Monte Carlo simulation of large electron fields

被引:28
|
作者
Faddegon, Bruce A. [1 ]
Perl, Joseph [2 ]
Asai, Makoto [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Ctr Comprehens Canc, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[2] Stanford Linear Accelerator Ctr, Menlo Pk, CA 94025 USA
来源
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY | 2008年 / 53卷 / 05期
关键词
D O I
10.1088/0031-9155/53/5/021
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Two Monte Carlo systems, EGSnrc and Geant4, the latter with two different `physicslists,' were used to calculate dose distributions in large electron fields used in radiotherapy. Source and geometry parameters were adjusted to match calculated results to measurement. Both codes were capable of accurately reproducing the measured dose distributions of the six electron beams available on the accelerator. Depth penetration matched the average measured with a diode and parallel-plate chamber to 0.04 cm or better. Calculated depth dose curves agreed to 2% with diode measurements in the build-up region, although for the lower beam energies there was a discrepancy of up to 5% in this region when calculated results are compared to parallel-plate measurements. Dose profiles at the depth of maximum dose matched to 2-3% in the central 25 cm of the field, corresponding to the field size of the largest applicator. A 4% match was obtained outside the central region. The discrepancy observed in the bremsstrahlung tail in published results that used EGS4 is no longer evident. Simulations with the different codes and physics lists used different source energies, incident beam angles, thicknesses of the primary foils, and distance between the primary and secondary foil. The true source and geometry parameters were not known with sufficient accuracy to determine which parameter set, including the energy of the source, was closest to the truth. These results underscore the requirement for experimental benchmarks of depth penetration and electron scatter for beam energies and foils relevant to radiotherapy.
引用
收藏
页码:1497 / 1510
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Total skin electron therapy treatment optimization: Selection of an optimal scatterer using Monte Carlo simulation of single large scattered electron fields at extended distances
    Shokrani, P
    Elson, H
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2004, 31 (06) : 1924 - 1924
  • [32] A Monte Carlo simulation of secondary electron transport in diamond
    Li Peng
    Xu Zhou
    Li Ming
    Yang Xing-Fan
    ACTA PHYSICA SINICA, 2012, 61 (07)
  • [33] Monte Carlo simulation of projection electron beam lithography
    Sun, X.
    Xiao, P.
    Ding, Z. J.
    NANOSCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, PTS 1 AND 2, 2007, 121-123 : 1097 - 1101
  • [34] Monte Carlo simulation of electrochemical electron transfer processes
    Kuznetsov, AM
    Nazmutdinov, RR
    Schmickler, W
    JOURNAL OF ELECTROANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2002, 532 (1-2): : 171 - 180
  • [35] Monte Carlo simulation of electron transport in doped silicon
    KaiblingerGrujin, G
    Kosina, H
    Selberherr, S
    HIGH PERFORMANCE COMPUTING ON THE INFORMATION SUPERHIGHWAY - HPC ASIA '97, PROCEEDINGS, 1997, : 444 - 449
  • [36] MONTE-CARLO SIMULATION OF A GAAS ELECTRON SOURCE
    YANG, B
    CIULLO, G
    GUIDI, V
    TECCHIO, L
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICS D-APPLIED PHYSICS, 1992, 25 (12) : 1834 - 1837
  • [37] Monte Carlo simulation of electron transport in a carbon nanotube
    Pennington, G
    Goldsman, N
    SISPAD 2002: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SIMULATION OF SEMICONDUCTOR PROCESSES AND DEVICES, 2002, : 279 - 282
  • [38] Monte Carlo simulation for low energy electron transport
    Dubus, A
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE WORKSHOP "MONTE CARLO METHODS AND MODELS FOR APPLICATIONS IN ENERGY AND TECHNOLOGY", 1999, 6266 : 311 - +
  • [39] Electron mobility and Monte Carlo device simulation of MOSFETs
    Yamakawa, S
    Ueno, H
    Taniguchi, K
    Hamaguchi, C
    Miyatsuji, K
    Masaki, K
    Ravaioli, U
    VLSI DESIGN, 1998, 6 (1-4) : 27 - 30
  • [40] MONTE-CARLO SIMULATION OF ELECTRON AVALANCHE IN HYDROGEN
    HAYASHI, M
    JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE, 1979, 40 : 45 - 46