsy and spiral CT of ureteral stones

被引:27
作者
O'Malley, AJ [1 ]
Zou, KH
Fielding, JF
Tempany, CMC
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Dept Hlth Care Policy, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve; Bayesian regression analysis;
D O I
10.1016/S1076-6332(03)80578-0
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Rationale and Objectives. The authors evaluated two Bayesian regression models for receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis of continuous diagnostic outcome data with covariates. Materials and Methods. Full and partial Bayesian regression models were applied to data from two studies (n = 180 and 100, respectively): (a) The diagnostic value of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels (outcome variable) for predicting disease after radical prostatectomy (gold standard) was evaluated for three risk groups (covariates) based on Gleason scores. (b) Spiral computed tomography was performed on patients with proved obstructing ureteral stones. The predictive value of stone size (outcome) was evaluated along with two treatment options (gold standard), as well as stone location (in or not in the ureterovesical junction [UVJ]) and patient age (covariates). Summary ROC measures were reported, and various prior distributions of the regression coefficients were investigated. Results. (a) In the PSA example, the ROC areas under the full model were 0.667, 0.769, and 0.703, respectively, for the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups. Under the partial model, the area beneath the ROC curve was 0.706. (b) The ROC areas for patients with ureteral stones in the UVJ decreased dramatically with age but otherwise were close to that under the partial model (ie, 0.774). The prior distribution had greater influence in the second example. Conclusion. The diagnostic tests were accurate in both examples. PSA levels were most accurate for staging prostate cancer among intermediate-risk patients. Stone size was predictive of treatment option for all patients other than those 40 years or older and with a stone in the UVJ.
引用
收藏
页码:713 / 725
页数:13
相关论文
共 30 条
[11]   A Bayesian approach to a general regression model for ROC curves [J].
Hellmich, M ;
Abrams, KR ;
Jones, DR ;
Lambert, PC .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1998, 18 (04) :436-443
[12]   A general class of hierarchical ordinal regression models with applications to correlated ROC analysis [J].
Ishwaran, H ;
Gatsonis, CA .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF STATISTICS-REVUE CANADIENNE DE STATISTIQUE, 2000, 28 (04) :731-750
[13]   The selection of prior distributions by formal rules [J].
Kass, RE ;
Wasserman, L .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1996, 91 (435) :1343-1370
[14]  
LINDLEY DV, 1982, INT ENCY STAT, V1, P197
[15]   ANALYZING A PORTION OF THE ROC CURVE [J].
MCCLISH, DK .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1989, 9 (03) :190-195
[16]  
Metz CE, 1998, STAT MED, V17, P1033, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19980515)17:9<1033::AID-SIM784>3.0.CO
[17]  
2-Z
[18]  
Peng FC, 1996, MED DECIS MAKING, V16, P404
[19]   An interpretation for the ROC curve and inference using GLM procedures [J].
Pepe, MS .
BIOMETRICS, 2000, 56 (02) :352-359
[20]   A regression modelling framework for receiver operating characteristic curves in medical diagnostic testing [J].
Pepe, MS .
BIOMETRIKA, 1997, 84 (03) :595-608