Clutter suppression algorithm based on fast converging sparse Bayesian learning for airborne radar

被引:66
作者
Wang, Zetao [1 ]
Xie, Wenchong [2 ]
Duan, Keqing [2 ]
Wang, Yongliang [2 ]
机构
[1] NUDT, Coll Elect Sci & Engn, Changsha 410073, Hunan, Peoples R China
[2] Wuhan Radar Acad, Wuhan 430019, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Space-time adaptive processing; Clutter suppression; Sparse representation; Bayesian inference; REPRESENTATION; RECOVERY; SBL;
D O I
10.1016/j.sigpro.2016.06.023
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Adapting the space-time adaptive processing (STAP) filter with finite number of secondary data is of particular interest for airborne phased-array radar clutter suppression. Sparse representation (SR) technique has been introduced into the STAP framework for the benefit of drastically reduced training requirement. However, most SR algorithms need the fine tuning of one or more user parameters, which affect the final results significantly. Sparse Bayesian learning (SBL) and multiple sparse Bayesian learning (M-SBL) are robust and user parameter free approaches, but they converge quite slowly. To remedy this limitation, a fast converging SBL (FCSBL) approach is proposed based on Bayesian inference along with a simple approximation term, then, it is extended to the multiple measurement vector case, and the resulting approach is termed as M-FCSBL. To improve the performance of STAP in finite secondary data situation, the M-FCSBL is utilized to estimate the clutter plus noise covariance matrix (CCM) from a limited number of secondary data, and then the resulting CCM is adopted to devise the STAP filter and suppress the clutter. Numerical experiments with both simulated and Mountain-Top data are carried out. It is shown that the proposed algorithm has superior clutter suppression performance in finite secondary data situation. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:159 / 168
页数:10
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1992, Tech. Rep. RL-TR-92-21
[2]   Bayesian Group-Sparse Modeling and Variational Inference [J].
Babacan, S. Derin ;
Nakajima, Shinichi ;
Do, Minh N. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2014, 62 (11) :2906-2921
[3]   Performance comparison between statistical-based and direct data domain STAPs [J].
Burintramart, Santana ;
Sarkar, Tapan K. ;
Zhang, Yu ;
Wicks, Michael C. .
DIGITAL SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2007, 17 (04) :737-755
[4]  
Foucart S., 2013, A Mathematical Introduction to CompressiveSensing
[5]   Knowledge-aided adaptive radar at DARPA - An overview [J].
Guerci, JR ;
Baranoski, EJ .
IEEE SIGNAL PROCESSING MAGAZINE, 2006, 23 (01) :41-50
[6]   Enhanced Sparse Bayesian Learning via Statistical Thresholding for Signals in Structured Noise [J].
Hurtado, Martin ;
Muravchik, Carlos H. ;
Nehorai, Arye .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2013, 61 (21) :5430-5443
[7]   Bayesian compressive sensing [J].
Ji, Shihao ;
Xue, Ya ;
Carin, Lawrence .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2008, 56 (06) :2346-2356
[8]   Multitask Compressive Sensing [J].
Ji, Shihao ;
Dunson, David ;
Carin, Lawrence .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2009, 57 (01) :92-106
[9]   Analysis of space-time adaptive processing performance using K-means clustering algorithm for normalisation method in non-homogeneity detector process [J].
Kang, S. ;
Ryu, J. ;
Lee, J. ;
Jeong, J. .
IET SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2011, 5 (02) :113-120
[10]  
Klemm R., 2006, PRINCIPLES SPACE TIM, V3