Underestimating the severity of bipolar depression: a comparison of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale items

被引:12
作者
Sung, Gyhye [1 ]
Kim, Bin-Na [1 ]
Lee, Eun-Ho [1 ]
Yu, Bum-Hee [1 ]
Hong, Kyung Sue [1 ]
Kim, Ji-Hae [1 ]
机构
[1] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Sch Med, Samsung Med Ctr, Dept Psychiat, Seoul 135710, South Korea
关键词
Bipolar depression; Unipolar depression; Hamilton Depression Rating Scale; Severity of depression; CLINICAL-FEATURES; UNIPOLAR; DISORDER; DISTINCTIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jad.2011.11.007
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) is a clinician-rated instrument to assess the severity of depressive symptoms that does not account for the differences between bipolar (BP) and unipolar (UP) disorders. This study attempts to evaluate differences in the total scores of the HDRS, Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) ratings of patients with bipolar II (BP-II) and UP depression. Each factor and item of the HDRS was compared between the two groups in order to identify specific symptoms. Methods: 588 patients with bipolar II disorder (n=101) and major depressive disorder (n=487) were enrolled in this study. All participants completed the BDI and individually interviewed using HDRS. Each participant was also evaluated with regard to global functioning. Results: The BP group scored lower on the total HDRS and all of the factors. The BP and UP groups did not differ in terms of BDI and GAF. With regard to the individual items of HORS, the BP group scored lower on items associated with 'Depressed mood', 'Work and interest', 'Somatic, gastro', and 'Hypochondriasis'. Limitations: There was a significant age differences between the two groups. Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that the severity of bipolar depression may be less well-recognized by the HDRS due to the different presentations of depressive symptoms. Thus, the clinician should be careful not to underestimate the sincerity of patients' reports when evaluating depression. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:425 / 429
页数:5
相关论文
共 34 条
[21]   Bipolar II vs. unipolar depression: psychopathologic differentiation by dimensional measures [J].
Hantouche, EG ;
Akiskal, HS .
JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2005, 84 (2-3) :127-132
[22]   Systematic clinical methodology for validating bipolar-II disorder:: data in mid-stream from a French national multi-site study (EPIDEP) [J].
Hantouche, EG ;
Akiskal, HS ;
Lancrenon, S ;
Allilaire, JF ;
Sechter, D ;
Azorin, JM ;
Bourgeois, M ;
Fraud, JP ;
Châtenet-Duchêne, L .
JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 1998, 50 (2-3) :163-173
[23]   The long-term natural history of the weekly symptomatic status of bipolar I disorder [J].
Judd, LL ;
Akiskal, HS ;
Schettler, PJ ;
Endicott, J ;
Maser, J ;
Solomon, DA ;
Leon, AC ;
Rice, JA ;
Keller, MB .
ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY, 2002, 59 (06) :530-537
[24]   BEHAVIORAL MEASUREMENT AND DRUG RESPONSE CHARACTERISTICS OF UNIPOLAR AND BIPOLAR DEPRESSION [J].
KATZ, MM ;
ROBINS, E ;
CROUGHAN, J ;
SECUNDA, S ;
SWANN, A .
PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 1982, 12 (01) :25-36
[25]  
박혜원, 2009, [JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN NEUROPSYCHIATRIC ASSOCIATION, 신경정신의학], V48, P21
[26]  
Lee YH., 1991, KOR J CLIN PSYCHOL, V10, P98
[27]   The clinical features of bipolar depression: A comparison with matched major depressive disorder patients [J].
Mitchell, PB ;
Wilhelm, K ;
Parker, G ;
Austin, MP ;
Rutgers, P ;
Malhi, GS .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2001, 62 (03) :212-216
[28]   Bipolar depression: phenomenological overview and clinical characteristics [J].
Mitchell, PB ;
Malhi, GS .
BIPOLAR DISORDERS, 2004, 6 (06) :530-539
[29]   Rating depressed patients:: observer- vs self-assessment [J].
Möller, HJ .
EUROPEAN PSYCHIATRY, 2000, 15 (03) :160-172
[30]  
이중서, 2005, [JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN NEUROPSYCHIATRIC ASSOCIATION, 신경정신의학], V44, P456