Capacity Building in Peer-review: A Student-Led Journal Report

被引：0

作者：

Campos, Leticia Nunes ^{[1
]}

Zuffo Yabrude, Angela Theresa ^{[2
]}

Duque Estrada Medeiros, Samantha Sartore ^{[3
]}

Silva Natividade, Taiane do Socorro ^{[4
]}

Luizeti, Barbara Okabaiasse ^{[5
]}

Cunha, Moises da Costa ^{[6
]}

Gomes Guimaraes Alves, Rebeca Maria ^{[7
]}

Bezerra, Aristocles Hitallo ^{[8
]}

Ponte Albuquerque Ribeiro, Lucas Loiola ^{[9
]}

Helal, Lucas ^{[10
,11
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Pernambuco, Rua Arnobio Marques, BR-310 Recife, PE, Brazil

[2] Univ Reg Blumenau, Blumenau, SC, Brazil

[3] Pontificia Univ Catolica Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil

[4] Univ Estado Para, Belem, Para, Brazil

[5] Univ Cesumar, Maringa, Parana, Brazil

[6] Univ Anhanguera, Campo Grande, MS, Brazil

[7] Univ Fed Rio de Janeiro, Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil

[8] Ctr Univ Unifacisa, Campina Grande, Paraiba, Brazil

[9] Univ Fortaleza, Fortaleza, Ceara, Brazil

[10] Hosp Clin Porto Alegre, Diretoria Pesquisa, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil

[11] Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Sch Med, Grad Program Cardiol & Cardiovasc Sci, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil

来源：

MEDICAL SCIENCE EDUCATOR | 2022年 / 32卷 / 05期

关键词：

Education; Medical; Peer review; Research; Self-directed learning; Teaching;

D O I：

10.1007/s40670-022-01601-1

中图分类号：

G40 [教育学];

学科分类号：

040101 ; 120403 ;

摘要：

Peer-review optimizes the quality of research articles; however, new strategies need to be implemented to enhance peer-review capacity. This report comprises the peer-review process of a medical student-led journal editorial board, detailing its challenges and the students' role. The peer education approach conducted a capacity-building activity, developing guidelines, and practicing critical appraisal and constructive feedback in manners that classroom research training cannot. Understandings of an effective peer-review brought to discussion from standardization and blinding to ethical and scientific competencies essential in researchers. All parties, including students, should be allowed to extend their capabilities to enhance scholarly publishing.

引用

页码：959 / 964

页数：6

共 31 条

[1] How can we ensure visibility and diversity in research contributions? How the Contributor Role Taxonomy (CRediT) is helping the shift from authorship to contributorship
Allen, Liz
O'Connell, Alison
Kiermer, Veronique
[J]. LEARNED PUBLISHING, 2019, 32 (01) : 71 - 74
[2] [Anonymous], LEARN PEER REV CONF
[3] [Anonymous], US EQUATOR NETWORK
[4] [Anonymous], 2013, ETH GUID PEER REV EN
[5] [Anonymous], J BRAZILIAN MEDICAL
[6] [Anonymous], REVIEWER ROLES RESPO
[7] Azizi M, 2017, J PEDIAT REV, V5, DOI 10.17795/jpr-7692
[8] Student-led peer review of an online teaching file: perspectives after 2 years
Bozung, Bryan R.
Houston, Kaiulani
Lilly, John F., III
Jordan, Sheryl G.
Fordham, Lynn A.
Beck Dallaghan, Gary
[J]. MEDICAL EDUCATION ONLINE, 2021, 26 (01):
[9] The effect of publishing peer review reports on referee behavior in five scholarly journals
Bravo, Giangiacomo
Grimaldo, Francisco
Lopez-Inesta, Emilia
Mehmani, Bahar
Squazzoni, Flaminio
[J]. NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2019, 10 (1)
[10] Impact of interventions to improve the quality of peer review of biomedical journals: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Bruce, Rachel
Chauvin, Anthony
Trinquart, Ludovic
Ravaud, Philippe
Boutron, Isabelle
[J]. BMC MEDICINE, 2016, 14

← 1 2 3 4 →