Multiple Sensor Data Fusion for Degradation Modeling and Prognostics Under Multiple Operational Conditions

被引:84
作者
Yan, Hao [1 ]
Liu, Kaibo [2 ]
Zhang, Xi [3 ]
Shi, Jianjun [1 ]
机构
[1] Georgia Inst Technol, H Milton Stewart Sch Ind & Syst Engn, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Ind & Syst Engn, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[3] Peking Univ, Dept Ind Engn & Management, Coll Engn, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Data fusion; multiple operational conditions; multiple sensors; prognostics; remaining life prediction; RESIDUAL-LIFE DISTRIBUTIONS; PREDICTION; TIME; ENVIRONMENTS;
D O I
10.1109/TR.2016.2575449
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Due to the rapid advances in sensing and computing technology, multiple sensors have been widely used to simultaneously monitor the health status of an operation unit. This creates a data-rich environment, enabling an unprecedented opportunity to make better understanding and inference about the current and future behavior of the unit in real time. Depending on specific task requirements, a unit is often required to run under multiple operational conditions, each of which may affect the degradation path of the unit differently. Thus, two fundamental challenges remain to be solved for effective degradation modeling and prognostic analysis: 1) how to leverage the dependent information among multiple sensor signals to better understand the health condition of the unit; and 2) how to model the effects of multiple conditions on the degradation characteristics of the unit. To address these two issues, this paper develops a data fusion methodology that integrates the information from multiple sensors to construct a health index when the monitored unit runs under multiple operational conditions. Our goal is that the developed health index provides a much better characterization of the health condition of the degraded unit, and, thus, leads to a better prediction of the remaining lifetime. Unlike other existing approaches, the developed data fusion model combines the fusion procedure and the degradation modeling under different operational conditions in a unified manner. The effectiveness of the proposed method is demonstrated in a case study, which involves a degradation dataset of aircraft gas turbine engines collected from 21 sensors under six different operational conditions.
引用
收藏
页码:1416 / 1426
页数:11
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [21] USING DEGRADATION MEASURES TO ESTIMATE A TIME-TO-FAILURE DISTRIBUTION
    LU, CJ
    MEEKER, WQ
    [J]. TECHNOMETRICS, 1993, 35 (02) : 161 - 174
  • [22] Multivariate performance reliability prediction in real-time
    Lu, S
    Lu, H
    Kolarik, WJ
    [J]. RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2001, 72 (01) : 39 - 45
  • [23] Nelson W. B., 2009, ACCELERATED TESTING
  • [24] A particle-filtering approach for on-line fault diagnosis and failure prognosis
    Orchard, Marcos E.
    Vachtsevanos, George J.
    [J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE INSTITUTE OF MEASUREMENT AND CONTROL, 2009, 31 (3-4) : 221 - 246
  • [25] Stochastic degradation models with several accelerating variables
    Park, Chanseok
    Padgett, William J.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON RELIABILITY, 2006, 55 (02) : 379 - 390
  • [26] Centralized and decentralized process and sensor fault monitoring using data fusion based on adaptive extended Kalman filter algorithm
    Salahshoor, Karim
    Mosallaei, Mohsen
    Bayat, Mohammadreza
    [J]. MEASUREMENT, 2008, 41 (10) : 1059 - 1076
  • [27] Saxena A, 2008, 2008 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PROGNOSTICS AND HEALTH MANAGEMENT (PHM), P1
  • [28] Shiau JJH, 1999, IEEE T RELIAB, V48, P149, DOI 10.1109/24.784273
  • [29] Aircraft turbofan engine health estimation using constrained Kalman filtering
    Simon, D
    Simon, DL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2005, 127 (02): : 323 - 328
  • [30] A Data-Driven Failure Prognostics Method Based on Mixture of Gaussians Hidden Markov Models
    Tobon-Mejia, Diego Alejandro
    Medjaher, Kamal
    Zerhouni, Noureddine
    Tripot, Gerard
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON RELIABILITY, 2012, 61 (02) : 491 - 503